-
Red noise versus planetary interpretations in the microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-446
Authors:
E. Bachelet,
D. M. Bramich,
C. Han,
J. Greenhill,
R. A. Street,
A. Gould,
G. D Ago,
K. AlSubai,
M. Dominik,
R. Figuera Jaimes,
K. Horne,
M. Hundertmark,
N. Kains,
C. Snodgrass,
I. A. Steele,
Y. Tsapras,
M. D. Albrow,
V. Batista,
J. -P. Beaulieu,
D. P. Bennett,
S. Brillant,
J. A. R. Caldwell,
A. Cassan,
A. Cole,
C. Coutures
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
For all exoplanet candidates, the reliability of a claimed detection needs to be assessed through a careful study of systematic errors in the data to minimize the false positives rate. We present a method to investigate such systematics in microlensing datasets using the microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0446 as a case study. The event was observed from multiple sites around the world and its high…
▽ More
For all exoplanet candidates, the reliability of a claimed detection needs to be assessed through a careful study of systematic errors in the data to minimize the false positives rate. We present a method to investigate such systematics in microlensing datasets using the microlensing event OGLE-2013-BLG-0446 as a case study. The event was observed from multiple sites around the world and its high magnification (A_{max} \sim 3000) allowed us to investigate the effects of terrestrial and annual parallax. Real-time modeling of the event while it was still ongoing suggested the presence of an extremely low-mass companion (\sim 3M_\oplus ) to the lensing star, leading to substantial follow-up coverage of the light curve. We test and compare different models for the light curve and conclude that the data do not favour the planetary interpretation when systematic errors are taken into account.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2015; v1 submitted 9 October, 2015;
originally announced October 2015.
-
MOA-2010-BLG-073L: An M-Dwarf with a Substellar Companion at the Planet/Brown Dwarf Boundary
Authors:
R. A. Street,
J. -Y. Choi,
Y. Tsapras,
C. Han,
K. Furusawa,
M. Hundertmark,
A. Gould,
T. Sumi,
I. A. Bond,
D. Wouters,
R. Zellem,
A. Udalski,
C. Snodgrass,
K. Horne,
M. Dominik,
P. Browne,
N. Kains,
D. M. Bramich,
D. Bajek,
I. A. Steele,
S. Ipatov,
F. Abe,
D. P. Bennett,
C. S. Botzler,
P. Chote
, et al. (107 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present an analysis of the anomalous microlensing event, MOA-2010-BLG-073, announced by the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics survey on 2010-03-18.
This event was remarkable because the source was previously known to be photometrically variable. Analyzing the pre-event source lightcurve, we demonstrate that it is an irregular variable over time scales >200d. Its dereddened color,…
▽ More
We present an analysis of the anomalous microlensing event, MOA-2010-BLG-073, announced by the Microlensing Observations in Astrophysics survey on 2010-03-18.
This event was remarkable because the source was previously known to be photometrically variable. Analyzing the pre-event source lightcurve, we demonstrate that it is an irregular variable over time scales >200d. Its dereddened color, $(V-I)_{S,0}$, is 1.221$\pm$0.051mag and from our lens model we derive a source radius of 14.7$\pm$1.3 $R_{\odot}$, suggesting that it is a red giant star.
We initially explored a number of purely microlensing models for the event but found a residual gradient in the data taken prior to and after the event. This is likely to be due to the variability of the source rather than part of the lensing event, so we incorporated a slope parameter in our model in order to derive the true parameters of the lensing system.
We find that the lensing system has a mass ratio of q=0.0654$\pm$0.0006. The Einstein crossing time of the event, $T_{\rm{E}}=44.3$\pm$0.1d, was sufficiently long that the lightcurve exhibited parallax effects. In addition, the source trajectory relative to the large caustic structure allowed the orbital motion of the lens system to be detected. Combining the parallax with the Einstein radius, we were able to derive the distance to the lens, $D_L$=2.8$\pm$0.4kpc, and the masses of the lensing objects. The primary of the lens is an M-dwarf with $M_{L,p}$=0.16$\pm0.03M_{\odot}$ while the companion has $M_{L,s}$=11.0$\pm2.0M_{\rm{J}}$ putting it in the boundary zone between planets and brown dwarfs.
△ Less
Submitted 11 December, 2012; v1 submitted 15 November, 2012;
originally announced November 2012.
-
MOA-2010-BLG-311: A planetary candidate below the threshold of reliable detection
Authors:
J. C. Yee,
L. -W. Hung,
I. A. Bond,
W. Allen,
L. A. G. Monard,
M. D. Albrow,
P. Fouque,
M. Dominik,
Y. Tsapras,
A. Udalski,
A. Gould,
R. Zellem,
M. Bos,
G. W. Christie,
D. L. DePoy,
Subo Dong,
J. Drummond,
B. S. Gaudi,
E. Gorbikov,
C. Han,
S. Kaspi,
N. Klein,
C. -U. Lee,
D. Maoz,
J. McCormick
, et al. (101 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We analyze MOA-2010-BLG-311, a high magnification (A_max>600) microlensing event with complete data coverage over the peak, making it very sensitive to planetary signals. We fit this event with both a point lens and a 2-body lens model and find that the 2-body lens model is a better fit but with only Delta chi^2~80. The preferred mass ratio between the lens star and its companion is $q=10^(-3.7+/-…
▽ More
We analyze MOA-2010-BLG-311, a high magnification (A_max>600) microlensing event with complete data coverage over the peak, making it very sensitive to planetary signals. We fit this event with both a point lens and a 2-body lens model and find that the 2-body lens model is a better fit but with only Delta chi^2~80. The preferred mass ratio between the lens star and its companion is $q=10^(-3.7+/-0.1), placing the candidate companion in the planetary regime. Despite the formal significance of the planet, we show that because of systematics in the data the evidence for a planetary companion to the lens is too tenuous to claim a secure detection. When combined with analyses of other high-magnification events, this event helps empirically define the threshold for reliable planet detection in high-magnification events, which remains an open question.
△ Less
Submitted 10 October, 2013; v1 submitted 22 October, 2012;
originally announced October 2012.
-
MOA-2010-BLG-477Lb: constraining the mass of a microlensing planet from microlensing parallax, orbital motion and detection of blended light
Authors:
E. Bachelet,
I. -G. Shin,
C. Han,
P. Fouqué,
A. Gould,
J. W. Menzies,
J. -P. Beaulieu,
D. P. Bennett,
I. A. Bond,
Subo Dong,
D. Heyrovský,
J. B. Marquette,
J. Marshall,
J. Skowron,
R. A. Street,
T. Sumi,
A. Udalski,
L. Abe,
K. Agabi,
M. D. Albrow,
W. Allen,
E. Bertin,
M. Bos,
D. M. Bramich,
J. Chavez
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Microlensing detections of cool planets are important for the construction of an unbiased sample to estimate the frequency of planets beyond the snow line, which is where giant planets are thought to form according to the core accretion theory of planet formation. In this paper, we report the discovery of a giant planet detected from the analysis of the light curve of a high-magnification microlen…
▽ More
Microlensing detections of cool planets are important for the construction of an unbiased sample to estimate the frequency of planets beyond the snow line, which is where giant planets are thought to form according to the core accretion theory of planet formation. In this paper, we report the discovery of a giant planet detected from the analysis of the light curve of a high-magnification microlensing event MOA-2010-BLG-477. The measured planet-star mass ratio is $q=(2.181\pm0.004)\times 10^{-3}$ and the projected separation is $s=1.1228\pm0.0006$ in units of the Einstein radius. The angular Einstein radius is unusually large $θ_{\rm E}=1.38\pm 0.11$ mas. Combining this measurement with constraints on the "microlens parallax" and the lens flux, we can only limit the host mass to the range $0.13<M/M_\odot<1.0$. In this particular case, the strong degeneracy between microlensing parallax and planet orbital motion prevents us from measuring more accurate host and planet masses. However, we find that adding Bayesian priors from two effects (Galactic model and Keplerian orbit) each independently favors the upper end of this mass range, yielding star and planet masses of $M_*=0.67^{+0.33}_{-0.13}\ M_\odot$ and $m_p=1.5^{+0.8}_{-0.3}\ M_{\rm JUP}$ at a distance of $D=2.3\pm0.6$ kpc, and with a semi-major axis of $a=2^{+3}_{-1}$ AU. Finally, we show that the lens mass can be determined from future high-resolution near-IR adaptive optics observations independently from two effects, photometric and astrometric.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2012;
originally announced May 2012.
