Forecasting the constraints on optical selection bias and projection effects of galaxy cluster lensing with multiwavelength data
Authors:
Conghao Zhou,
Hao-Yi Wu,
Andrés N. Salcedo,
Sebastian Grandis,
Tesla Jeltema,
Alexie Leauthaud,
Matteo Costanzi,
Tomomi Sunayama,
David H. Weinberg,
Tianyu Zhang,
Eduardo Rozo,
Chun-Hao To,
Sebastian Bocquet,
Tamas Varga,
Matthew Kwiecien
Abstract:
Galaxy clusters identified with optical imaging tend to suffer from projection effects, which impact richness (the number of member galaxies in a cluster) and lensing coherently. Physically unassociated galaxies can be mistaken as cluster members due to the significant uncertainties in their line-of-sight distances, thereby changing the observed cluster richness; at the same time, projection effec…
▽ More
Galaxy clusters identified with optical imaging tend to suffer from projection effects, which impact richness (the number of member galaxies in a cluster) and lensing coherently. Physically unassociated galaxies can be mistaken as cluster members due to the significant uncertainties in their line-of-sight distances, thereby changing the observed cluster richness; at the same time, projection effects alter the weak gravitational lensing signals of clusters, leading to a correlated scatter between richness and lensing at a given halo mass. As a result, the lensing signals for optically selected clusters tend to be biased high. This optical selection bias problem of cluster lensing is one of the key challenges in cluster cosmology. Fortunately, recently available multiwavelength observations of clusters provide a solution. We analyze a simulated data set mimicking the observed lensing of clusters identified by both optical photometry and gas properties, aiming to constrain this selection bias. Assuming a redMaPPer sample from the Dark Energy Survey with South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect observations, we find that an overlapping survey of 1300 square deg, 0.2 < z < 0.65, can constrain the average lensing bias to an accuracy of 5 percent. This provides an exciting opportunity for directly constraining optical selection bias from observations. We further show that our approach can remove the optical selection bias from the lensing signal, paving the way for future optical cluster cosmology analyses.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Mis-centering calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters
Authors:
P. Kelly,
J. Jobel,
O. Eiger,
A. Abd,
T. E. Jeltema,
P. Giles,
D. L. Hollowood,
R. D. Wilkinson,
D. J. Turner,
S. Bhargava,
S. Everett,
A. Farahi,
A. K. Romer,
E. S. Rykoff,
F. Wang,
S. Bocquet,
D. Cross,
R. Faridjoo,
J. Franco,
G. Gardner,
M. Kwiecien,
D. Laubner,
A. McDaniel,
J. H. O'Donnell,
L. Sanchez
, et al. (54 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$)…
▽ More
We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$) or redshift ($0.2<z<0.4$ and $0.4 <z < 0.65$). We also investigate the richness bias induced by miscentering. The dominant reasons for miscentering include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster; for half of the miscentered clusters the correct central was one of the other possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for $\sim 40$% of miscentered clusters the correct central is not a redMaPPer member with most of these cases due to masking. In addition, we fit the scaling relations between X-ray temperature and richness and between X-ray luminosity and richness. We find a T$_X$-$λ$ scatter of $0.21 \pm 0.01$. While the scatter in T$_X$-$λ$ is consistent in bins of redshift, we do find modestly different slopes with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, $20 < λ< 40$. The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those for targeted clusters, but the depth of the X-ray data for undetected clusters is insufficient to judge whether they are X-ray underluminous in all but one case.
△ Less
Submitted 19 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
