-
Low-frequency absorption and radio recombination line features of the Galactic Center Lobe
Authors:
Natasha Hurley-Walker,
L. D. Anderson,
M. Luisi,
N. M. McClure-Griffiths,
Robert A. Benjamin,
Michael A. Kuhn,
Dylan J. Linville,
B. Liu,
Catherine Zucker
Abstract:
The Galactic center lobe (GCL) is a $\sim 1^\circ$ object located north of the Galactic center. In the mid-infrared (MIR), the GCL appears as two 8.0-micron filaments that roughly define an ellipse. There is strong 24-micron and radio continuum emission in the interior of the ellipse. Due to its morphology and location in the sky, previous authors have argued that the GCL is created by outflows fr…
▽ More
The Galactic center lobe (GCL) is a $\sim 1^\circ$ object located north of the Galactic center. In the mid-infrared (MIR), the GCL appears as two 8.0-micron filaments that roughly define an ellipse. There is strong 24-micron and radio continuum emission in the interior of the ellipse. Due to its morphology and location in the sky, previous authors have argued that the GCL is created by outflows from star formation in the central molecular zone or by activity of the central black hole Sgr~A$^*$. We present images of the GCL from the GaLactic and Extragalactic All-sky Murchison Widefield Array survey in radio continuum that show thermal absorption against the Galactic center, incompatible with an interpretation of synchrotron self-absorption. Estimates of the cosmic ray emissivity in this direction allow us to place a distance constraint on the GCL. To be consistent with standard emissivity assumptions, the GCL would be located 2kpc away. At a distance of 8kpc, the synchrotron background emissivity is enhanced by $\sim75$% in the direction of the GCL. We also present radio recombination line data from the Green Bank Telescope that constrains the electron temperature and line widths in this region, which are also more explicable if the GCL lies relatively close.
△ Less
Submitted 19 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
The Galactic Center Lobe as an HII Region
Authors:
L. D. Anderson,
Matteo Luisi,
B. Liu,
Dylan J. Linville,
Robert A. Benjamin,
Natasha Hurley-Walker,
N. M. McClure-Griffiths,
Catherine Zucker
Abstract:
The Galactic center lobe (GCL) is an object ~1° across that is located north of the Galactic center. In the mid-infrared (MIR) the GCL appears as two 8.0$μ$m filaments between which is strong 24$μ$m and radio continuum emission. Due to its morphology and location in the sky, previous authors have argued that the GCL is located in the Galactic center region, created by outflows from star formation…
▽ More
The Galactic center lobe (GCL) is an object ~1° across that is located north of the Galactic center. In the mid-infrared (MIR) the GCL appears as two 8.0$μ$m filaments between which is strong 24$μ$m and radio continuum emission. Due to its morphology and location in the sky, previous authors have argued that the GCL is located in the Galactic center region, created by outflows from star formation or by activity of the central black hole Sagittarius A*. In an associated paper (Hurley-Walker et al., 2024, in press), low-frequency radio emission indicates that the GCL must instead lie foreground to the Galactic center. If the GCL is foreground to the Galactic center, it is likely to be a type of object common throughout the Galactic disk; we here investigate whether its properties are similar to those of Galactic HII regions. We find that the GCL's MIR morphology, MIR flux densities, dust temperatures, and radio recombination line (RRL) properties as traced by the GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) are consistent with those of known Galactic HII regions, although the derived electron temperature is low. We search for the ionizing source(s) of the possible HII region and identify a stellar cluster candidate (Camargo #1092/Ryu & Lee #532) and a cluster of young stellar objects (SPICY G359.3+0.3) whose members have Gaia parallaxes distances of 1.7${\pm}$0.4kpc. Taken together, the results of our companion paper and those shown here suggest that the GCL has properties consistent with those of an HII region located ~2kpc from the Sun.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Methods for Averaging Spectral Line Data
Authors:
L. D. Anderson,
B. Liu,
Dana S. Balser,
T. M. Bania,
L. M. Haffner,
Dylan J. Linville,
Matteo Luisi,
Trey V. Wenger
Abstract:
The ideal spectral averaging method depends on one's science goals and the available information about one's data. Including low-quality data in the average can decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which may necessitate an optimization method or a consideration of different weighting schemes. Here, we explore a variety of spectral averaging methods. We investigate the use of three weighting s…
▽ More
The ideal spectral averaging method depends on one's science goals and the available information about one's data. Including low-quality data in the average can decrease the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), which may necessitate an optimization method or a consideration of different weighting schemes. Here, we explore a variety of spectral averaging methods. We investigate the use of three weighting schemes during averaging: weighting by the signal divided by the variance ("intensity-noise weighting"), weighting by the inverse of the variance ("noise weighting"), and uniform weighting. Whereas for intensity-noise weighting the SNR is maximized when all spectra are averaged, for noise and uniform weighting we find that averaging the 35-45% of spectra with the highest SNR results in the highest SNR average spectrum. With this intensity cutoff, the average spectrum with noise or uniform weighting has ~95% of the intensity of the spectrum created from intensity-noise weighting. We apply our spectral averaging methods to GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas (GDIGS) hydrogen radio recombination line (RRL) data to determine the ionic abundance ratio, y+, and discuss future applications of the methodology.
△ Less
Submitted 17 October, 2023; v1 submitted 13 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS): Discrete Sources
Authors:
Dylan J. Linville,
Matteo Luisi,
L. D. Anderson,
Bin Liu,
T. M. Bania,
Dana S. Balser,
Trey V. Wenger,
L. M. Haffner,
J. L. Mascoop
Abstract:
The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) traces ionized gas in the Galactic midplane by observing radio recombination line (RRL) emission from 4-8 GHz. The nominal survey zone is $32.3^{\circ}> {\ell} > -5^{\circ}$, $|b|<0.5^{\circ}$. Here, we analyze GDIGS Hn$α$ ionized gas emission toward discrete sources. Using GDIGS data, we identify the velocity of 35 H II regions tha…
▽ More
The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) traces ionized gas in the Galactic midplane by observing radio recombination line (RRL) emission from 4-8 GHz. The nominal survey zone is $32.3^{\circ}> {\ell} > -5^{\circ}$, $|b|<0.5^{\circ}$. Here, we analyze GDIGS Hn$α$ ionized gas emission toward discrete sources. Using GDIGS data, we identify the velocity of 35 H II regions that have multiple detected RRL velocity components. We identify and characterize RRL emission from 88 H II regions that previously lacked measured ionized gas velocities. We also identify and characterize RRL emission from eight locations that appear to be previously-unidentified H II regions and 30 locations of RRL emission that do not appear to be H II regions based on their lack of mid-infrared emission. This latter group may be a compact component of the Galactic Diffuse Ionized Gas (DIG). There are an additional 10 discrete sources that have anomalously high RRL velocities for their locations in the Galactic plane. We compare these objects' RRL data to 13CO, H I and mid-infrared data, and find that these sources do not have the expected 24 $μ$m emission characteristic of H II regions. Based on this comparison we do not think these objects are H II regions, but we are unable to classify them as a known type of object.
△ Less
Submitted 2 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Stellar feedback and triggered star formation in the prototypical bubble RCW 120
Authors:
Matteo Luisi,
Loren D. Anderson,
Nicola Schneider,
Robert Simon,
Slawa Kabanovic,
Rolf Güsten,
Annie Zavagno,
Patrick S. Broos,
Christof Buchbender,
Cristian Guevara,
Karl Jacobs,
Matthias Justen,
Bernd Klein,
Dylan Linville,
Markus Röllig,
Delphine Russeil,
Jürgen Stutzki,
Maitraiyee Tiwari,
Leisa K. Townsley,
Alexander G. G. M. Tielens
Abstract:
Radiative and mechanical feedback of massive stars regulates star formation and galaxy evolution. Positive feedback triggers the creation of new stars by collecting dense shells of gas, while negative feedback disrupts star formation by shredding molecular clouds. Although key to understanding star formation, their relative importance is unknown. Here, we report velocity-resolved observations from…
▽ More
Radiative and mechanical feedback of massive stars regulates star formation and galaxy evolution. Positive feedback triggers the creation of new stars by collecting dense shells of gas, while negative feedback disrupts star formation by shredding molecular clouds. Although key to understanding star formation, their relative importance is unknown. Here, we report velocity-resolved observations from the SOFIA (Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy) legacy program FEEDBACK of the massive star-forming region RCW 120 in the [CII] 1.9-THz fine-structure line, revealing a gas shell expanding at 15 km/s. Complementary APEX (Atacama Pathfinder Experiment) CO J=3-2 345-GHz observations exhibit a ring structure of molecular gas, fragmented into clumps that are actively forming stars. Our observations demonstrate that triggered star formation can occur on much shorter time scales than hitherto thought (<0.15 million years), suggesting that positive feedback operates on short time periods.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
The GBT Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS): Survey Overview and First Data Release
Authors:
L. D. Anderson,
Matteo Luisi,
Bin Liu,
Trey V. Wenger,
Dana. S. Balser,
T. M. Bania,
L. M. Haffner,
Dylan J. Linville,
J. L. Mascoop
Abstract:
The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) traces ionized gas in the Galactic midplane by measuring $4-8$GHz radio recombination line (RRL) emission. The nominal survey zone is $32.3^{\circ}> l >-5^{\circ}$, $|b|<0.5^{\circ}$, but coverage extends above and below the plane in select fields, and additionally includes the areas around W47 ($l \simeq 37.5^{\circ}$) and W49 (…
▽ More
The Green Bank Telescope (GBT) Diffuse Ionized Gas Survey (GDIGS) traces ionized gas in the Galactic midplane by measuring $4-8$GHz radio recombination line (RRL) emission. The nominal survey zone is $32.3^{\circ}> l >-5^{\circ}$, $|b|<0.5^{\circ}$, but coverage extends above and below the plane in select fields, and additionally includes the areas around W47 ($l \simeq 37.5^{\circ}$) and W49 ($l \simeq 43^{\circ}$). GDIGS simultaneously observes 22 Hn$α$ (15 usable), 25 Hn$β$ (18 usable), and 8 Hn$γ$ RRLs (all usable), as well as multiple molecular line transitions (including of H$_2^{13}$CO, H$_2$CO, and CH$_3$OH). Here, we describe the GDIGS survey parameters and characterize the RRL data, focusing primarily on the Hn$α$ data. We produce sensitive data cubes by averaging the usable RRLs, after first smoothing to a common spectral resolution of 0.5km/s and a spatial resolution of 2.65' for Hn$α$, 2.62' for Hn$β$, and 2.09' for Hn$γ$. The average spectral noise per spaxel in the \hna\ data cubes is $\sim\!10$mK ($\sim\!5$mJy/beam). This sensitivity allows GDIGS to detect RRLs from plasma throughout the inner Galaxy. The GDIGS Hn$α$ data are sensitive to emission measures $EM \gtrsim 1100$cm$^{-6}$pc, which corresponds to a mean electron density $\langle n_e \rangle \gtrsim 30$cm$^{-3}$ for a 1pc path length or $\langle n_e \rangle \gtrsim 1$cm$^{-3}$ for a 1kpc path length.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2021; v1 submitted 18 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
