-
On the use of relative field line helicity as an indicator for solar eruptivity
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
S. Patsourakos,
A. Nindos,
J. K. Thalmann,
É. Pariat
Abstract:
Context. Relative field line helicity (RFLH) is a recently developed quantity which can approximate the density of relative magnetic helicity. Aims. This paper aims to determine whether RFLH can be used as an indicator of solar eruptivity. Methods. Starting from magnetographic observations from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager instrument onboard the Solar Dynamic Observatory of a sample of sev…
▽ More
Context. Relative field line helicity (RFLH) is a recently developed quantity which can approximate the density of relative magnetic helicity. Aims. This paper aims to determine whether RFLH can be used as an indicator of solar eruptivity. Methods. Starting from magnetographic observations from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager instrument onboard the Solar Dynamic Observatory of a sample of seven solar active regions (ARs), which comprises over 2000 individual snapshots, we reconstruct the AR's coronal magnetic field with a widely-used non-linear force-free method. This enables us to compute RFLH using two independent gauge conditions for the vector potentials. We focus our study around the times of strong flares in the ARs, above the M class, and in regions around the polarity inversion lines (PILs) of the magnetic field, and of RFLH. Results. We find that the temporal profiles of the relative helicity that is contained in the magnetic PIL follow those of the relative helicity that is computed by the accurate volume method for the whole AR. Additionally, the PIL relative helicity can be used to define a parameter similar to the well-known parameter R (Schrijver 2007), whose high values are related with increased flaring probability. This helicity-based R-parameter correlates well with the original one, showing in some cases even higher values, and additionally, it experiences more pronounced decreases during flares. This means that there exists at least one parameter deduced from RFLH, that has important value as a solar eruptivity indicator.
△ Less
Submitted 21 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar magnetic field. Part IV: Application to solar observations
Authors:
J. K. Thalmann,
M. K. Georgoulis,
Y. Liu,
E. Pariat,
G. Valori,
S. Anfinogentov,
F. Chen,
Y. Guo,
K. Moraitis,
S. Yang,
A. Mastrano
Abstract:
In this ISSI-supported series of studies on magnetic helicity in the Sun, we systematically implement different magnetic helicity calculation methods on high-quality solar magnetogram observations. We apply finite-volume, discrete flux tube (in particular, connectivity-based) and flux-integration methods to data from Hinode's Solar Optical Telescope. The target is NOAA active region 10930 during a…
▽ More
In this ISSI-supported series of studies on magnetic helicity in the Sun, we systematically implement different magnetic helicity calculation methods on high-quality solar magnetogram observations. We apply finite-volume, discrete flux tube (in particular, connectivity-based) and flux-integration methods to data from Hinode's Solar Optical Telescope. The target is NOAA active region 10930 during a ~1.5 day interval in December 2006 that included a major eruptive flare (SOL2006-12-13T02:14X3.4). Finite-volume and connectivity-based methods yield instantaneous budgets of the coronal magnetic helicity, while the flux-integration methods allow an estimate of the accumulated helicity injected through the photosphere. The objectives of our work are twofold: A cross-validation of methods, as well as an interpretation of the complex events leading to the eruption. To the first objective, we find (i) strong agreement among the finite-volume methods, (ii) a moderate agreement between the connectivity-based and finite-volume methods, (iii) an excellent agreement between the flux-integration methods, and (iv) an overall agreement between finite-volume and flux-integration based estimates regarding the predominant sign and magnitude of the helicity. To the second objective, we are confident that the photospheric helicity flux significantly contributed to the coronal helicity budget, and that a right-handed structure erupted from a predominantly left-handed corona during the X-class flare. Overall, we find that the use of different methods to estimate the (accumulated) coronal helicity may be necessary in order to draw a complete picture of an active-region corona, given the careful handling of identified data (preparation) issues, which otherwise would mislead the event analysis and interpretation.
△ Less
Submitted 19 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Relative field line helicity of a large eruptive solar active region
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
S. Patsourakos,
A. Nindos
Abstract:
Context. Magnetic helicity is a physical quantity of great importance in the study of astrophysical and natural plasmas. Although a density for helicity cannot be defined, a good proxy for it is field line helicity. The appropriate quantity for use in solar conditions is relative field line helicity (RFLH). Aims. This work aims to study in detail the behaviour of RFLH, for the first time, in a sol…
▽ More
Context. Magnetic helicity is a physical quantity of great importance in the study of astrophysical and natural plasmas. Although a density for helicity cannot be defined, a good proxy for it is field line helicity. The appropriate quantity for use in solar conditions is relative field line helicity (RFLH). Aims. This work aims to study in detail the behaviour of RFLH, for the first time, in a solar active region (AR). Methods. The target active region is the large, eruptive AR 11158. In order to compute RFLH and all other quantities of interest we use a non-linear force-free reconstruction of the AR coronal magnetic field of excelent quality. Results. We find that the photospheric morphology of RFLH is quite different than that of the magnetic field or of the electrical current, and this is not sensitive to the chosen gauge in the computation of RFLH. The value of helicity experiences a large decrease, 25% of its pre-flare value, during an X-class flare of the AR, a change that is also depicted in the photospheric morphology of RFLH. Moreover, the area of this change coincides with the area that encompasses the flux rope, the magnetic structure that later erupted. Conclusions. The use of RFLH can provide important information about the value and location of the magnetic helicity expelled from the solar atmosphere during eruptive events.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
The Solar Orbiter Science Activity Plan: translating solar and heliospheric physics questions into action
Authors:
I. Zouganelis,
A. De Groof,
A. P. Walsh,
D. R. Williams,
D. Mueller,
O. C. St Cyr,
F. Auchere,
D. Berghmans,
A. Fludra,
T. S. Horbury,
R. A. Howard,
S. Krucker,
M. Maksimovic,
C. J. Owen,
J. Rodriiguez-Pacheco,
M. Romoli,
S. K. Solanki,
C. Watson,
L. Sanchez,
J. Lefort,
P. Osuna,
H. R. Gilbert,
T. Nieves-Chinchilla,
L. Abbo,
O. Alexandrova
, et al. (160 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Solar Orbiter is the first space mission observing the solar plasma both in situ and remotely, from a close distance, in and out of the ecliptic. The ultimate goal is to understand how the Sun produces and controls the heliosphere, filling the Solar System and driving the planetary environments. With six remote-sensing and four in-situ instrument suites, the coordination and planning of the operat…
▽ More
Solar Orbiter is the first space mission observing the solar plasma both in situ and remotely, from a close distance, in and out of the ecliptic. The ultimate goal is to understand how the Sun produces and controls the heliosphere, filling the Solar System and driving the planetary environments. With six remote-sensing and four in-situ instrument suites, the coordination and planning of the operations are essential to address the following four top-level science questions: (1) What drives the solar wind and where does the coronal magnetic field originate? (2) How do solar transients drive heliospheric variability? (3) How do solar eruptions produce energetic particle radiation that fills the heliosphere? (4) How does the solar dynamo work and drive connections between the Sun and the heliosphere? Maximising the mission's science return requires considering the characteristics of each orbit, including the relative position of the spacecraft to Earth (affecting downlink rates), trajectory events (such as gravitational assist manoeuvres), and the phase of the solar activity cycle. Furthermore, since each orbit's science telemetry will be downloaded over the course of the following orbit, science operations must be planned at mission level, rather than at the level of individual orbits. It is important to explore the way in which those science questions are translated into an actual plan of observations that fits into the mission, thus ensuring that no opportunities are missed. First, the overarching goals are broken down into specific, answerable questions along with the required observations and the so-called Science Activity Plan (SAP) is developed to achieve this. The SAP groups objectives that require similar observations into Solar Orbiter Observing Plans (SOOPs), resulting in a strategic, top-level view of the optimal opportunities for science observations during the mission lifetime.
△ Less
Submitted 22 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Deducing the reliability of relative helicities from nonlinear force-free coronal models
Authors:
Julia K. Thalmann,
X. Sun,
K. Moraitis,
M. Gupta
Abstract:
We study the relative helicity of active region (AR) NOAA~12673 during a ten-hour time interval centered around a preceding X2.2 flare (SOL2017-09-06T08:57) and also including an eruptive X9.3 flare that occurred three hours later (SOL2017-09-06T11:53). In particular, we aim for a reliable estimate of the normalized self-helicity of the current-carrying magnetic field, the so-called helicity ratio…
▽ More
We study the relative helicity of active region (AR) NOAA~12673 during a ten-hour time interval centered around a preceding X2.2 flare (SOL2017-09-06T08:57) and also including an eruptive X9.3 flare that occurred three hours later (SOL2017-09-06T11:53). In particular, we aim for a reliable estimate of the normalized self-helicity of the current-carrying magnetic field, the so-called helicity ratio $|H_{\mathrm{J}}|/|H_{\mathcal{V}}|$, a promising candidate to quantity the eruptive potential of solar ARs. Using SDO/HMI vector magnetic field data as an input, we employ nonlinear force-free (NLFF) coronal magnetic field models using an optimization approach. The corresponding relative helicity, and related quantities, are computed using a finite-volume method. From multiple time series of NLFF models based on different choices of free model parameters, we are able to assess the spread of $|H_{\mathrm{J}}|/|H_{\mathcal{V}}|$, and to estimate its uncertainty. In comparison to earlier works, which identified the non-solenoidal contribution to the total magnetic energy, $E_{\rm div}/E$, as selection criterion regarding the required solenoidal quality of magnetic field models for subsequent relative helicity analysis, we propose to use in addition the non-solenoidal contribution to the free magnetic energy, $|E_{\rm mix}|/E_{\mathrm{J,s}}$. As a recipe for a reliable estimate of the relative magnetic helicity (and related quantities), we recommend to employ multiple NLFF models based on different combinations of free model parameters, to retain only those that exhibit smallest values of both $E_{\rm div}/E$ and $|E_{\rm mix}|/E_{\mathrm{J,s}}$ at a certain time instant, to subsequently compute mean estimates, and to use the spread of the individually contributing values as an indication for the uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2020; v1 submitted 11 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Additivity of relative magnetic helicity in finite volumes
Authors:
Gherardo Valori,
Pascal Démoulin,
Etienne Pariat,
Anthony Yeates,
Kostas Moraitis,
Luis Linan
Abstract:
Relative magnetic helicity is conserved by magneto-hydrodynamic evolution even in the presence of moderate resistivity. For that reason, it is often invoked as the most relevant constraint to the dynamical evolution of plasmas in complex systems, such as solar and stellar dynamos, photospheric flux emergence, solar eruptions, and relaxation processes in laboratory plasmas. However, such studies of…
▽ More
Relative magnetic helicity is conserved by magneto-hydrodynamic evolution even in the presence of moderate resistivity. For that reason, it is often invoked as the most relevant constraint to the dynamical evolution of plasmas in complex systems, such as solar and stellar dynamos, photospheric flux emergence, solar eruptions, and relaxation processes in laboratory plasmas. However, such studies often indirectly imply that relative magnetic helicity in a given spatial domain can be algebraically split into the helicity contributions of the composing subvolumes, i.e., that it is an additive quantity. A limited number of very specific applications have shown that this is not the case. Progress in understanding the non-additivity of relative magnetic helicity requires removal of restrictive assumptions in favour of a general formalism that can be used both in theoretical investigations as well as in numerical applications. We derive the analytical gauge-invariant expression for the partition of relative magnetic helicity between contiguous finite-volumes, without any assumptions on either the shape of the volumes and interface, or the employed gauge. The non-additivity of relative magnetic helicity in finite volumes is proven in the most general, gauge-invariant formalism, and verified numerically. More restrictive assumptions are adopted to derive known specific approximations, yielding a unified view of the additivity issue. As an example, the case of a flux rope embedded in a potential field shows that the non-additivity term in the partition equation is, in general, non-negligible. The relative helicity partition formula can be applied to numerical simulations to precisely quantify the effect of non-additivity on global helicity budgets of complex physical processes.
△ Less
Submitted 3 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Energy and helicity fluxes in line-tied eruptive simulations
Authors:
Luis Linan,
Étienne Pariat,
Guillaume Aulanier,
Kostas Moraitis,
Gherardo Valori
Abstract:
Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-li…
▽ More
Based on a decomposition of the magnetic field into potential and nonpotential components, magnetic energy and relative helicity can both also be decomposed into two quantities: potential and free energies, and volume-threading and current-carrying helicities. In this study, we perform a coupled analysis of their behaviors in a set of parametric 3D magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulations of solar-like eruptions. We present the general formulations for the time-varying components of energy and helicity in resistive MHD. We calculated them numerically with a specific gauge, and compared their behaviors in the numerical simulations, which differ from one another by their imposed boundary-driving motions. Thus, we investigated the impact of different active regions surface flows on the development of the energy and helicity-related quantities. Despite general similarities in their overall behaviors, helicities and energies display different evolutions that cannot be explained in a unique framework. While the energy fluxes are similar in all simulations, the physical mechanisms that govern the evolution of the helicities are markedly distinct from one simulation to another: the evolution of volume-threading helicity can be governed by boundary fluxes or helicity transfer, depending on the simulation. The eruption takes place for the same value of the ratio of the current-carrying helicity to the total helicity in all simulations. However, our study highlights that this threshold can be reached in different ways, with different helicity-related processes dominating for different photospheric flows. This means that the details of the pre-eruptive dynamics do not influence the eruption-onset helicity-related threshold. Nevertheless, the helicity-flux dynamics may be more or less efficient in changing the time required to reach the onset of the eruption.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Magnetic helicity budget of solar active regions prolific of eruptive and confined flares
Authors:
J. K. Thalmann,
K. Moraitis,
L. Linan,
E. Pariat,
G. Valori,
K. Dalmasse
Abstract:
We compare the coronal magnetic energy and helicity of two solar active regions (ARs), prolific in major eruptive (AR~11158) and confined (AR~12192) flaring, and analyze the potential of deduced proxies to forecast upcoming flares. Based on nonlinear force-free (NLFF) coronal magnetic field models with a high degree of solenoidality, and applying three different computational methods to investigat…
▽ More
We compare the coronal magnetic energy and helicity of two solar active regions (ARs), prolific in major eruptive (AR~11158) and confined (AR~12192) flaring, and analyze the potential of deduced proxies to forecast upcoming flares. Based on nonlinear force-free (NLFF) coronal magnetic field models with a high degree of solenoidality, and applying three different computational methods to investigate the coronal magnetic helicity, we are able to draw conclusions with a high level of confidence. Based on real observations of two solar ARs we checked trends regarding the potential eruptivity of the active-region corona, as suggested earlier in works that were based on numerical simulations, or solar observations. Our results support that the ratio of current-carrying to total helicity, $|H_\mathrm{J}|/|H_\mathrm{V}|$, shows a strong ability to indicate the eruptive potential of a solar AR. However, $|H_\mathrm{J}|/|H_\mathrm{V}|$ seems not to be indicative for the magnitude or type of an upcoming flare (confined or eruptive). Interpreted in context with earlier observational studies, our findings furthermore support that the total relative helicity normalized to the magnetic flux at the NLFF model's lower boundary, $H_\mathrm{V}/φ^2$, represents no indicator for the eruptivity.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Magnetic helicity and eruptivity in active region 12673
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
X. Sun,
E. Pariat,
L. Linan
Abstract:
Context. In September 2017 the largest X-class flare of Solar Cycle 24 occurred from the most active region (AR) of this cycle, AR 12673. The AR attracted much interest because of its unique morphological and evolution characteristics. Among the parameters examined in the AR was magnetic helicity, but either only approximately, and/or intermittently. Aims. This work is interested in studying the e…
▽ More
Context. In September 2017 the largest X-class flare of Solar Cycle 24 occurred from the most active region (AR) of this cycle, AR 12673. The AR attracted much interest because of its unique morphological and evolution characteristics. Among the parameters examined in the AR was magnetic helicity, but either only approximately, and/or intermittently. Aims. This work is interested in studying the evolution of the relative magnetic helicity and of the two components of its decomposition, the non-potential, and the volume-threading one, in the time interval around the highest activity of AR 12673. Special emphasis is given on the study of the ratio of the non-potential to total helicity, that was recently proposed as an indicator of ARs eruptivity. Methods. For these, we first approximate the coronal magnetic field of the AR with two different optimization-based extrapolation procedures, and choose the one that produces the most reliable helicity value at each instant. Moreover, in one of these methods, we weight the optimization by the uncertainty estimates derived from the Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager (HMI) instrument, for the first time. We then follow an accurate method to compute all quantities of interest. Results. The first observational determination of the evolution of the non-potential to total helicity ratio seems to confirm the quality it has in indicating eruptivity. This ratio increases before the major flares of AR 12673, and afterwards it relaxes to smaller values. Additionally, the evolution patterns of the various helicity, and energy budgets of AR 12673 are discussed and compared with other works.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Relative magnetic field line helicity
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
E. Pariat,
G. Valori,
K. Dalmasse
Abstract:
Context. Magnetic helicity is an important quantity in studies of magnetized plasmas as it provides a measure of the geometrical complexity of the magnetic field in a given volume. A more detailed description of the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity is given by the field line helicity that expresses the amount of helicity associated to individual field lines, rather than in the full analys…
▽ More
Context. Magnetic helicity is an important quantity in studies of magnetized plasmas as it provides a measure of the geometrical complexity of the magnetic field in a given volume. A more detailed description of the spatial distribution of magnetic helicity is given by the field line helicity that expresses the amount of helicity associated to individual field lines, rather than in the full analysed volume. Aims. Magnetic helicity is not a gauge-invariant quantity in general, unless it is computed with respect to a reference field, yielding the so called relative magnetic helicity. The field line helicity corresponding to the relative magnetic helicity has only been examined under specific conditions so far. This work aims to define the field line helicity corresponding to relative magnetic helicity in the most general way. In addition to its general form, we provide the expression for the relative magnetic field line helicity in a few commonly used gauges, and reproduce known results as a limit of our general formulation. Methods. By starting from the definition of relative magnetic helicity, we derive the corresponding field line helicity, and we note the assumptions it is based on. Results. We check that the developed quantity reproduces relative magnetic helicity by using three different numerical simulations. For these cases we also show the morphology of field line helicity in the volume, and on the photospheric plane. As an application to solar situations, we compare the morphology of field line helicity on the photosphere with that of the connectivity-based helicity flux density in two reconstructions of an active region's magnetic field. We discuss how the derived relative magnetic field line helicity has a wide range of applications, notably in solar physics and magnetic reconnection studies.
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Time variations of the non-potential and volume-threading magnetic helicities
Authors:
Luis Linan,
Étienne Pariat,
Kostas Moraitis,
Gherardo Valori,
James E. Leake
Abstract:
Relative magnetic helicity is a gauge invariant quantity suitable for the study of the magnetic helicity content of heliospheric plasmas. Relative magnetic helicity can be decomposed uniquely into two gauge invariant quantities, the magnetic helicity of the non-potential component of the field, and a complementary volume-threading helicity. Recent analysis of numerical experiments simulating the g…
▽ More
Relative magnetic helicity is a gauge invariant quantity suitable for the study of the magnetic helicity content of heliospheric plasmas. Relative magnetic helicity can be decomposed uniquely into two gauge invariant quantities, the magnetic helicity of the non-potential component of the field, and a complementary volume-threading helicity. Recent analysis of numerical experiments simulating the generation of solar eruptions have shown that the ratio of the non-potential helicity to the total relative helicity is a clear marker of the eruptivity of the magnetic system, and that the high value of that quantity could be a sufficient condition for the onset of the instability generating the eruptions. The present study introduces the first analytical examination of the time variations of these non-potential and volume-threading helicities. The validity of the analytical formulas derived are confirmed with analysis of three-dimensional (3D) magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) simulations of solar coronal dynamics. Both the analytical investigation, and the numerical application show that, unlike magnetic helicity, the non-potential and the volume-threading helicities are not conserved quantities, even in the ideal MHD regime. A term corresponding to the transformation between the non-potential and volume-threading helicities frequently dominates their dynamics. This finding has an important consequence for their estimation in the solar corona: unlike with relative helicity, their volume coronal evolution cannot be ascertained by the flux of these quantities through the volume's boundaries. Only techniques extrapolating the 3D coronal field will enable both the proper study of the non-potential and volume-threading helicities, and the observational analysis of helicity-based solar-eruptivity proxies.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Computation of Relative Magnetic Helicity in Spherical Coordinates
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
É. Pariat,
A. Savcheva,
G. Valori
Abstract:
Magnetic helicity is a quantity of great importance in solar studies because it is conserved in ideal magneto-hydrodynamics. While many methods to compute magnetic helicity in Cartesian finite volumes exist, in spherical coordinates, the natural coordinate system for solar applications, helicity is only treated approximately. We present here a method to properly compute relative magnetic helicity…
▽ More
Magnetic helicity is a quantity of great importance in solar studies because it is conserved in ideal magneto-hydrodynamics. While many methods to compute magnetic helicity in Cartesian finite volumes exist, in spherical coordinates, the natural coordinate system for solar applications, helicity is only treated approximately. We present here a method to properly compute relative magnetic helicity in spherical geometry. The volumes considered are finite, of shell or wedge shape, and the three-dimensional magnetic field is considered fully known throughout the studied domain. Testing of the method with well-known, semi-analytic, force-free magnetic-field models reveals that it has excellent accuracy. Further application to a set of nonlinear force-free reconstructions of the magnetic field of solar active regions, and comparison with an approximate method used in the past, indicates that the proposed methodology can be significantly more accurate, thus making our method a promising tool in helicity studies that employ the spherical geometry. Additionally, the range of applicability of the approximate method is determined and discussed.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Magnetic Helicity Estimations in Models and Observations of the Solar Magnetic Field. Part III: Twist Number Method
Authors:
Y. Guo,
E. Pariat,
G. Valori,
S. Anfinogentov,
F. Chen,
M. Georgoulis,
Y. Liu,
K. Moraitis,
J. K. Thalmann,
S. Yang
Abstract:
We study the writhe, twist and magnetic helicity of different magnetic flux ropes, based on models of the solar coronal magnetic field structure. These include an analytical force-free Titov--Démoulin equilibrium solution, non force-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and nonlinear force-free magnetic field models. The geometrical boundary of the magnetic flux rope is determined by the quasi-sep…
▽ More
We study the writhe, twist and magnetic helicity of different magnetic flux ropes, based on models of the solar coronal magnetic field structure. These include an analytical force-free Titov--Démoulin equilibrium solution, non force-free magnetohydrodynamic simulations, and nonlinear force-free magnetic field models. The geometrical boundary of the magnetic flux rope is determined by the quasi-separatrix layer and the bottom surface, and the axis curve of the flux rope is determined by its overall orientation. The twist is computed by the Berger--Prior formula that is suitable for arbitrary geometry and both force-free and non-force-free models. The magnetic helicity is estimated by the twist multiplied by the square of the axial magnetic flux. We compare the obtained values with those derived by a finite volume helicity estimation method. We find that the magnetic helicity obtained with the twist method agrees with the helicity carried by the purely current-carrying part of the field within uncertainties for most test cases. It is also found that the current-carrying part of the model field is relatively significant at the very location of the magnetic flux rope. This qualitatively explains the agreement between the magnetic helicity computed by the twist method and the helicity contributed purely by the current-carrying magnetic field.
△ Less
Submitted 7 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
Magnetic helicity estimations in models and observations of the solar magnetic field. Part I: Finite volume methods
Authors:
Gherardo Valori,
Etienne Pariat,
Sergey Anfinogentov,
Feng Chen,
Manolis K. Georgoulis,
Yang Guo,
Yang Liu,
Kostas Moraitis,
Julia K. Thalmann,
Shangbin Yang
Abstract:
Magnetic helicity is a conserved quantity of ideal magneto-hydrodynamics characterized by an inverse turbulent cascade. Accordingly, it is often invoked as one of the basic physical quantities driving the generation and structuring of magnetic fields in a variety of astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. We provide here the first systematic comparison of six existing methods for the estimation of t…
▽ More
Magnetic helicity is a conserved quantity of ideal magneto-hydrodynamics characterized by an inverse turbulent cascade. Accordingly, it is often invoked as one of the basic physical quantities driving the generation and structuring of magnetic fields in a variety of astrophysical and laboratory plasmas. We provide here the first systematic comparison of six existing methods for the estimation of the helicity of magnetic fields known in a finite volume. All such methods are reviewed, benchmarked, and compared with each other, and specifically tested for accuracy and sensitivity to errors. To that purpose, we consider four groups of numerical tests, ranging from solutions of the three-dimensional, force-free equilibrium, to magneto-hydrodynamical numerical simulations. Almost all methods are found to produce the same value of magnetic helicity within few percent in all tests. In the more solar-relevant and realistic of the tests employed here, the simulation of an eruptive flux rope, the spread in the computed values obtained by all but one method is only 3%, indicating the reliability and mutual consistency of such methods in appropriate parameter ranges. However, methods show differences in the sensitivity to numerical resolution and to errors in the solenoidal property of the input fields. In addition to finite volume methods, we also briefly discuss a method that estimates helicity from the field lines' twist, and one that exploits the field's value at one boundary and a coronal minimal connectivity instead of a pre-defined three-dimensional magnetic-field solution.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2016;
originally announced October 2016.
-
An observationally-driven kinetic approach to coronal heating
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
A. Toutountzi,
H. Isliker,
M. Georgoulis,
L. Vlahos,
G. Chintzoglou
Abstract:
Coronal heating through the explosive release of magnetic energy remains an open problem in solar physics. Recent hydrodynamical models attempt an investigation by placing swarms of 'nanoflares' at random sites and times in modeled one-dimensional coronal loops. We investigate the problem in three dimensions, using extrapolated coronal magnetic fields of observed solar active regions. We apply a n…
▽ More
Coronal heating through the explosive release of magnetic energy remains an open problem in solar physics. Recent hydrodynamical models attempt an investigation by placing swarms of 'nanoflares' at random sites and times in modeled one-dimensional coronal loops. We investigate the problem in three dimensions, using extrapolated coronal magnetic fields of observed solar active regions. We apply a nonlinear force-free field extrapolation above an observed photospheric magnetogram of NOAA active region (AR) 11158. We then determine the locations, energy contents, and volumes of 'unstable' areas, namely areas prone to releasing magnetic energy due to locally accumulated electric current density. Statistical distributions of these volumes and their fractal dimension are inferred, investigating also their dependence on spatial resolution. Further adopting a simple resistivity model, we infer the properties of the fractally distributed electric fields in these volumes. Next, we monitor the evolution of 10^5 particles (electrons and ions) obeying an initial Maxwellian distribution with a temperature of 10 eV, by following their trajectories and energization when subjected to the resulting electric fields. For computational convenience, the length element of the magnetic-field extrapolation is 1 arcsec, much coarser than the particles collisional mean free path in the low corona. The presence of collisions traps the bulk of the plasma around the unstable volumes, or current sheets (UCS), with only a tail of the distribution gaining substantial energy. Assuming that the distance between UCS is similar to the collisional mean free path we find that the low active-region corona is heated to 100-200 eV, corresponding to temperatures exceeding 2 MK, within tens of seconds for electrons and thousands of seconds for ions. Fractally distributed, nanoflare-triggening fragmented UCS ...
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2016; v1 submitted 23 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Validation of the magnetic energy vs. helicity scaling in solar magnetic structures
Authors:
K. Tziotziou,
K. Moraitis,
M. K. Georgoulis,
V. Archontis
Abstract:
We assess the validity of the free magnetic energy - relative magnetic helicity diagram for solar magnetic structures. We used two different methods of calculating the free magnetic energy and the relative magnetic helicity budgets: a classical, volume-calculation nonlinear force-free (NLFF) method applied to finite coronal magnetic structures and a surface-calculation NLFF derivation that relies…
▽ More
We assess the validity of the free magnetic energy - relative magnetic helicity diagram for solar magnetic structures. We used two different methods of calculating the free magnetic energy and the relative magnetic helicity budgets: a classical, volume-calculation nonlinear force-free (NLFF) method applied to finite coronal magnetic structures and a surface-calculation NLFF derivation that relies on a single photospheric or chromospheric vector magnetogram. Both methods were applied to two different data sets, namely synthetic active-region cases obtained by three-dimensional magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) simulations and observed active-region cases, which include both eruptive and noneruptive magnetic structures. The derived energy--helicity diagram shows a consistent monotonic scaling between relative helicity and free energy with a scaling index 0.84$\pm$0.05 for both data sets and calculation methods. It also confirms the segregation between noneruptive and eruptive active regions and the existence of thresholds in both free energy and relative helicity for active regions to enter eruptive territory. We consider the previously reported energy-helicity diagram of solar magnetic structures as adequately validated and envision a significant role of the uncovered scaling in future studies of solar magnetism.
△ Less
Submitted 29 September, 2014;
originally announced September 2014.
-
Validation and Benchmarking of a Practical Free Magnetic Energy and Relative Magnetic Helicity Budget Calculation in Solar Magnetic Structures
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
K. Tziotziou,
M. K. Georgoulis,
V. Archontis
Abstract:
In earlier works we introduced and tested a nonlinear force-free (NLFF) method designed to self-consistently calculate the free magnetic energy and the relative magnetic helicity budgets of the corona of observed solar magnetic structures. The method requires, in principle, only a single, photospheric or low-chromospheric, vector magnetogram of a quiet-Sun patch or an active region and performs ca…
▽ More
In earlier works we introduced and tested a nonlinear force-free (NLFF) method designed to self-consistently calculate the free magnetic energy and the relative magnetic helicity budgets of the corona of observed solar magnetic structures. The method requires, in principle, only a single, photospheric or low-chromospheric, vector magnetogram of a quiet-Sun patch or an active region and performs calculations in the absence of three-dimensional magnetic and velocity-field information. In this work we strictly validate this method using three-dimensional coronal magnetic fields. Benchmarking employs both synthetic, three-dimensional magnetohydrodynamic simulations and nonlinear force-free field extrapolations of the active-region solar corona. We find that our time-efficient NLFF method provides budgets that differ from those of more demanding semi-analytical methods by a factor of ~3, at most. This difference is expected from the physical concept and the construction of the method. Temporal correlations show more discrepancies that, however, are soundly improved for more complex, massive active regions, reaching correlation coefficients of the order of, or exceeding, 0.9. In conclusion, we argue that our NLFF method can be reliably used for a routine and fast calculation of free magnetic energy and relative magnetic helicity budgets in targeted parts of the solar magnetized corona. As explained here and in previous works, this is an asset that can lead to valuable insight into the physics and the triggering of solar eruptions.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
-
X-ray variability patterns in blazars
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
A. Mastichiadis
Abstract:
We study the expected variability patterns of blazars within the two-zone acceleration model putting special emphasis on flare shapes and spectral lags. We solve semi-analytically the kinetic equations which describe the particle evolution in the acceleration and radiation zone. We then perturb the solutions by introducing Lorentzian variations in its key parameters and examine the flaring behavio…
▽ More
We study the expected variability patterns of blazars within the two-zone acceleration model putting special emphasis on flare shapes and spectral lags. We solve semi-analytically the kinetic equations which describe the particle evolution in the acceleration and radiation zone. We then perturb the solutions by introducing Lorentzian variations in its key parameters and examine the flaring behavior of the system. We apply the above to the X-ray observations of blazar 1ES 1218+304 which exhibited a hard lag behavior during a flaring episode and discuss possibilities of producing it within the context of our model. The steady-state radio to X-rays emission of 1ES 1218+304 can be reproduced with parameters which lie well within the ones generally accepted from blazar modeling. Additionally, we find that the best way to explain its flaring behavior is by varying the rate of particles injected in the acceleration zone.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2010;
originally announced October 2010.
-
On the rapid TeV flaring activity of Markarian 501
Authors:
A. Mastichiadis,
K. Moraitis
Abstract:
Aims: We investigate the one-zone SSC model of TeV blazars in the presence of electron acceleration. In this picture electrons reach a maximum energy where acceleration saturates from a combination of synchrotron and inverse Compton scattering losses. Methods: We solve the spatially averaged kinetic equations which describe the simultaneous evolution of particles and photons, obtaining the multi…
▽ More
Aims: We investigate the one-zone SSC model of TeV blazars in the presence of electron acceleration. In this picture electrons reach a maximum energy where acceleration saturates from a combination of synchrotron and inverse Compton scattering losses. Methods: We solve the spatially averaged kinetic equations which describe the simultaneous evolution of particles and photons, obtaining the multi-wavelength spectrum as a function of time. Results: We apply the model to the rapid flare of Mrk 501 of July 9, 2005 as this was observed by the MAGIC telescope and obtain the relevant parameters for the pre-flare quasi steady state and the ones during the flare. We show that a hard lag flare can be obtained with parameters which lie well within the range already accepted for this source. Especially the choice of a high value of the Doppler factor seems to be necessary.
△ Less
Submitted 14 October, 2008;
originally announced October 2008.
-
A two-zone model for the emission from RX J1713.7-3946
Authors:
K. Moraitis,
A. Mastichiadis
Abstract:
We study the acceleration and radiation of charged particles in the shock waves of supernova remnants using a recent version of the "box model". According to this, particles are accelerated in an energy-dependent region around the shock by the first order Fermi mechanism and lose energy through radiation. The particle distribution function is obtained from a spatially averaged kinetic equation t…
▽ More
We study the acceleration and radiation of charged particles in the shock waves of supernova remnants using a recent version of the "box model". According to this, particles are accelerated in an energy-dependent region around the shock by the first order Fermi mechanism and lose energy through radiation. The particle distribution function is obtained from a spatially averaged kinetic equation that treats the energy losses self-consistently. There exists also a second population that consists of those particles that escape behind the shock where they also radiate. The energy distribution of this population is calculated in a similar manner. The application of the model to the supernova remnant RX J1713.7-3946, which was recently confirmed as a TeV source by H.E.S.S., shows that the X-ray emission can be attributed to electron synchrotron radiation while in gamma-rays there are contributions from both electrons and protons, with protons playing the dominant role. Additionally, there are strong indications that particles diffuse in turbulence that has a Kolmogorov spectrum.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2006;
originally announced October 2006.
