Benchmarking the IRDC G351.77-0.53: Gaia DR3 distance, mass distribution, and star formation content
Authors:
S. D. Reyes-Reyes,
A. M. Stutz,
S. T. Megeath,
Fengwei Xu,
R. H. Álvarez-Gutiérrez,
N. Sandoval-Garrido,
H. -L. Liu
Abstract:
While intensively studied, it remains unclear how the star formation (SF) in Infrared Dark Clouds (IRDCs) compares to that of nearby clouds. We study G351.77-0.53 (henceforth G351), a cluster-forming filamentary IRDC. We begin by characterizing its young stellar object (YSO) content. Based on the average parallax of likely members, we obtain a Gaia distance of $\sim\,2.0\pm0.14$ kpc, resolving the…
▽ More
While intensively studied, it remains unclear how the star formation (SF) in Infrared Dark Clouds (IRDCs) compares to that of nearby clouds. We study G351.77-0.53 (henceforth G351), a cluster-forming filamentary IRDC. We begin by characterizing its young stellar object (YSO) content. Based on the average parallax of likely members, we obtain a Gaia distance of $\sim\,2.0\pm0.14$ kpc, resolving the literature distance ambiguity. Using our Herschel-derived N(H$_2$) map, we measure a total gas mass of 10200 M$_{\odot}$ (within 11 pc$^2$) and the average line-mass profile of the entire filament, which we model as $λ=~1660 (w/\rm pc )^{0.62}\,\,M_{\odot}\,\rm{pc}^{-1}$. At $w < 0.63$ pc, our $λ$ profile is higher and has a steeper power-law index than $λ$ profiles extracted in Orion A and most of its substructures. Based on the YSOs inside the filament area, we estimate the SF efficiency (SFE) and SF rate (SFR). We calculate a factor of 5 incompleteness correction for our YSO catalog relative to Spitzer surveys of Orion A. The G351 SFE is $\sim 1.8$ times lower than that of Orion A and lower than the median value for local clouds. We measure SFR and gas masses to estimate the efficiency per free-fall time, $ε_{\rm ff}$. We find that $ε_{\rm ff}$ is $\sim$ 1.1 dex below the previously proposed mean local relation, and $\sim\,4.7\times$ below Orion A. These observations indicate that local SF-relations do not capture variations present in the Galaxy. We speculate that cloud youth and/or magnetic fields might account for the G351 inefficiency.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
ALMA-IMF II -- investigating the origin of stellar masses: Continuum Images and Data Processing
Authors:
A. Ginsburg,
T. Csengeri,
R. Galván-Madrid,
N. Cunningham,
R. H. Álvarez-Gutiérrez,
T. Baug,
M. Bonfand,
S. Bontemps,
G. Busquet,
D. J. Díaz-González,
M. Fernández-López,
A. Guzmán,
F. Herpin,
H. Liu,
A. López-Sepulcre,
F. Louvet,
L. Maud,
F. Motte,
F. Nakamura,
T. Nony,
F. A. Olguin,
Y. Pouteau,
P. Sanhueza,
A. M. Stutz,
A. P. M. Towner
, et al. (27 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the first data release of the ALMA-IMF Large Program, which covers the 12m-array continuum calibration and imaging. The ALMA-IMF Large Program is a survey of fifteen dense molecular cloud regions spanning a range of evolutionary stages that aims to measure the core mass function (CMF). We describe the data acquisition and calibration done by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Ar…
▽ More
We present the first data release of the ALMA-IMF Large Program, which covers the 12m-array continuum calibration and imaging. The ALMA-IMF Large Program is a survey of fifteen dense molecular cloud regions spanning a range of evolutionary stages that aims to measure the core mass function (CMF). We describe the data acquisition and calibration done by the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) observatory and the subsequent calibration and imaging we performed. The image products are combinations of multiple 12m array configurations created from a selection of the observed bandwidth using multi-term, multi-frequency synthesis imaging and deconvolution. The data products are self-calibrated and exhibit substantial noise improvements over the images produced from the delivered data. We compare different choices of continuum selection, calibration parameters, and image weighting parameters, demonstrating the utility and necessity of our additional processing work. Two variants of continuum selection are used and will be distributed: the "best-sensitivity" data, which include the full bandwidth, including bright emission lines that contaminate the continuum, and "cleanest", which select portions of the spectrum that are unaffected by line emission. We present a preliminary analysis of the spectral indices of the continuum data, showing that the ALMA products are able to clearly distinguish free-free emission from dust emission, and that in some cases we are able to identify optically thick emission sources. The data products are made public with this release.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2023; v1 submitted 15 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
