Asteroids in the High cadence Transient Survey
Authors:
J. Peña,
C. Fuentes,
F. Förster,
J. C. Maureira,
J. San Martín,
J. Littín,
P. Huijse,
G. Cabrera-Vives,
P. A. Estévez,
L. Galbany,
S. González-Gaitán,
J. Martínez,
Th. de Jaeger,
M. Hamuy
Abstract:
We report on the serendipitous observations of Solar System objects imaged during the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) 2014 observation campaign. Data from this high cadence, wide field survey was originally analyzed for finding variable static sources using Machine Learning to select the most-likely candidates. In this work we search for moving transients consistent with Solar System objects…
▽ More
We report on the serendipitous observations of Solar System objects imaged during the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) 2014 observation campaign. Data from this high cadence, wide field survey was originally analyzed for finding variable static sources using Machine Learning to select the most-likely candidates. In this work we search for moving transients consistent with Solar System objects and derive their orbital parameters.
We use a simple, custom detection algorithm to link trajectories and assume Keplerian motion to derive the asteroid's orbital parameters. We use known asteroids from the Minor Planet Center (MPC) database to assess the detection efficiency of the survey and our search algorithm. Trajectories have an average of nine detections spread over 2 days, and our fit yields typical errors of $σ_a\sim 0.07 ~{\rm AU}$, $σ_{\rm e} \sim 0.07 $ and $σ_i\sim 0.^{\circ}5~ {\rm deg}$ in semi-major axis, eccentricity, and inclination respectively for known asteroids in our sample. We extract 7,700 orbits from our trajectories, identifying 19 near Earth objects, 6,687 asteroids, 14 Centaurs, and 15 trans-Neptunian objects. This highlights the complementarity of supernova wide field surveys for Solar System research and the significance of machine learning to clean data of false detections. It is a good example of the data--driven science that LSST will deliver.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
The High Cadence Transient Survey (HiTS) - I. Survey design and supernova shock breakout constraints
Authors:
Francisco Förster,
Juan C. Maureira,
Jaime San Martín,
Mario Hamuy,
Jorge Martínez,
Pablo Huijse,
Guillermo Cabrera,
Lluís Galbany,
Thomas de Jaeger,
Santiago González-Gaitán,
Joseph P. Anderson,
Hanindyo Kuncarayakti,
Giuliano Pignata,
Filomena Bufano,
Jorge Littín,
Felipe Olivares,
Gustavo Medina,
R. Chris Smith,
A. Katherina Vivas,
Pablo A. Estévez,
Ricardo Muñoz,
Eduardo Vera
Abstract:
We present the first results of the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS), a survey whose objective is to detect and follow up optical transients with characteristic timescales from hours to days, especially the earliest hours of supernova (SN) explosions. HiTS uses the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and a custom made pipeline for image subtraction, candidate filtering and candidate visualization, whic…
▽ More
We present the first results of the High cadence Transient Survey (HiTS), a survey whose objective is to detect and follow up optical transients with characteristic timescales from hours to days, especially the earliest hours of supernova (SN) explosions. HiTS uses the Dark Energy Camera (DECam) and a custom made pipeline for image subtraction, candidate filtering and candidate visualization, which runs in real-time to be able to react rapidly to the new transients. We discuss the survey design, the technical challenges associated with the real-time analysis of these large volumes of data and our first results. In our 2013, 2014 and 2015 campaigns we have detected more than 120 young SN candidates, but we did not find a clear signature from the short-lived SN shock breakouts (SBOs) originating after the core collapse of red supergiant stars, which was the initial science aim of this survey. Using the empirical distribution of limiting-magnitudes from our observational campaigns we measured the expected recovery fraction of randomly injected SN light curves which included SBO optical peaks produced with models from Tominaga et al. (2011) and Nakar & Sari (2010). From this analysis we cannot rule out the models from Tominaga et al. (2011) under any reasonable distributions of progenitor masses, but we can marginally rule out the brighter and longer-lived SBO models from Nakar & Sari (2010) under our best-guess distribution of progenitor masses. Finally, we highlight the implications of this work for future massive datasets produced by astronomical observatories such as LSST.
△ Less
Submitted 12 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
