The Hydrostatic Mass of A478: Discrepant Results From Chandra, NuSTAR, and XMM-Newton
Authors:
Cicely Potter,
Ayşegül Tümer,
Qian H. S. Wang,
Daniel R. Wik,
Ben J. Maughan,
Gerrit Schellenberger
Abstract:
Galaxy clusters are the most recently formed and most massive, gravitationally bound structures in the universe. The number of galaxy clusters formed is highly dependent on cosmological parameters, such as the dark matter density, $σ_8$, and $Ω_m$. The number density is a function of the cluster mass, which can be estimated from the density and temperature profiles of the intracluster medium (ICM)…
▽ More
Galaxy clusters are the most recently formed and most massive, gravitationally bound structures in the universe. The number of galaxy clusters formed is highly dependent on cosmological parameters, such as the dark matter density, $σ_8$, and $Ω_m$. The number density is a function of the cluster mass, which can be estimated from the density and temperature profiles of the intracluster medium (ICM) under the assumption of hydrostatic equilibrium. The temperature of the plasma, hence its mass, is calculated from the X-ray spectra. However, effective area calibration uncertainties in the soft band result in significantly different temperature measurements from various space-based X-ray telescopes. NuSTAR is potentially less susceptible to these issues than Chandra and XMM-Newton, having larger effective area, particularly at higher energies, enabling high precision temperature measurements. In this work, we present analyses of Chandra, NuSTAR, and XMM-Newton data of Abell 478 to investigate the nature of this calibration discrepancy. We find that NuSTAR temperatures are on average $\sim$11% lower than that of Chandra, and XMM-Newton temperatures are on average $\sim$5% lower than that of NuSTAR. This results in a NuSTAR mass at $r_{2500,Chandra}$ of $M_{2500,NuSTAR}=3.39^{+0.07}_{-0.07}\times10^{14}$ $M_{\odot}$, which is $\sim$10% lower than that of $M_{2500,Chandra}$ and $\sim$4% higher than $M_{2500,XMM-Newton}$.
△ Less
Submitted 20 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
A Systematic Comparison of Galaxy Cluster Temperatures Measured with NuSTAR and Chandra
Authors:
A. N. Wallbank,
B. J. Maughan,
F. Gastaldello,
C. Potter,
D. R. Wik
Abstract:
Temperature measurements of galaxy clusters are used to determine their masses, which in turn are used to determine cosmological parameters. However, systematic differences between the temperatures measured by different telescopes imply a significant source of systematic uncertainty on such mass estimates. We perform the first systematic comparison between cluster temperatures measured with Chandr…
▽ More
Temperature measurements of galaxy clusters are used to determine their masses, which in turn are used to determine cosmological parameters. However, systematic differences between the temperatures measured by different telescopes imply a significant source of systematic uncertainty on such mass estimates. We perform the first systematic comparison between cluster temperatures measured with Chandra and NuSTAR. This provides a useful contribution to the effort of cross-calibrating cluster temperatures due to the harder response of NuSTAR compared with most other observatories. We measure average temperatures for 8 clusters observed with NuSTAR and Chandra. We fit the NuSTAR spectra in a hard (3-10 keV) energy band, and the Chandra spectra in both the hard and a broad (0.6-9 keV) band. We fit a power-law cross-calibration model to the resulting temperatures. At a Chandra temperature of 10 keV, the average NuSTAR temperature was $(10.5 \pm 3.7)\%$ and $(15.7 \pm 4.6)\%$ lower than Chandra for the broad and hard band fits respectively. We explored the impact of systematics from background modelling and multiphase temperature structure of the clusters, and found that these did not affect our results. Our sample are primarily merging clusters with complex thermal structures so are not ideal calibration targets. However, given the harder response of NuSTAR it would be expected to measure a higher average temperature than Chandra for a non-isothermal cluster, so we interpret our measurement as a lower limit on the difference in temperatures between NuSTAR and Chandra.
△ Less
Submitted 1 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
