Exploring the Complex Ionization Environment of the Turbulent DM Tau Disk
Authors:
Deryl E. Long,
L. Ilsedore Cleeves,
Fred C. Adams,
Sean Andrews,
Edwin A. Bergin,
Viviana V. Guzmán,
Jane Huang,
A. Meredith Hughes,
Chunhua Qi,
Kamber Schwarz,
Jacob B. Simon,
David Wilner
Abstract:
Ionization drives important chemical and dynamical processes within protoplanetary disks, including the formation of organics and water in the cold midplane and the transportation of material via accretion and magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows. Understanding these ionization-driven processes is crucial for understanding disk evolution and planet formation. We use new and archival ALMA observations…
▽ More
Ionization drives important chemical and dynamical processes within protoplanetary disks, including the formation of organics and water in the cold midplane and the transportation of material via accretion and magneto-hydrodynamic (MHD) flows. Understanding these ionization-driven processes is crucial for understanding disk evolution and planet formation. We use new and archival ALMA observations of HCO+, H13CO+, and N2H+ to produce the first forward-modeled 2D ionization constraints for the DM Tau protoplanetary disk. We include ionization from multiple sources and explore the disk chemistry under a range of ionizing conditions. Abundances from our 2D chemical models are post-processed using non-LTE radiative transfer, visibility sampling, and imaging, and are compared directly to the observed radial emission profiles. The observations are best fit by a modestly reduced CR ionization rate ($ζ_{CR}$ ~ 10$^{-18}$ s$^{-1}$) and a hard X-ray spectrum (hardness ratio [HR] = 0.3), which we associate with stellar flaring conditions. Our best-fit model under-produces emission in the inner disk, suggesting that there may be an additional mechanism enhancing ionization in DM Tau's inner disk. Overall, our findings highlight the complexity of ionization in protoplanetary disks and the need for high resolution multi-line studies.
△ Less
Submitted 26 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
Substructures in Compact Disks of the Taurus Star-forming Region
Authors:
Shangjia Zhang,
Matt Kalscheur,
Feng Long,
Ke Zhang,
Deryl E. Long,
Edwin A. Bergin,
Zhaohuan Zhu,
Leon Trapman
Abstract:
Observations of substructure in protoplanetary disks have largely been limited to the brightest and largest disks, excluding the abundant population of compact disks which are likely sites of planet formation. Here, we reanalyze ~0.1'', 1.33 mm ALMA continuum observations of 12 compact protoplanetary disks in the Taurus star-forming region. By fitting visibilities directly, we identify substructur…
▽ More
Observations of substructure in protoplanetary disks have largely been limited to the brightest and largest disks, excluding the abundant population of compact disks which are likely sites of planet formation. Here, we reanalyze ~0.1'', 1.33 mm ALMA continuum observations of 12 compact protoplanetary disks in the Taurus star-forming region. By fitting visibilities directly, we identify substructures in 6 of the 12 compact disks. We then compare the substructures identified in the full Taurus sample of 24 disks in single star systems and the ALMA DSHARP survey, differentiating between compact (R_eff,90% < 50 au) and extended (R_eff,90% > 50 au) disk sources. We find that substructures are detected at nearly all radii in both small and large disks. Tentatively, we find fewer wide gaps in intermediate-sized disks with R_eff,90% between 30 and 90 au. We perform a series of planet-disk interaction simulations to constrain the sensitivity of our visibility-fitting approach. Under an assumption of planet-disk interaction, we use the gap widths and common disk parameters to calculate potential planet masses within the Taurus sample. We find that the young planet occurrence rate peaks near Neptune masses, similar to the DSHARP sample. For 0.01 $M_J/M_\odot$ $\lesssim$ $M_p/M_*$ $\lesssim$ 0.1 $M_J/M_\odot$, the rate is 17.4$\pm$8.3%; for 0.1 $M_J/M_\odot$ $\lesssim$ $M_p/M_*$ $\lesssim$ 1 $M_J/M_\odot$, it is 27.8$\pm$8.3%. Both of them are consistent with microlensing surveys. For gas giants more massive than 5 $M_J$, the occurrence rate is 4.2$\pm$4.2%, consistent with direct imaging surveys.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2023; v1 submitted 5 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
