-
A multi-wavelength analysis of a collection of short-duration GRBs observed between 2012-2015
Authors:
S. B. Pandey,
Y. Hu,
A. J. Castro-Tirado,
A. S. Pozanenko,
R. Sánchez-Ramírez,
J. Gorosabel,
5 S. Guziy,
M. Jelinek,
J. C. Tello,
S. Jeong,
S. R. Oates,
B. -B. Zhang,
E. D. Mazaeva,
A. A. Volnova,
P. Yu. Minaev,
H. J. van Eerten,
M. D. Caballero-García,
D. Pérez-Ramírez,
M. Bremer,
J. -M. Winters,
I. H. Park,
A. Nicuesa Guelbenzu,
S. Klose,
A. Moskvitin,
V. V. Sokolov
, et al. (49 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the prompt emission and the afterglow properties of short duration gamma-ray burst (sGRB) 130603B and another eight sGRB events during 2012-2015, observed by several multi-wavelength facilities including the GTC 10.4m telescope. Prompt emission high energy data of the events were obtained by INTEGRAL/SPI/ACS, Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM satellites. The prompt emission data by INTEGRAL i…
▽ More
We investigate the prompt emission and the afterglow properties of short duration gamma-ray burst (sGRB) 130603B and another eight sGRB events during 2012-2015, observed by several multi-wavelength facilities including the GTC 10.4m telescope. Prompt emission high energy data of the events were obtained by INTEGRAL/SPI/ACS, Swift/BAT and Fermi/GBM satellites. The prompt emission data by INTEGRAL in the energy range of 0.1-10 MeV for sGRB 130603B, sGRB 140606A, sGRB 140930B, sGRB 141212A and sGRB 151228A do not show any signature of the extended emission or precursor activity and their spectral and temporal properties are similar to those seen in case of other short bursts. For sGRB130603B, our new afterglow photometric data constraints the pre jet-break temporal decay due to denser temporal coverage. For sGRB 130603B, the afterglow light curve, containing both our new as well as previously published photometric data is broadly consistent with the ISM afterglow model. Modeling of the host galaxies of sGRB 130603B and sGRB 141212A using the LePHARE software supports a scenario in which the environment of the burst is undergoing moderate star formation activity. From the inclusion of our late-time data for 8 other sGRBs we are able to; place tight constraints on the non-detection of the afterglow, host galaxy or any underlying kilonova emission. Our late-time afterglow observations of the sGRB 170817A/GW170817 are also discussed and compared with the sub-set of sGRBs.
△ Less
Submitted 21 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Photometric Observations of Supernova 2013cq Associated with GRB 130427A
Authors:
R. L. Becerra,
A. M. Watson,
W. H. Lee,
N. Fraija,
N. R. Butler,
J. S. Bloom,
J. I. Capone,
A. Cucchiara,
J. A. de Diego,
O. D. Fox,
N. Gehrels,
L. N. Georgiev,
J. J. González,
A. S. Kutyrev,
O. M. Littlejohns,
J. X. Prochaska,
E. Ramirez-Ruiz,
M. G. Richer,
C. G. Román-Zúñiga,
V. L. Toy,
E. Troja
Abstract:
We observed the afterglow of GRB 130427A with the RATIR instrument on the 1.5-m Harold L. Johnson telescope of the Observatorio Astronómico Nacional on Sierra San Pedro Mártir. Our homogenous $griZYJH$ photometry extends from the night of burst to three years later. We fit a model for the afterglow. There is a significant positive residual which matches the behavior of SN 1998bw in the $griZ$ filt…
▽ More
We observed the afterglow of GRB 130427A with the RATIR instrument on the 1.5-m Harold L. Johnson telescope of the Observatorio Astronómico Nacional on Sierra San Pedro Mártir. Our homogenous $griZYJH$ photometry extends from the night of burst to three years later. We fit a model for the afterglow. There is a significant positive residual which matches the behavior of SN 1998bw in the $griZ$ filters; we suggest that this is a photometric signature of the supernova SN 2013cq associated with the GRB. The peak absolute magnitude of the supernova is $M_r=-18.43\pm0.11$.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
ALMA and RATIR observations of GRB131030A
Authors:
Kuiyun Huang,
Yuji Urata,
Satoko Takahashi,
Myungshin Im,
Po-Chieh Yu,
Changes Choi,
Nathaniel Butler,
Alan M. Watson,
Alexander Kutyrev,
William H. Lee,
Chris Klein,
Ori D. Fox,
Owen Littlejohns,
Nino Cucchiara,
Eleonora Troja,
Jesús González,
Michael G. Richer,
Carlos Román-Zúñiga,
Josh Bloom,
J. Xavier Prochaska,
Neil Gehrels,
Harvey Moseley,
Leonid Georgiev,
José A. de Diego,
Enrico Ramirez Ruiz
Abstract:
We report on the first open-use based Atacama Large Millimeter/submm Array (ALMA) 345-GHz observation for the late afterglow phase of GRB131030A. The ALMA observation constrained a deep limit at 17.1 d for the afterglow and host galaxy. We also identified a faint submillimeter source (ALMAJ2300-0522) near the GRB131030A position. The deep limit at 345 GHz and multifrequency observations obtained u…
▽ More
We report on the first open-use based Atacama Large Millimeter/submm Array (ALMA) 345-GHz observation for the late afterglow phase of GRB131030A. The ALMA observation constrained a deep limit at 17.1 d for the afterglow and host galaxy. We also identified a faint submillimeter source (ALMAJ2300-0522) near the GRB131030A position. The deep limit at 345 GHz and multifrequency observations obtained using {\it Swift} and RATIR yielded forward shock modeling with a two-dimensional relativistic hydrodynamic jet simulation and described X-ray excess in the afterglow. The excess was inconsistent with the synchrotron self-inverse Compton radiation from the forward shock. The host galaxy of GRB131030A and optical counterpart of ALMAJ2300-0522 were also identified in the SUBARU image. Based on the deep ALMA limit for the host galaxy, the 3-$σ$ upper limits of IR luminosity and the star formation rate (SFR) is estimated as $L_{IR}<1.11\times10^{11} L_{\odot}$ and SFR$<18.7$ ($M_{\odot}$~yr$^{-1}$), respectively. Although the separation angle from the burst location (3.5 arcsec) was rather large, ALMAJ2300-0522 may be one component of the GRB131030A host galaxy, according to previous host galaxy cases.
△ Less
Submitted 19 December, 2016;
originally announced December 2016.
-
Happy Birthday Swift: Ultra-long GRB141121A and its broad-band Afterglow
Authors:
A. Cucchiara,
P. Veres,
A. Corsi,
S. B. Cenko,
D. A. Perley,
A. Lien F. E. Marshall,
C. Pagani,
V. L. Toy,
J. I. Capone,
D. A. Frail,
A. Horesh,
M. Modjaz,
N. R. Butler,
O. M. Littlejohns,
A. M. Watson,
A. S. Kutyrev,
W. H. Lee,
M. G. Richer,
C. R. Klein,
O. D. Fox,
J. X. Prochaska,
J. S. Bloom,
E. Troja,
E. Ramirez-Ruiz,
J. A. de Diego
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present our extensive observational campaign on the Swift-discovered GRB141121A, al- most ten years after its launch. Our observations covers radio through X-rays, and extends for more than 30 days after discovery. The prompt phase of GRB 141121A lasted 1410 s and, at the derived redshift of z = 1.469, the isotropic energy is Eγ,iso = 8.0x10^52 erg. Due to the long prompt duration, GRB141121A f…
▽ More
We present our extensive observational campaign on the Swift-discovered GRB141121A, al- most ten years after its launch. Our observations covers radio through X-rays, and extends for more than 30 days after discovery. The prompt phase of GRB 141121A lasted 1410 s and, at the derived redshift of z = 1.469, the isotropic energy is Eγ,iso = 8.0x10^52 erg. Due to the long prompt duration, GRB141121A falls into the recently discovered class of UL-GRBs. Peculiar features of this burst are a flat early-time optical light curve and a radio-to-X-ray rebrightening around 3 days after the burst. The latter is followed by a steep optical-to-X-ray decay and a much shallower radio fading. We analyze GRB 141121A in the context of the standard forward-reverse shock (FS,RS) scenario and we disentangle the FS and RS contributions. Finally, we comment on the puzzling early-time (t ~3 d) behavior of GRB 141121A, and suggest that its interpretation may require a two-component jet model. Overall, our analysis confirms that the class of UL-GRBs represents our best opportunity to firmly establish the prominent emission mechanisms in action during powerful GRB explosions, and future missions (like SVOM, XTiDE, or ISS-Lobster) will provide many more of such objects.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
The central engine of GRB 130831A and the energy breakdown of a relativistic explosion
Authors:
M. De Pasquale,
S. R. Oates,
J. L. Racusin,
D. A. Kann,
B. Zhang,
A. Pozanenko,
A. A. Volnova,
A. Trotter,
N. Frank,
A. Cucchiara,
E. Troja,
B. Sbarufatti,
N. R. Butler,
S. Schulze,
Z. Cano,
M. J. Page,
A. J. Castro-Tirado,
J. Gorosabel,
A. Lien,
O. Fox,
O. Littlejohns,
J. S. Bloom,
J. X. Prochaska,
J. A. de Diego,
J. Gonzalez
, et al. (15 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most luminous explosions in the universe, yet the nature and physical properties of their energy sources are far from understood. Very important clues, however, can be inferred by studying the afterglows of these events. We present optical and X-ray observations of GRB 130831A obtained by Swift, Chandra, Skynet, RATIR, Maidanak, ISON, NOT, LT and GTC. This burst sho…
▽ More
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most luminous explosions in the universe, yet the nature and physical properties of their energy sources are far from understood. Very important clues, however, can be inferred by studying the afterglows of these events. We present optical and X-ray observations of GRB 130831A obtained by Swift, Chandra, Skynet, RATIR, Maidanak, ISON, NOT, LT and GTC. This burst shows a steep drop in the X-ray light-curve at $\simeq 10^5$ s after the trigger, with a power-law decay index of $α\sim 6$. Such a rare behaviour cannot be explained by the standard forward shock (FS) model and indicates that the emission, up to the fast decay at $10^5$ s, must be of "internal origin", produced by a dissipation process within an ultrarelativistic outflow. We propose that the source of such an outflow, which must produce the X-ray flux for $\simeq 1$ day in the cosmological rest frame, is a newly born magnetar or black hole. After the drop, the faint X-ray afterglow continues with a much shallower decay. The optical emission, on the other hand, shows no break across the X-ray steep decrease, and the late-time decays of both the X-ray and optical are consistent. Using both the X-ray and optical data, we show that the emission after $\simeq 10^5$ s can be explained well by the FS model. We model our data to derive the kinetic energy of the ejecta and thus measure the efficiency of the central engine of a GRB with emission of internal origin visible for a long time. Furthermore, we break down the energy budget of this GRB into the prompt emission, the late internal dissipation, the kinetic energy of the relativistic ejecta, and compare it with the energy of the associated supernova, SN 2013fu.
△ Less
Submitted 30 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
-
The Energy-Dependence of GRB Minimum Variability Timescales
Authors:
V. Zach Golkhou,
Nathaniel R. Butler,
Owen M. Littlejohns
Abstract:
We constrain the minimum variability timescales for 938 GRBs observed by the Fermi/GBM instrument prior to July 11, 2012. The tightest constraints on progenitor radii derived from these timescales are obtained from light curves in the hardest energy channel. In the softer bands -- or from measurements of the same GRBs in the hard X-rays from Swift -- we show that variability timescales tend to be…
▽ More
We constrain the minimum variability timescales for 938 GRBs observed by the Fermi/GBM instrument prior to July 11, 2012. The tightest constraints on progenitor radii derived from these timescales are obtained from light curves in the hardest energy channel. In the softer bands -- or from measurements of the same GRBs in the hard X-rays from Swift -- we show that variability timescales tend to be a factor 2--3 longer. Applying a survival analysis to account for detections and upper limits, we find median minimum timescale in the rest frame for long-duration and short-duration GRBs of 45 ms and 10 ms, respectively. Fewer than 10% of GRBs show evidence for variability on timescales below 2 ms. These shortest timescales require Lorentz factors $\gtrsim 400$ and imply typical emission radii $R \approx 1 {\times} 10^{14}$ cm for long-duration GRBs and $R \approx 3 {\times} 10^{13}$ cm for short-duration GRBs. We discuss implications for the GRB fireball model and investigate whether GRB minimum timescales evolve with cosmic time.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2015; v1 submitted 23 January, 2015;
originally announced January 2015.
-
A detailed study of the optical attenuation of gamma-ray bursts in the Swift era
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
N. R. Butler,
A. Cucchiara,
A. M. Watson,
O. D. Fox,
W. H. Lee,
A. S. Kutyrev,
M. G. Richer,
C. R. Klein,
J. X. Prochaska,
J. S. Bloom,
E. Troja,
E. Ramirez-Ruiz,
J. A. de Diego,
L. Georgiev,
J. González,
C. G. Román-Zúñiga,
N. Gehrels,
H. Moseley
Abstract:
We present optical and near-infrared (NIR) photometry of 28 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the \textit{Swift} satellite and rapidly observed by the Reionization and Transients Infrared/Optical (RATIR) camera. We compare the optical flux at fiducial times of 5.5 and 11 hours after the high-energy trigger to that in the X-ray regime to quantify optical darkness. 46$\pm$9 per cent (13/28) of all…
▽ More
We present optical and near-infrared (NIR) photometry of 28 gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) detected by the \textit{Swift} satellite and rapidly observed by the Reionization and Transients Infrared/Optical (RATIR) camera. We compare the optical flux at fiducial times of 5.5 and 11 hours after the high-energy trigger to that in the X-ray regime to quantify optical darkness. 46$\pm$9 per cent (13/28) of all bursts in our sample and 55$\pm$10 per cent (13/26) of long GRBs are optically dark, which is statistically consistently with previous studies. Fitting RATIR optical and NIR spectral energy distributions (SEDs) of 19 GRBs, most (6/7) optically dark GRBs either occur at high-redshift ($z>4.5$) or have a high dust content in their host galaxies ($A_{\rm V} > 0.3$). Performing K-S tests, we compare the RATIR sample to those previously presented in the literature, finding our distributions of redshift, optical darkness, host dust extinction and X-ray derived column density to be consistent. The one reported discrepancy is with host galaxy dust content in the BAT6 sample, which appears inconsistent with our sample and other previous literature. Comparing X-ray derived host galaxy hydrogen column densities to host galaxy dust extinction, we find that GRBs tend to occur in host galaxies with a higher metal-to-dust ratio than our own Galaxy, more akin to the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds. Finally, to mitigate time evolution of optical darkness, we measure $β_{\rm OX,rest}$ at a fixed rest frame time, $t_{\rm rest}=1.5$ hours and fixed rest frame energies in the X-ray and optical regimes. Choosing to evaluate optical flux at $λ_{\rm rest}=0.25~μ$m, we remove high-redshift as a source of optical darkness, demonstrating that optical darkness must result from either high-redshift, dust content in the host galaxy along the GRB sight line, or a combination of the two.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2015; v1 submitted 19 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
Investigating signatures of cosmological time dilation in duration measures of prompt gamma-ray burst light curves
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
N. R. Butler
Abstract:
We study the evolution with redshift of three measures of gamma-ray burst (GRB) duration ($T_{\rm 90}$, $T_{\rm 50}$ and $T_{\rm R45}$) in a fixed rest frame energy band for a sample of 232 Swift/BAT detected GRBs. Binning the data in redshift we demonstrate a trend of increasing duration with increasing redshift that can be modelled with a power-law for all three measures. Comparing redshift defi…
▽ More
We study the evolution with redshift of three measures of gamma-ray burst (GRB) duration ($T_{\rm 90}$, $T_{\rm 50}$ and $T_{\rm R45}$) in a fixed rest frame energy band for a sample of 232 Swift/BAT detected GRBs. Binning the data in redshift we demonstrate a trend of increasing duration with increasing redshift that can be modelled with a power-law for all three measures. Comparing redshift defined subsets of rest-frame duration reveals that the observed distributions of these durations are broadly consistent with cosmological time dilation. To ascertain if this is an instrumental effect, a similar analysis of Fermi/GBM data for the 57 bursts detected by both instruments is conducted, but inconclusive due to small number statistics. We then investigate under-populated regions of the duration redshift parameter space. We propose that the lack of low-redshift, long duration GRBs is a physical effect due to the sample being volume limited at such redshifts. However, we also find that the high-redshift, short duration region of parameter space suffers from censorship as any Swift GRB sample is fundamentally defined by trigger criteria determined in the observer frame energy band of Swift/BAT. As a result, we find that the significance of any evidence for cosmological time dilation in our sample of duration measures typically reduces to $<2σ$.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
-
Identifying high-redshift GRBs with RATIR
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
N. R. Butler,
A. Cucchiara,
A. M. Watson,
A. S. Kutyrev,
W. H. Lee,
M. G. Richer,
C. R. Klein,
O. D. Fox,
J. X. Prochaska,
J. S. Bloom,
E. Troja,
E. Ramirez-Ruiz,
J. A. de Diego,
L. Georgiev,
J. González,
C. G. Román-Zúñiga,
N. Gehrels,
H. Moseley
Abstract:
We present a template fitting algorithm for determining photometric redshifts, $z_{\rm phot}$, of candidate high-redshift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Using afterglow photometry, obtained by the Reionization And Transients InfraRed (RATIR) camera, this algorithm accounts for the intrinsic GRB afterglow spectral energy distribution (SED), host dust extinction and the effect of neutral hydrogen (local a…
▽ More
We present a template fitting algorithm for determining photometric redshifts, $z_{\rm phot}$, of candidate high-redshift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Using afterglow photometry, obtained by the Reionization And Transients InfraRed (RATIR) camera, this algorithm accounts for the intrinsic GRB afterglow spectral energy distribution (SED), host dust extinction and the effect of neutral hydrogen (local and cosmological) along the line of sight. We present the results obtained by this algorithm and RATIR photometry of GRB 130606A, finding a range of best fit solutions $5.6 < z_{\rm phot} < 6.0$ for models of several host dust extinction laws (none, MW, LMC and SMC), consistent with spectroscopic measurements of the redshift of this GRB. Using simulated RATIR photometry, we find our algorithm provides precise measures of $z_{\rm phot}$ in the ranges $4 < z_{\rm phot} \lesssim 8$ and $9 < z_{\rm phot} < 10$ and can robustly determine when $z_{\rm phot}>4$. Further testing highlights the required caution in cases of highly dust extincted host galaxies. These tests also show that our algorithm does not erroneously find $z_{\rm phot} < 4$ when $z_{\rm sim}>4$, thereby minimizing false negatives and allowing us to rapidly identify all potential high-redshift events.
△ Less
Submitted 21 April, 2014; v1 submitted 13 December, 2013;
originally announced December 2013.
-
Are gamma-ray bursts the same at high redshift and low redshift?
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
N. R. Tanvir,
R. Willingale,
P. A. Evans,
P. T. O'Brien,
A. J. Levan
Abstract:
The majority of Swift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed at z > 6 have prompt durations of T90 < 30s, which, at first sight, is surprising given that cosmological time-dilation means this corresponds to < 5s in their rest frames. We have tested whether these high-redshift GRBs are consistent with being drawn from the same population as those observed at low-redshift by comparing them to an artificia…
▽ More
The majority of Swift gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed at z > 6 have prompt durations of T90 < 30s, which, at first sight, is surprising given that cosmological time-dilation means this corresponds to < 5s in their rest frames. We have tested whether these high-redshift GRBs are consistent with being drawn from the same population as those observed at low-redshift by comparing them to an artificially red-shifted sample of 114 z < 4 bursts. This is accomplished using two methods to produce realistic high-z simulations of light curves based on the observed characteristics of the low-z sample. In Method 1 we use the Swift/BAT data directly, taking the photons detected in the harder bands to predict what would be seen in the softest energy band if the burst were seen at higher-z. In Method 2 we fit the light curves with a model, and use that to extrapolate the expected behaviour over the whole BAT energy range at any redshift. Based on the results of Method 2, a K-S test of their durations finds a ~1% probability that the high-z GRB sample is drawn from the same population as the bright low-z sample. Although apparently marginally significant, we must bear in mind that this test was partially a posteriori, since the rest-frame short durations of several high-z bursts motivated the study in the first instance.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2013; v1 submitted 26 September, 2013;
originally announced September 2013.
-
Are GRBs the same at high and low redshift?
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
N. R. Tanvir,
R. Willingale,
P. T. O'Brien,
P. A. Evans,
A. J. Levan
Abstract:
Due to their highly luminous nature, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are useful tools in studying the early Universe (up to z = 10). We consider whether the available subset of Swift high redshift GRBs are unusual when compared to analogous simulations of a bright low redshift sample. By simulating data from the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; Barthelmy et al. 2005) the light curves of these bright bursts are…
▽ More
Due to their highly luminous nature, gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are useful tools in studying the early Universe (up to z = 10). We consider whether the available subset of Swift high redshift GRBs are unusual when compared to analogous simulations of a bright low redshift sample. By simulating data from the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT; Barthelmy et al. 2005) the light curves of these bright bursts are obtained over an extensive range of redshifts, revealing complicated evolution in properties of the prompt emission such as T90.
△ Less
Submitted 26 August, 2013;
originally announced August 2013.
-
The origin of the early time optical emission of Swift GRB 080310
Authors:
O. M. Littlejohns,
R. Willingale,
P. T. O'Brien,
A. P. Beardmore,
S. Covino,
D. A. Perley,
N. R. Tanvir,
E. Rol,
F. Yuan,
C. Akerlof,
P. D. Avanzo,
D. F. Bersier,
A. J. Castro-Tirado,
P. Christian,
B. E. Cobb,
P. A. Evans,
A. V. Filippenko,
H. Flewelling,
D. Fugazza,
E. A. Hoversten,
A. P. Kamble,
S. Kobayashi,
W. Li,
A. N. Morgan,
C. G. Mundell
, et al. (6 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present broadband multi-wavelength observations of GRB 080310 at redshift z = 2.43. This burst was bright and long-lived, and unusual in having extensive optical and near IR follow-up during the prompt phase. Using these data we attempt to simultaneously model the gamma-ray, X-ray, optical and IR emission using a series of prompt pulses and an afterglow component. Initial attempts to extrapolat…
▽ More
We present broadband multi-wavelength observations of GRB 080310 at redshift z = 2.43. This burst was bright and long-lived, and unusual in having extensive optical and near IR follow-up during the prompt phase. Using these data we attempt to simultaneously model the gamma-ray, X-ray, optical and IR emission using a series of prompt pulses and an afterglow component. Initial attempts to extrapolate the high energy model directly to lower energies for each pulse reveal that a spectral break is required between the optical regime and 0.3 keV to avoid over predicting the optical flux. We demonstrate that afterglow emission alone is insufficient to describe all morphology seen in the optical and IR data. Allowing the prompt component to dominate the early-time optical and IR and permitting each pulse to have an independent low energy spectral indices we produce an alternative scenario which better describes the optical light curve. This, however, does not describe the spectral shape of GRB 080310 at early times. The fit statistics for the prompt and afterglow dominated models are nearly identical making it difficult to favour either. However one enduring result is that both models require a low energy spectral index consistent with self absorption for at least some of the pulses identified in the high energy emission model.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2012;
originally announced January 2012.
