-
ULF wave transmission across collisionless shocks: 2.5D local hybrid simulations
Authors:
Primoz Kajdic,
Yann Pfau-Kempf,
Lucile Turc,
Andrew P Dimmock,
Minna Palmroth,
Kazue Takahashi,
Eemilia Kilpua,
Jan Soucek,
Naoko Takahashi,
Luis Preisser,
Xochitl Blanco-Cano,
Domenico Trotta,
David Burgess
Abstract:
We study the interaction of upstream ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves with collisionless shocks by analyzing the outputs of eleven 2D local hybrid simulation runs. Our simulated shocks have Alfvénic Mach numbers between 4.29-7.42 and their $θ_{BN}$ angles are 15$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$, 45$^\circ$ and 50$^\circ$. The ULF wave foreshocks develop upstream of all of them. The wavelength and the amplitude…
▽ More
We study the interaction of upstream ultra-low frequency (ULF) waves with collisionless shocks by analyzing the outputs of eleven 2D local hybrid simulation runs. Our simulated shocks have Alfvénic Mach numbers between 4.29-7.42 and their $θ_{BN}$ angles are 15$^\circ$, 30$^\circ$, 45$^\circ$ and 50$^\circ$. The ULF wave foreshocks develop upstream of all of them. The wavelength and the amplitude of the upstream waves exhibit a complex dependence on the shock's M$_A$ and $θ_{BN}$. The wavelength positively correlates with both parameters, with the dependence on $θ_{BN}$ being much stronger. The amplitude of the ULF waves is proportional to the product of the reflected beam velocity and density, which also depend on M$_A$ and $θ_{BN}$. The interaction of the ULF waves with the shock causes large-scale (several tens of upstream ion inertial lengths) shock rippling. The properties of the shock ripples are related to the ULF wave properties, namely thier wavelength and amplitude. In turn, the ripples have a large impact on the ULF wave transmission across the shock because they change local shock properties ($θ_{BN}$, strength), so that different sections of the same ULF wave front encounter shock with different characteristics. Downstream fluctuations do not resemble the upstream waves in terms the wavefront extension, orientation or their wavelength. However some features are conserved in the Fourier spectra of downstream compressive waves that present a bump or flattening at wavelengths approximately corresponding to those of the upstream ULF waves. In the transverse downstream spectra these features are weaker.
△ Less
Submitted 25 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
-
Interplanetary magnetic flux rope observed at ground level by HAWC
Authors:
S. Akiyama,
R. Alfaro,
C. Alvarez,
J. R. Angeles Camacho,
J. C. Arteaga-Velázquez,
K. P. Arunbabu,
D. Avila Rojas,
H. A. Ayala Solares,
E. Belmont-Moreno,
K. S. Caballero-Mora,
T. Capistrán,
A. Carramiñana,
S. Casanova,
P. Colin-Farias,
U. Cotti,
J. Cotzomi,
E. De la Fuente,
C. de León,
R. Diaz Hernandez,
C. Espinoza,
N. Fraija,
A. Galván-Gámez,
D. Garcia,
J. A. García-González,
F. Garfias
, et al. (37 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We report the ground-level detection of a Galactic Cosmic-Ray (GCR) flux enhancement lasting $\sim$ 17 hr and associated with the passage of a magnetic flux rope (MFR) over the Earth. The MFR was associated with a slow Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) caused by the eruption of a filament on 2016 October 9. Due to the quiet conditions during the eruption and the lack of interactions during the interplan…
▽ More
We report the ground-level detection of a Galactic Cosmic-Ray (GCR) flux enhancement lasting $\sim$ 17 hr and associated with the passage of a magnetic flux rope (MFR) over the Earth. The MFR was associated with a slow Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) caused by the eruption of a filament on 2016 October 9. Due to the quiet conditions during the eruption and the lack of interactions during the interplanetary CME transport to the Earth, the associated MFR preserved its configuration and reached the Earth with a strong magnetic field, low density, and a very low turbulence level compared to the local background, thus generating the ideal conditions to redirect and guide GCRs (in the $\sim$ 8 to 60 GV rigidity range) along the magnetic field of the MFR. An important negative $B_Z$ component inside the MFR caused large disturbances in the geomagnetic field and a relatively strong geomagnetic storm. However, these disturbances are not the main factors behind the GCR enhancement. Instead, we found that the major factor was the alignment between the MFR axis and the asymptotic direction of the observer.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
First observations of irregular surface of interplanetary shocks at ion scales by Cluster
Authors:
Primož Kajdič,
Luis Preisser,
Xóchitl Blanco-Cano,
David Burgess,
Domenico Trotta
Abstract:
We present the first observational evidence of the irregular surface of interplanetary (IP) shocks by using multi-spacecraft observations of the Cluster mission. In total we discuss observations of four IP shocks that exhibit moderate Alfvénic Mach numbers (M$_A\leq$6.5). Three of them are high-$β$ shocks with upstream $β$ = 2.2--3.7. During the times when these shocks were observed, the Cluster s…
▽ More
We present the first observational evidence of the irregular surface of interplanetary (IP) shocks by using multi-spacecraft observations of the Cluster mission. In total we discuss observations of four IP shocks that exhibit moderate Alfvénic Mach numbers (M$_A\leq$6.5). Three of them are high-$β$ shocks with upstream $β$ = 2.2--3.7. During the times when these shocks were observed, the Cluster spacecraft formed constellations with inter-spacecraft separations ranging from less than one upstream ion inertial length (d$_i$) up to 100~d$_i$. Expressed in kilometers, the distances ranged between 38~km and $\sim$10$^4$~km. We show that magnetic field profiles and the local shock normals of observed shocks are very similar when the spacecraft are of the order of one d$_i$ apart, but are strikingly different when the distances increase to ten or more d$_i$. We interpret these differences to be due to the irregular surface of IP shocks and discuss possible causes for such irregularity. We strengthen our interpretation by comparing observed shock profiles with profiles of simulated shocks. The latter had similar characteristics (M$_A$, $θ_{BN}$, upstream ion $β$) as observed shocks and the profiles were obtained at separations across the simulation domain equivalent to the Cluster inter-spacecraft distances.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
