X-Shooting ULLYSES: Massive Stars at low metallicity -- IV. Spectral analysis methods and exemplary results for O stars
Authors:
A. A. C. Sander,
J. -C. Bouret,
M. Bernini-Peron,
J. Puls,
F. Backs,
S. R. Berlanas,
J. M. Bestenlehner,
S. A. Brands,
A. Herrero,
F. Martins,
O. Maryeva,
D. Pauli,
V. Ramachandran,
P. A. Crowther,
V. M. A. Gómez-González,
A. C. Gormaz-Matamala,
W. -R. Hamann,
D. J. Hillier,
R. Kuiper,
C. J. K. Larkin,
R. R. Lefever,
A. Mehner,
F. Najarro,
L. M. Oskinova,
E. C. Schösser
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
CONTEXT: The spectral analysis of hot, massive stars is a fundamental astrophysical method to obtain their intrinsic properties and their feedback. Quantitative spectroscopy for hot, massive stars requires detailed numerical modeling of the atmosphere and an iterative treatment to obtain the best solution within a given framework. AIMS: We present an overview of different techniques for the quanti…
▽ More
CONTEXT: The spectral analysis of hot, massive stars is a fundamental astrophysical method to obtain their intrinsic properties and their feedback. Quantitative spectroscopy for hot, massive stars requires detailed numerical modeling of the atmosphere and an iterative treatment to obtain the best solution within a given framework. AIMS: We present an overview of different techniques for the quantitative spectroscopy of hot stars employed within the X-Shooting ULLYSES collaboration, from grid-based approaches to tailored fits. By performing a blind test, we gain an overview about the similarities and differences of the resulting parameters. Our study aims to provide an overview of the parameter spread caused by different approaches. METHODS: For three different stars from the sample (SMC O5 star AzV 377, LMC O7 star Sk -69 50, and LMC O9 star Sk -66 171), we employ different atmosphere codes (CMFGEN, Fastwind, PoWR) and strategies to determine their best-fitting model. For our analyses, UV and optical spectra are used to derive the properties with some methods relying purely on optical data for comparison. To determine the overall spectral energy distribution, we further employ additional photometry from the literature. RESULTS: Effective temperatures for each of three sample stars agree within 3 kK while the differences in log g can be up to 0.2 dex. Luminosity differences of up to 0.1 dex result from different reddening assumptions, which seem to be larger for the methods employing a genetic algorithm. All sample stars are nitrogen-enriched. CONCLUSIONS: We find a reasonable agreement between the different methods. Tailored fitting tends to be able to minimize discrepancies obtained with more course or automatized treatments. UV spectral data is essential for the determination of realistic wind parameters. For one target (Sk -69 50), we find clear indications of an evolved status.
△ Less
Submitted 3 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Misidentification of Short GRBs as Magnetars in Nearby Galaxies
Authors:
E. C. Schösser,
J. M. Burgess,
J. Greiner
Abstract:
Context. Recent observations of GRB 200415A, a short and very bright pulse of $γ$-rays, have been claimed to be an extragalactic magnetar giant flare (MGF) whose proposed host galaxy is the nearby ${\mathrm{NGC} \, 253}$. However, as the redshift of the transient object was not measured, it is possible that the measured location of the transient on the celestial sphere and the location of the loca…
▽ More
Context. Recent observations of GRB 200415A, a short and very bright pulse of $γ$-rays, have been claimed to be an extragalactic magnetar giant flare (MGF) whose proposed host galaxy is the nearby ${\mathrm{NGC} \, 253}$. However, as the redshift of the transient object was not measured, it is possible that the measured location of the transient on the celestial sphere and the location of the local galaxy merely coincided. Thus, its real progenitor could have been arbitrarily far away, leading possibly to a much larger luminosity of the transient, and leaving the standard model of short gamma-ray bursts (sGRBs), the merger of two compact objects, as an explanation for the observations.
Aims. In this study, our aim is to compute the false-alarm rate for the misinterpretation of sGRBs as magnetars in a given observation period.
Methods. We simulate synthetic surveys of sGRB observations in a time period of 14 years corresponding to the operation period of the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detector. For all sGRBs that align on the sky with a nearby Local Volume galaxy, we generate realistic data which is folded through the response of the GBM. To identify candidates of sGRBs that may be misinterpreted as magnetars, six selections (spatial, star formation rate, GBM trigger, duration, isotropic energy release, and fluence) are applied to the simulated surveys.
Results. In a non-negligible fraction, 15.7 %, of the simulated surveys, we identify at least one sGRB that has the same characteristics as a magnetar giant flare and could be thus misinterpreted as magnetar. Thus, we conclude that the selections that were proposed in previous work to unambiguously identify an extragalactic magnetar giant flare are not sufficient.
△ Less
Submitted 10 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
