Investigating Mercury's Environment with the Two-Spacecraft BepiColombo Mission
Authors:
A. Milillo,
M. Fujimoto,
G. Murakami,
J. Benkhoff,
J. Zender,
S. Aizawa,
M. Dósa,
L. Griton,
D. Heyner,
G. Ho,
S. M. Imber,
X. Jia,
T. Karlsson,
R. M. Killen,
M. Laurenza,
S. T. Lindsay,
S. McKenna-Lawlor,
A. Mura,
J. M. Raines,
D. A. Rothery,
N. André,
W. Baumjohann,
A. Berezhnoy,
P. -A. Bourdin,
E. J. Bunce
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The ESA-JAXA BepiColombo mission will provide simultaneous measurements from two spacecraft, offering an unprecedented opportunity to investigate magnetospheric and exospheric dynamics at Mercury as well as their interactions with the solar wind, radiation, and interplanetary dust. Many scientific instruments onboard the two spacecraft will be completely, or partially devoted to study the near-spa…
▽ More
The ESA-JAXA BepiColombo mission will provide simultaneous measurements from two spacecraft, offering an unprecedented opportunity to investigate magnetospheric and exospheric dynamics at Mercury as well as their interactions with the solar wind, radiation, and interplanetary dust. Many scientific instruments onboard the two spacecraft will be completely, or partially devoted to study the near-space environment of Mercury as well as the complex processes that govern it. Many issues remain unsolved even after the MESSENGER mission that ended in 2015. The specific orbits of the two spacecraft, MPO and Mio, and the comprehensive scientific payload allow a wider range of scientific questions to be addressed than those that could be achieved by the individual instruments acting alone, or by previous missions. These joint observations are of key importance because many phenomena in Mercury's environment are highly temporally and spatially variable. Examples of possible coordinated observations are described in this article, analysing the required geometrical conditions, pointing, resolutions and operation timing of different BepiColombo instruments sensors.
△ Less
Submitted 26 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
Decay of COSAC and Ptolemy Mass Spectra at Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko
Authors:
Harald Krüger,
Fred Goesmann,
Chaitanya Giri,
Ian Wright,
Andrew Morse,
Jan Hendrik Bredehöft,
Stephan Ulamec,
Barbara Cozzoni,
Pascale Ehrenfreund,
Thomas Gautier,
Susan McKenna-Lawlor,
Francois Raulin,
Harald Steininger,
Cyril Szopa
Abstract:
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material through seven measur…
▽ More
The Rosetta lander Philae successfully landed on the nucleus of comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko on 12 November 2014. Philae is equipped with two gas analyzers: The Cometary Sampling and Composition experiment (COSAC) and the gas chromatograph and mass spectrometer Ptolemy. On 12 to 14 November 2014 both instruments measured the organic composition of the comet nucleus material through seven measurements in sniffing mode during Philae's hopping and at its final landing site Abydos. We compare the temporal evolution of intensities of several ion species identified by both mass spectrometers. For COSAC this is the first analysis of the temporal behaviour of the measured ion species. All ion species showed the highest intensities in the first spectra measured by both instruments about 20 to 30 minutes after Philae's first touchdown at Agilkia, and a decay during the six consecutive measurements at Abydos. Both instruments measured a nearly identical decay of the water peak (m/z 18), and also CO (m/z 28) behaved similarly. In the COSAC measurements the peak at m/z 44 decays much slower than all the other ion species, including the water peak. In particular, the m/z 44 peak decays much slower in the COSAC measurements than in the Ptolemy data. This supports our earlier interpretation that COSAC for the first time analyzed a regolith sample from a cometary nucleus in situ, while Ptolemy measured cometary gas from the ambient coma. The m/z 44 peak measured by COSAC was likely dominated by organic species, whereas the peak measured by Ptolemy was interpreted to be mostly due to $CO_2$. Ion species heavier than m/z 30 tend to decay somewhat slower in the COSAC measurements than in the Ptolemy data, which may be related to differences in the exhaust designs between both instruments.
△ Less
Submitted 1 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
