Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Nord, B D

The Dark Energy Survey Six-Year Calibration Star Catalog

Authors: E. S. Rykoff, D. L. Tucker, D. L. Burke, S. S. Allam, K. Bechtol, G. M. Bernstein, D. Brout, R. A. Gruendl, J. Lasker, J. A. Smith, W. C. Wester, B. Yanny, T. M. C. Abbott, M. Aguena, O. Alves, F. Andrade-Oliveira, J. Annis, D. Bacon, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, A. Carnero Rosell, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, A. Choi, L. N. da Costa , et al. (42 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: This Technical Note presents a catalog of calibrated reference stars that was generated by the Forward Calibration Method (FGCM) pipeline (arXiv:1706.01542) as part of the FGCM photometric calibration of the full Dark Energy Survey (DES) 6-Year data set (Y6). This catalog provides DES grizY magnitudes for 17 million stars with i-band magnitudes mostly in the range 16 < i < 21 spread over the full… ▽ More This Technical Note presents a catalog of calibrated reference stars that was generated by the Forward Calibration Method (FGCM) pipeline (arXiv:1706.01542) as part of the FGCM photometric calibration of the full Dark Energy Survey (DES) 6-Year data set (Y6). This catalog provides DES grizY magnitudes for 17 million stars with i-band magnitudes mostly in the range 16 < i < 21 spread over the full DES footprint covering 5000 square degrees over the Southern Galactic Cap at galactic latitudes b < -20 degrees (plus a few outlying fields disconnected from the main survey footprint). These stars are calibrated to a uniformity of better than 1.8 milli-mag (0.18%) RMS over the survey area. The absolute calibration of the catalog is computed with reference to the STISNIC.007 spectrum of the Hubble Space Telescope CalSpec standard star C26202; including systematic errors, the absolute flux system is known at the approximately 1% level. As such, these stars provide a useful reference catalog for calibrating grizY-band or grizY-like band photometry in the Southern Hemisphere, particularly for observations within the DES footprint. △ Less

Submitted 2 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: 21 pages, 15 figures, Fermilab Technical Note. Official Data Access Site: https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/other ; Temporary Data Access Site: https://data.darkenergysurvey.org/public_calib/DES_6yr_CalibStarCat/index.html

Report number: FERMILAB-TM-2784-PPD-SCD

Astro2020 APC White Paper: Elevating the Role of Software as a Product of the Research Enterprise

Authors: Arfon M. Smith, Dara Norman, Kelle Cruz, Vandana Desai, Eric Bellm, Britt Lundgren, Frossie Economou, Brian D. Nord, Chad Schafer, Gautham Narayan, Joseph Harrington, Erik Tollerud, Brigitta Sipőcz, Timothy Pickering, Molly S. Peeples, Bruce Berriman, Peter Teuben, David Rodriguez, Andre Gradvohl, Lior Shamir, Alice Allen, Joel R. Brownstein, Adam Ginsburg, Manodeep Sinha, Cameron Hummels , et al. (20 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Software is a critical part of modern research, and yet there are insufficient mechanisms in the scholarly ecosystem to acknowledge, cite, and measure the impact of research software. The majority of academic fields rely on a one-dimensional credit model whereby academic articles (and their associated citations) are the dominant factor in the success of a researcher's career. In the petabyte era o… ▽ More Software is a critical part of modern research, and yet there are insufficient mechanisms in the scholarly ecosystem to acknowledge, cite, and measure the impact of research software. The majority of academic fields rely on a one-dimensional credit model whereby academic articles (and their associated citations) are the dominant factor in the success of a researcher's career. In the petabyte era of astronomical science, citing software and measuring its impact enables academia to retain and reward researchers that make significant software contributions. These highly skilled researchers must be retained to maximize the scientific return from petabyte-scale datasets. Evolving beyond the one-dimensional credit model requires overcoming several key challenges, including the current scholarly ecosystem and scientific culture issues. This white paper will present these challenges and suggest practical solutions for elevating the role of software as a product of the research enterprise. △ Less

Submitted 14 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1905.05116

Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data

Authors: P. Melchior, E. Suchyta, E. Huff, M. Hirsch, T. Kacprzak, E. Rykoff, D. Gruen, R. Armstrong, D. Bacon, K. Bechtol, G. M. Bernstein, S. Bridle, J. Clampitt, K. Honscheid, B. Jain, S. Jouvel, E. Krause, H. Lin, N. MacCrann, K. Patton, A. Plazas, B. Rowe, V. Vikram, H. Wilcox, J. Young , et al. (67 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We measure the weak-lensing masses and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters observed during the Science Verification phase of the Dark Energy Survey. This pathfinder study is meant to 1) validate the DECam imager for the task of measuring weak-lensing shapes, and 2) utilize DECam's large field of view to map out the clusters and their environments over 90 arcmin. We conduct a serie… ▽ More We measure the weak-lensing masses and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters observed during the Science Verification phase of the Dark Energy Survey. This pathfinder study is meant to 1) validate the DECam imager for the task of measuring weak-lensing shapes, and 2) utilize DECam's large field of view to map out the clusters and their environments over 90 arcmin. We conduct a series of rigorous tests on astrometry, photometry, image quality, PSF modeling, and shear measurement accuracy to single out flaws in the data and also to identify the optimal data processing steps and parameters. We find Science Verification data from DECam to be suitable for the lensing analysis described in this paper. The PSF is generally well-behaved, but the modeling is rendered difficult by a flux-dependent PSF width and ellipticity. We employ photometric redshifts to distinguish between foreground and background galaxies, and a red-sequence cluster finder to provide cluster richness estimates and cluster-galaxy distributions. By fitting NFW profiles to the clusters in this study, we determine weak-lensing masses that are in agreement with previous work. For Abell 3261, we provide the first estimates of redshift, weak-lensing mass, and richness. In addition, the cluster-galaxy distributions indicate the presence of filamentary structures attached to 1E 0657-56 and RXC J2248.7-4431, stretching out as far as 1 degree (approximately 20 Mpc), showcasing the potential of DECam and DES for detailed studies of degree-scale features on the sky. △ Less

Submitted 28 February, 2015; v1 submitted 16 May, 2014; originally announced May 2014.

Comments: accepted by MNRAS; high-resolution versions of figures can be downloaded from https://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~melchior.12/research/des_sv_clusters.html

Generalised Fisher Matrices

Authors: A. F. Heavens, M. Seikel, B. D. Nord, M. Aich, Y. Bouffanais, B. A. Bassett, M. P. Hobson

Abstract: The Fisher Information Matrix formalism is extended to cases where the data is divided into two parts (X,Y), where the expectation value of Y depends on X according to some theoretical model, and X and Y both have errors with arbitrary covariance. In the simplest case, (X,Y) represent data pairs of abscissa and ordinate, in which case the analysis deals with the case of data pairs with errors in b… ▽ More The Fisher Information Matrix formalism is extended to cases where the data is divided into two parts (X,Y), where the expectation value of Y depends on X according to some theoretical model, and X and Y both have errors with arbitrary covariance. In the simplest case, (X,Y) represent data pairs of abscissa and ordinate, in which case the analysis deals with the case of data pairs with errors in both coordinates, but X can be any measured quantities on which Y depends. The analysis applies for arbitrary covariance, provided all errors are gaussian, and provided the errors in X are small, both in comparison with the scale over which the expected signal Y changes, and with the width of the prior distribution. This generalises the Fisher Matrix approach, which normally only considers errors in the `ordinate' Y. In this work, we include errors in X by marginalising over latent variables, effectively employing a Bayesian hierarchical model, and deriving the Fisher Matrix for this more general case. The methods here also extend to likelihood surfaces which are not gaussian in the parameter space, and so techniques such as DALI (Derivative Approximation for Likelihoods) can be generalised straightforwardly to include arbitrary gaussian data error covariances. For simple mock data and theoretical models, we compare to Markov Chain Monte Carlo experiments, illustrating the method with cosmological supernova data. We also include the new method in the Fisher4Cast software. △ Less

Submitted 14 September, 2014; v1 submitted 10 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Comments: Analysis generalised; now more powerful. Accepted by MNRAS

Journal ref: MNRAS, (2014) Vol. 445 : 1687-1693