Phased Array Feed Calibration, Beamforming and Imaging
Authors:
Jonathan Landon,
Michael Elmer,
Jacob Waldron,
David Jones,
Alan Stemmons,
Brian D. Jeffs,
Karl F. Warnick,
J. Richard Fisher,
Roger D. Norrod
Abstract:
Phased array feeds (PAFs) for reflector antennas offer the potential for increased reflector field of view and faster survey speeds. To address some of the development challenges that remain for scientifically useful PAFs, including calibration and beamforming algorithms, sensitivity optimization, and demonstration of wide field of view imaging, we report experimental results from a 19 element r…
▽ More
Phased array feeds (PAFs) for reflector antennas offer the potential for increased reflector field of view and faster survey speeds. To address some of the development challenges that remain for scientifically useful PAFs, including calibration and beamforming algorithms, sensitivity optimization, and demonstration of wide field of view imaging, we report experimental results from a 19 element room temperature L-band PAF mounted on the Green Bank 20-Meter Telescope. Formed beams achieved an aperture efficiency of 69% and system noise temperature of 66 K. Radio camera images of several sky regions are presented. We investigate the noise performance and sensitivity of the system as a function of elevation angle with statistically optimal beamforming and demonstrate cancelation of radio frequency interference sources with adaptive spatial filtering.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2009;
originally announced December 2009.
Large Instrument Development for Radio Astronomy
Authors:
J. R. Fisher,
R. F. Bradley,
W. F. Brisken,
W. D. Cotton,
D. T. Emerson,
A. R. Kerr,
R. J. Lacasse,
M. A. Morgan,
P. J. Napier,
R. D. Norrod,
J. M. Payne,
M. W. Pospieszalski,
A. Symmes,
A. R. Thompson,
J. C. Webber
Abstract:
This white paper offers cautionary observations about the planning and development of new, large radio astronomy instruments. Complexity is a strong cost driver so every effort should be made to assign differing science requirements to different instruments and probably different sites. The appeal of shared resources is generally not realized in practice and can often be counterproductive. Instr…
▽ More
This white paper offers cautionary observations about the planning and development of new, large radio astronomy instruments. Complexity is a strong cost driver so every effort should be made to assign differing science requirements to different instruments and probably different sites. The appeal of shared resources is generally not realized in practice and can often be counterproductive. Instrument optimization is much more difficult with longer lists of requirements, and the development process is longer and less efficient. More complex instruments are necessarily further behind the technology state of the art because of longer development times. Including technology R&D in the construction phase of projects is a growing trend that leads to higher risks, cost overruns, schedule delays, and project de-scoping. There are no technology breakthroughs just over the horizon that will suddenly bring down the cost of collecting area. Advances come largely through careful attention to detail in the adoption of new technology provided by industry and the commercial market. Radio astronomy instrumentation has a very bright future, but a vigorous long-term R&D program not tied directly to specific projects needs to be restored, fostered, and preserved.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
