-
Accessing the Host Galaxies of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts with Next-Generation Telescopes
Authors:
Guang-Xuan Lan,
Ye Li,
Zhuo Li
Abstract:
We present a method to estimate the detection expectations of host galaxies of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) in the {\it grizJHKL} bands. It is found that given the same limiting magnitude $m_{grizJHKL,\rm lim}$ in each band, the {\it z} band produces the largest number of overall LGRB hosts and low-mass hosts ($M_\ast\leq10^8$ M$_\odot$) at $m_{grizJHKL,\rm lim}\gtrsim 26$ mag. For the detection…
▽ More
We present a method to estimate the detection expectations of host galaxies of long gamma-ray bursts (LGRBs) in the {\it grizJHKL} bands. It is found that given the same limiting magnitude $m_{grizJHKL,\rm lim}$ in each band, the {\it z} band produces the largest number of overall LGRB hosts and low-mass hosts ($M_\ast\leq10^8$ M$_\odot$) at $m_{grizJHKL,\rm lim}\gtrsim 26$ mag. For the detection of high-redshift LGRB hosts (redshift $\geq5$), it is recommended to prioritize the {\it L} band due to its good performance at both low and high limiting magnitudes. We specifically estimate the expectation of LGRB-host detection with $m_{grizJHKL,\rm lim}=28$ mag, which the James Webb Space Telescope can partially attain. We find that there may exist 116, 259, 277, 439, 266, 294, 274, and 316 LGRB hosts, including 0.54, 31, 28, 143, 12, 20, 14, and 35 low-mass ones in the {\it grizJHKL} bands and 13, 14, 15, 14, and 15 high-redshift ones in the {\it zJHKL} bands, for 15 yr {\it Swift} LGRBs with $S\geq10^{-6}$ erg cm$^{-2}$. The results show that the study of LGRB hosts under next-generation observational conditions holds significant potential, especially for low-mass host studies. However, it appears that deeper sensitivities of galaxy telescopes may not significantly enhance statistical studies of high-redshift hosts. Strategies aimed at increasing the number of distant LGRB hosts may require the expansion of high-redshift LGRB detection.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2024; v1 submitted 14 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
The Stellar-mass Function of Long Gamma-Ray Burst Host Galaxies
Authors:
Guang-Xuan Lan,
Jun-Jie Wei,
Ye Li,
Hou-Dun Zeng,
Xue-Feng Wu
Abstract:
Long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been discussed as a potential tool to probe the cosmic star formation rate (SFR) for a long time. Some studies found an enhancement in the GRB rate relative to the galaxy-inferred SFR at high redshifts, which indicates that GRBs may not be good tracers of star formation. However, in these studies, the GRB rate measured at any redshift is an average over all galaxi…
▽ More
Long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) have been discussed as a potential tool to probe the cosmic star formation rate (SFR) for a long time. Some studies found an enhancement in the GRB rate relative to the galaxy-inferred SFR at high redshifts, which indicates that GRBs may not be good tracers of star formation. However, in these studies, the GRB rate measured at any redshift is an average over all galaxies at that epoch. A deep understanding of the connection between GRB production and environment also needs to characterize the population of GRB host galaxies directly. Based on a complete sample of GRB hosts, we constrain the stellar-mass function (SMF) of GRB hosts, and examine redshift evolution in the GRB host population. Our results confirm that a strong redshift evolution in energy (with an evolution index of $δ=2.47^{+0.73}_{-0.89}$) or in density ($δ=1.82^{+0.22}_{-0.59}$) is needed in order to account for the observations. The GRB host SMF can be well described by the Schechter function with a power-law index $ξ\approx-1.10$ and a break mass $M_{b,0}\approx4.9\times10^{10}$ ${\rm M}_\odot$, independent of the assumed evolutionary effects. This is the first formulation of the GRB host SMF. The observed discrepancy between the GRB rate and the galaxy-inferred SFR may also be explained by an evolving SMF.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2022; v1 submitted 5 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Gravitationally Lensed Orphan Afterglows of Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
Hao-Xuan Gao,
Jin-Jun Geng,
Lei Hu,
Mao-Kai Hu,
Guang-Xuan Lan,
Chen-Ming Chang,
Song-Bo Zhang,
Xiao-Li Zhang,
Yong-Feng Huang,
Xue-Feng Wu
Abstract:
The cosmological nature of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) implies that a small portion of them could be gravitationally lensed by foreground objects during their propagation. The gravitational lensing effect on the GRB prompt emission and on-axis afterglows has been discussed, and some candidates have been found in the literature. In this work, considering the high detection rate of GRB orphan afterglows…
▽ More
The cosmological nature of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) implies that a small portion of them could be gravitationally lensed by foreground objects during their propagation. The gravitational lensing effect on the GRB prompt emission and on-axis afterglows has been discussed, and some candidates have been found in the literature. In this work, considering the high detection rate of GRB orphan afterglows in future wide-field survey era, we investigate the gravitationally lensed orphan afterglows in view of three lens models, i.e., the point-mass model, the singular isothermal sphere model, and the Chang-Refsdal model. The structure of the GRB jet itself is also incorporated in calculating the lensed afterglow light curves. It is found that lensed optical/X-ray orphan afterglows in principle could be diagnosed through their temporal characteristics, and the optical band is the best band to observe the galaxy-lensed orphan afterglows. Moreover, the event rate for galaxy-lensed orphan afterglows is estimated to be $\lesssim$ 1.8 $\text{yr}^{-1}$ for the whole sky. If most orphan afterglows could be identified (from other transients in the survey data), the optimistic detection rates of the 2.5m Wide Field Survey Telescope of China and 8.4m Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time for galaxy-lensed orphan afterglows in the optical band are $\lesssim$ 0.01$\sim$0.02 $\text{yr}^{-1}$ and $\lesssim$ 0.04$\sim$0.08 $\text{yr}^{-1}$, respectively.
△ Less
Submitted 10 August, 2022; v1 submitted 7 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Revisiting the luminosity and redshift distributions of long gamma-ray bursts
Authors:
Guang-Xuan Lan,
Jun-Jie Wei,
Hou-Dun Zeng,
Ye Li,
Xue-Feng Wu
Abstract:
In this work, we update and enlarge the long gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample detected by the {\it Swift} satellite. Given the incomplete sampling of the faint bursts and the low completeness in redshift measurement, we carefully select a subsample of bright {\it Swift} bursts to revisit the GRB luminosity function (LF) and redshift distribution by taking into account the probability of redshift measu…
▽ More
In this work, we update and enlarge the long gamma-ray burst (GRB) sample detected by the {\it Swift} satellite. Given the incomplete sampling of the faint bursts and the low completeness in redshift measurement, we carefully select a subsample of bright {\it Swift} bursts to revisit the GRB luminosity function (LF) and redshift distribution by taking into account the probability of redshift measurement. Here we also explore two general expressions for the GRB LF, i.e., a broken power-law LF and a triple power-law LF. Our results suggest that a strong redshift evolution in luminosity (with an evolution index of $δ=1.92^{+0.25}_{-0.37}$) or in density ($δ=1.26^{+0.33}_{-0.34}$) is required in order to well account for the observations, independent of the assumed expression of the GRB LF. However, in a one-on-one comparison using the Akaike information criterion, the best-fitting evolution model involving the triple power-law LF is statistically preferred over the best-fitting one involving the broken power-law LF with a relative probability of $\sim94.3$\% versus $\sim5.7$\%. Extrapolating our fitting results to the flux limit of the whole {\it Swift} sample, and considering the trigger probability of {\it Swift}/Burst Alert Telescope in detail, we find that the expectations from our evolution models provide a good representation of the observed distributions of the whole sample without the need for any adjustment of the model free parameters. This further confirms the reliability of our analysis results.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
The Luminosity Function and Formation Rate of A Complete Sample of Long Gamma-Ray Bursts
Authors:
Guang-Xuan Lan,
Hou-Dun Zeng,
Jun-Jie Wei,
Xue-Feng Wu
Abstract:
We study the luminosity function and formation rate of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by using a maximum likelihood method. This is the first time this method is applied to a well-defined sample of GRBs that is complete in redshift. The sample is composed of 99 bursts detected by the $Swift$ satellite, 81 of them with measured redshift and luminosity for a completeness level of $82\%$. We confirm th…
▽ More
We study the luminosity function and formation rate of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) by using a maximum likelihood method. This is the first time this method is applied to a well-defined sample of GRBs that is complete in redshift. The sample is composed of 99 bursts detected by the $Swift$ satellite, 81 of them with measured redshift and luminosity for a completeness level of $82\%$. We confirm that a strong redshift evolution in luminosity (with an evolution index of $δ=2.22^{+0.32}_{-0.31}$) or in density ($δ=1.92^{+0.20}_{-0.21}$) is needed in order to reproduce the observations well. But since the predicted redshift and luminosity distributions in the two scenarios are very similar, it is difficult to distinguish between these two kinds of evolutions only on the basis of the current sample. Furthermore, we also consider an empirical density case in which the GRB rate density is directly described as a broken power-law function and the luminosity function is taken to be non-evolving. In this case, we find that the GRB formation rate rises like $(1+z)^{3.85^{+0.48}_{-0.45}}$ for $z\leq2$ and is proportional to $(1+z)^{-1.07^{+0.98}_{-1.12}}$ for $z\geq2$. The local GRB rate is $1.49^{+0.63}_{-0.64}$ Gpc$^{-3}$ yr$^{-1}$. The GRB rate may be consistent with the cosmic star formation rate (SFR) at $z\leq2$, but shows an enhancement compared to the SFR at $z\geq2$.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
