-
Implications of DES 5YR SNe Dataset for $Λ$CDM
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Dark Energy Survey five-year supernovae data (DES 5YR SNe) in conjunction with Planck CMB and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) BAO data has detected a strong dynamical dark energy deviation from the $Λ$CDM model. Here, we shift the focus of DES data to the pressureless matter sector in the $Λ$CDM model by studying the matter density parameter $Ω_m$. Employing frequentist profile likelih…
▽ More
Dark Energy Survey five-year supernovae data (DES 5YR SNe) in conjunction with Planck CMB and Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI) BAO data has detected a strong dynamical dark energy deviation from the $Λ$CDM model. Here, we shift the focus of DES data to the pressureless matter sector in the $Λ$CDM model by studying the matter density parameter $Ω_m$. Employing frequentist profile likelihoods, we demonstrate that $Ω_m$ increases with effective redshift in the DES dataset at up to $2.5 σ$ level. At the highest redshifts, one encounters negative dark energy densities $Ω_m > 1$. Our findings corroborate earlier observations in Pantheon and Pantheon+ datasets with an independent SNe dataset with a higher effective redshift. In an appendix, we confirm that curvature $Ω_k$ decreases with effective redshift disfavouring a flat Universe in higher redshift DES SNe at $> 3 σ$. Our choice of $Ω_k$ prior leads to an underestimation of the tension with a flat Universe.
△ Less
Submitted 21 June, 2024; v1 submitted 10 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
Does DESI 2024 Confirm $Λ$CDM?
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Maria Giovanna Dainotti,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Dejan Stojkovic
Abstract:
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI cons…
▽ More
We demonstrate that a $\sim 2 σ$ discrepancy with the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology in DESI Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ translates into an unexpectedly large $Ω_m$ value, $Ω_m = 0.668^{+0.180}_{-0.169}$. We independently confirm that this anomaly drives the preference for $w_0 > -1$ in DESI data confronted to the $w_0 w_a$CDM model. We show that redshift bins of DESI constraints allow $Ω_m$ to wiggle at the $\sim 2 σ$ level with increasing effective redshift in the $Λ$CDM model. Given that LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ is at odds with Type Ia supernovae in overlapping redshifts, we expect that this anomaly will decrease in statistical significance with future DESI data releases leaving an increasing $Ω_m$ trend with effective redshift at higher redshifts. We estimate the significance of the latter in DESI data at $\sim 1.8 σ$ and comment on how it dovetails with independent observations. It is imperative to understand what makes DESI LRG data at $z_{\textrm{eff}} = 0.51$ an outlier when it comes to $Ω_m$ determinations.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 12 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
MCMC Marginalisation Bias and $Λ$CDM tensions
Authors:
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari,
Darragh Sherwin
Abstract:
Hubble tension is a problem in one-dimensional (1D) posteriors, since local $H_0$ determinations are only sensitive to a single parameter. Projected 1D posteriors for $Λ$CDM cosmological parameters become more non-Gaussian with increasing effective redshift when the model is fitted to redshift binned data in the late Universe. We explain mathematically why this non-Gaussianity arises and show usin…
▽ More
Hubble tension is a problem in one-dimensional (1D) posteriors, since local $H_0$ determinations are only sensitive to a single parameter. Projected 1D posteriors for $Λ$CDM cosmological parameters become more non-Gaussian with increasing effective redshift when the model is fitted to redshift binned data in the late Universe. We explain mathematically why this non-Gaussianity arises and show using observational Hubble data (OHD) that Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) marginalisation leads to 1D posteriors that fail to track the $χ^2$ minimum at $68\%$ confidence level in high redshift bins. To remedy this limitation of MCMC, we resort to profile distributions as a complementary technique. Doing so, we observe that $z \gtrsim 1$ cosmic chronometer (CC) data currently prefers a non-evolving (constant) Hubble parameter over a Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology at $\sim 2 σ$. Within the Hubble tension debate, it is imperative that subsamples of data sets with differing redshifts yield similar $H_0$ values. In addition, we confirm that MCMC degeneracies observed in 2D posteriors are not due to curves of constant $χ^2$. Finally, on the assumption that the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmological model is correct, using profile distributions we confirm a $>2 σ$ discrepancy with Planck-$Λ$CDM in a combination of CC and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data beyond $ z \sim 1.5$. This confirms a discrepancy reported earlier with fresh methodology.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2023; v1 submitted 30 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
$S_8$ increases with effective redshift in $Λ$CDM cosmology
Authors:
Shahnawaz A. Adil,
Özgür Akarsu,
Mohammad Malekjani,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
Anjan A. Sen,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Hubble constant $H_0$ and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations $S_8$ determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that $H_0$ decreases and $S_8$ increases with eff…
▽ More
Hubble constant $H_0$ and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations $S_8$ determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat $Λ$CDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that $H_0$ decreases and $S_8$ increases with effective redshift. Here, subjecting matter density today $Ω_{m}$ to a prior, corresponding to a combination of Planck CMB and BAO data, we perform a consistency test of the Planck-$Λ$CDM cosmology and show that $S_8$ determinations from $f σ_8(z)$ constraints increase with effective redshift. Due to the redshift evolution, a $\sim 3 σ$ tension in the $S_8$ parameter with Planck at lower redshifts remarkably becomes consistent with Planck within $1 σ$ at high redshifts. This provides corroborating support for an $S_8$ discrepancy that is physical in origin. We further confirm that the flat $Λ$CDM model is preferred over a theoretically ad hoc model with a jump in $S_8$ at a given redshift. In the absence of the CMB+BAO $Ω_m$ prior, we find that $> 3 σ$ tensions with Planck in low redshift data are ameliorated by shifts in the parameters in high redshift data. Results here and elsewhere suggest that the $Λ$CDM cosmological parameters are redshift dependent. Fitting parameters that evolve with redshift is a recognisable hallmark of model breakdown.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2023; v1 submitted 13 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
On Redshift Evolution & Negative Dark Energy Density in Pantheon+ Supernovae
Authors:
Mohammad Malekjani,
Ruairí Mc Conville,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Saeed Pourojaghi,
M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari
Abstract:
Within the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) framework, the Hubble constant $H_0$ is an integration constant. Thus, consistency of the model demands observational constancy of $H_0$. We demonstrate redshift evolution of best fit $Λ$CDM parameters $(H_0, Ω_{m})$ in Pantheon+ supernove (SNe). Redshift evolution of best fit cosmological parameters is a prerequisite to finding a statistically…
▽ More
Within the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) framework, the Hubble constant $H_0$ is an integration constant. Thus, consistency of the model demands observational constancy of $H_0$. We demonstrate redshift evolution of best fit $Λ$CDM parameters $(H_0, Ω_{m})$ in Pantheon+ supernove (SNe). Redshift evolution of best fit cosmological parameters is a prerequisite to finding a statistically significant evolution as well as identifying alternative models that are competitive with $Λ$CDM in a Bayesian model comparison. To assess statistical significance, we employ three different methods: i) Bayesian model comparison, ii) mock simulations and iii) profile distributions. The first shows a marginal preference for the vanilla $Λ$CDM model over an ad hoc model with 3 additional parameters and an unphysical jump in cosmological parameters at $z=1$. From mock simulations, we estimate the statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters and negative dark energy density ($Ω_m > 1$) to be in the $1-2 σ$ range, depending on the criteria employed. Importantly, in direct comparison to the same analysis with the earlier Pantheon sample we find that statistical significance of redshift evolution of best fit parameters has increased, as expected for a physical effect. Our profile distribution analysis demonstrates a shift in $(H_0, Ω_m)$ in excess of $95\%$ confidence level for SNe with redshifts $z > 1$ and also shows that a degeneracy in MCMC posteriors is not equivalent to a curve of constant $χ^2$. Our findings can be interpreted as a statistical fluctuation or unexplored systematics in Pantheon+ or $Λ$CDM model breakdown. The first two possibilities are disfavoured by similar trends in independent probes.
△ Less
Submitted 21 March, 2024; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Can high-redshift Hubble diagrams rule out the standard model of cosmology in the context of cosmographic method?
Authors:
S. Pourojaghi,
N. F. Zabihi,
M. Malekjani
Abstract:
Using mock data for the Hubble diagrams of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) and quasars (QSOs) generated based on the standard model of cosmology, and using the least-squares method based on the Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, we first put constraints on the cosmographic parameters in the context of the various model-independent cosmographic methods reconstructed from the Taylor $4^{th}$ and…
▽ More
Using mock data for the Hubble diagrams of type Ia supernovae (SNIa) and quasars (QSOs) generated based on the standard model of cosmology, and using the least-squares method based on the Markov-Chain-Monte-Carlo (MCMC) algorithm, we first put constraints on the cosmographic parameters in the context of the various model-independent cosmographic methods reconstructed from the Taylor $4^{th}$ and $5^{th}$ order expansions and the Pade (2,2) and (3,2) polynomials of the Hubble parameter, respectively. We then reconstruct the distance modulus in the framework of cosmographic methods and calculate the percentage difference between the distance modulus of the cosmographic methods and that of the standard model. The percentage difference is minimized when the Pade approximation is used which means that the Pade cosmographic method is sufficiently suitable for reconstructing the distance modulus even at high-redshifts. In the next step, using the real observational data for the Hubble diagrams of SNIa, QSOs, gamma-ray-bursts (GRBs), and observations from baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) in two sets of the low-redshift combination (SNIa+QSOs+GRBs+BAO) embracing the redshift range of $0.01<z<2.26$ and the high-redshift combination (SNIa+QSOs+GRBs) which covers a redshift range of $0.01< z < 5.5$, we put observational constraints on the cosmographic parameters of the Pade cosmography and also the standard model. Our analysis indicates that Pade cosmographic approaches do not reveal any cosmographic tension between the standard model and the observational data. We also confirm this result, using the statistical AIC criteria. Finally, we put the cosmographic method in the redshift-bin data and find a larger value of $Ω_{m0}$ extracted from $s_0$ parameter compared with those of the $q_0$ parameter and Planck-$Λ$CDM values.
△ Less
Submitted 8 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.