Temporal Variations of the Three Geomagnetic Field Components at Colaba Observatory around the Carrington Storm in 1859
Authors:
Hisashi Hayakawa,
Heikki Nevanlinna,
Séan P. Blake,
Yusuke Ebihara,
Ankush T. Bhaskar,
Yoshizumi Miyoshi
Abstract:
The Carrington storm in 1859 September has been arguably identified as the greatest geomagnetic storm ever recorded. However, its exact magnitude and chronology remain controversial, while their source data have been derived from the Colaba H magnetometer. Here, we have located the Colaba 1859 yearbook, containing hourly measurements and spot measurements. We have reconstructed the Colaba geomagne…
▽ More
The Carrington storm in 1859 September has been arguably identified as the greatest geomagnetic storm ever recorded. However, its exact magnitude and chronology remain controversial, while their source data have been derived from the Colaba H magnetometer. Here, we have located the Colaba 1859 yearbook, containing hourly measurements and spot measurements. We have reconstructed the Colaba geomagnetic disturbances in the horizontal component (ΔH), the eastward component (ΔY), and the vertical component (ΔZ) around the time of the Carrington storm. On their basis, we have chronologically revised the ICME transit time as =< 17.1 hrs and located the ΔH peak at 06:20 -- 06:25 UT, revealing a magnitude discrepancy between the hourly and spot measurements (-1691 nT vs. -1263 nT). Furthermore, we have newly derived the time series of ΔY and ΔZ, which peaked at ΔY ~ 378 nT (05:50 UT) and 377 nT (06:25 UT), and ΔZ ~ -173 nT (06:40 UT). We have also computed the hourly averages and removed the solar quiet (Sq) field variations from each geomagnetic component to derive their hourly variations with latitudinal weighting. Our calculations have resulted in the disturbance variations (Dist) with latitudinal weighting of Dist Y ~ 328 nT and Dist Z ~ -36 nT, and three scenarios of Dist H ~ -918, -979, and -949 nT, which also approximate the minimum Dst. These data may suggest preconditioning of the geomagnetic field after the August storm (ΔH =< -570 nT), which made the September storm even more geoeffective.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
Tests of Sunspot Number Sequences: 2. Using Geomagnetic and Auroral Data
Authors:
Mike Lockwood,
Mathew J. Owens,
Luke A Barnard,
Chris J. Scott,
Ilya G. Usoskin,
Heikki Nevanlinna
Abstract:
We compare four sunspot-number data sequences against geomagnetic and terrestrial auroral observations. The comparisons are made for the original SIDC composite of Wolf-Zurich-International sunspot number [$R_{ISNv1}$], the group sunspot number [$R_{G}$] by Hoyt and Schatten (Solar Phys., 1998), the new "backbone" group sunspot number [$R_{BB}$] by Svalgaard and Schatten (Solar Phys., 2016), and t…
▽ More
We compare four sunspot-number data sequences against geomagnetic and terrestrial auroral observations. The comparisons are made for the original SIDC composite of Wolf-Zurich-International sunspot number [$R_{ISNv1}$], the group sunspot number [$R_{G}$] by Hoyt and Schatten (Solar Phys., 1998), the new "backbone" group sunspot number [$R_{BB}$] by Svalgaard and Schatten (Solar Phys., 2016), and the "corrected" sunspot number [$R_{C}$] by Lockwood at al. (J.G.R., 2014). Each sunspot number is fitted with terrestrial observations, or parameters derived from terrestrial observations to be linearly proportional to sunspot number, over a 30-year calibration interval of 1982-2012. The fits are then used to compute test sequences, which extend further back in time and which are compared to $R_{ISNv1}$, $R_{G}$, $R_{BB}$, and $R_{C}$. To study the long-term trends, comparisons are made using averages over whole solar cycles (minimum-to-minimum). The test variations are generated in four ways: i) using the IDV(1d) and IDV geomagnetic indices (for 1845-2013) fitted over the calibration interval using the various sunspot numbers and the phase of the solar cycle; ii) from the open solar flux (OSF) generated for 1845 - 2013 from four pairings of geomagnetic indices by Lockwood et al. (Ann. Geophys., 2014) and analysed using the OSF continuity model of Solanki at al. (Nature, 2000) which employs a constant fractional OSF loss rate; iii) the same OSF data analysed using the OSF continuity model of Owens and Lockwood (J.G.R., 2012) in which the fractional loss rate varies with the tilt of the heliospheric current sheet and hence with the phase of the solar cycle; iv) the occurrence frequency of low-latitude aurora for 1780-1980 from the survey of Legrand and Simon (Ann. Geophys., 1987). For all cases, $R_{BB}$ exceeds the test terrestrial series by an amount that increases as one goes back in time.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2016;
originally announced May 2016.
