Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Kania, J W

Faraday tomography with CHIME: the `tadpole' feature G137+7

Authors: Nasser Mohammed, Anna Ordog, Rebecca A. Booth, Andrea Bracco, Jo-Anne C. Brown, Ettore Carretti, John M. Dickey, Simon Foreman, Mark Halpern, Marijke Haverkorn, Alex S. Hill, Joseph W Kania, Roland Kothes, T. L. Landecker, Joshua MacEachern, Kiyoshi W. Masui, Aimee Menard, Ryan R. Ransom, Wolfgang Reich, Patricia Reich, J. Richard Shaw, Seth R. Siegel, Mehrnoosh Tahani, Alec J. M. Thomson, Tristan Pinsonneault-Marotte , et al. (4 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: A direct consequence of Faraday rotation is that the polarized radio sky does not resemble the total intensity sky at long wavelengths. We analyze G137+7, which is undetectable in total intensity but appears as a depolarization feature. We use the first polarization maps from the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment. Our $400-729$ MHz bandwidth and angular resolution, $17'$ to $30'$, all… ▽ More A direct consequence of Faraday rotation is that the polarized radio sky does not resemble the total intensity sky at long wavelengths. We analyze G137+7, which is undetectable in total intensity but appears as a depolarization feature. We use the first polarization maps from the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment. Our $400-729$ MHz bandwidth and angular resolution, $17'$ to $30'$, allow us to use Faraday synthesis to analyze the polarization structure. In polarized intensity and polarization angle maps, we find a "tail" extending $10^\circ$ from the "head" and designate the combined object the "tadpole". Similar polarization angles, distinct from the background, indicate that the head and tail are physically associated. The head appears as a depolarized ring in single channels, but wideband observations show that it is a Faraday rotation feature. Our investigations of H I and H$α$ find no connections to the tadpole. The tail suggests motion of either the gas or an ionizing star through the ISM; the B2(e) star HD 20336 is a candidate. While the head features a coherent, $\sim -8$ rad m$^2$ Faraday depth, Faraday synthesis also identifies multiple components in both the head and tail. We verify the locations of the components in the spectra using QU fitting. Our results show that $\sim$octave-bandwidth Faraday rotation observations at $\sim 600$ MHz are sensitive to low-density ionized or partially-ionized gas which is undetectable in other tracers. △ Less

Submitted 24 May, 2024; originally announced May 2024.

Comments: Resubmitted to ApJ after referee report

Millisecond Cadence Radio Frequency Interference Filters

Authors: Joseph W. Kania, Kevin Bandura, Duncan R. Lorimer, Richard Prestage

Abstract: Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) greatly reduces sensitivity of radio observations to astrophysical signals and creates false positive candidates in searches for radio transients. Real signals are missed while considerable computational and human resources are needed to remove RFI candidates. In the context of transient astrophysics, this makes effective RFI removal vital to effective searches f… ▽ More Radio Frequency Interference (RFI) greatly reduces sensitivity of radio observations to astrophysical signals and creates false positive candidates in searches for radio transients. Real signals are missed while considerable computational and human resources are needed to remove RFI candidates. In the context of transient astrophysics, this makes effective RFI removal vital to effective searches for fast radio bursts and pulsars. Radio telescopes typically sample at rates that are high enough for there to be tens to hundreds of samples along the transient's pulse. Mitigation techniques should excise RFI on this timescale to account for a changing radio frequency environment. We evaluate the effectiveness of three filters, as well as a composite of the three, that excises RFI at the cadence that the data are recorded. Each of these filters operates in a different domain and thus excises as a different RFI morphology. We analyze the performance of these four filters in three different situations: (I) synthetic pulses in Gaussian noise; (II) synthetic pulses injected into real data; (III) four pulsar observations. From these tests, we gain insight into how the filters affect both the pulse and the noise level. This allows use to outline which and how the filters should be used based on the RFI present and the characteristics of the source signal. We show by flagging a small percentage of the spectrum we can substantially improve the quality of transit observations. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 11 pages, 8 figures

The First CHIME/FRB Fast Radio Burst Catalog

Authors: The CHIME/FRB Collaboration, :, Mandana Amiri, Bridget C. Andersen, Kevin Bandura, Sabrina Berger, Mohit Bhardwaj, Michelle M. Boyce, P. J. Boyle, Charanjot Brar, Daniela Breitman, Tomas Cassanelli, Pragya Chawla, Tianyue Chen, J. -F. Cliche, Amanda Cook, Davor Cubranic, Alice P. Curtin, Meiling Deng, Matt Dobbs, Fengqiu, Dong, Gwendolyn Eadie, Mateus Fandino, Emmanuel Fonseca , et al. (52 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present a catalog of 536 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Burst (CHIME/FRB) Project between 400 and 800 MHz from 2018 July 25 to 2019 July 1, including 62 bursts from 18 previously reported repeating sources. The catalog represents the first large sample, including bursts from repeaters and non-repeaters, observed in a single sur… ▽ More We present a catalog of 536 fast radio bursts (FRBs) detected by the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Burst (CHIME/FRB) Project between 400 and 800 MHz from 2018 July 25 to 2019 July 1, including 62 bursts from 18 previously reported repeating sources. The catalog represents the first large sample, including bursts from repeaters and non-repeaters, observed in a single survey with uniform selection effects. This facilitates comparative and absolute studies of the FRB population. We show that repeaters and apparent non-repeaters have sky locations and dispersion measures (DMs) that are consistent with being drawn from the same distribution. However, bursts from repeating sources differ from apparent non-repeaters in intrinsic temporal width and spectral bandwidth. Through injection of simulated events into our detection pipeline, we perform an absolute calibration of selection effects to account for systematic biases. We find evidence for a population of FRBs - comprising a large fraction of the overall population - with a scattering time at 600 MHz in excess of 10 ms, of which only a small fraction are observed by CHIME/FRB. We infer a power-law index for the cumulative fluence distribution of $α=-1.40\pm0.11(\textrm{stat.})^{+0.06}_{-0.09}(\textrm{sys.})$, consistent with the $-3/2$ expectation for a non-evolving population in Euclidean space. We find $α$ is steeper for high-DM events and shallower for low-DM events, which is what would be expected when DM is correlated with distance. We infer a sky rate of $[525\pm30(\textrm{stat.})^{+140}_{-130}({\textrm{sys.}})]/\textrm{sky}/\textrm{day}$ above a fluence of 5 Jy ms at 600 MHz, with scattering time at $600$ MHz under 10 ms, and DM above 100 pc cm$^{-3}$. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2023; v1 submitted 8 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 67 pages, 27 figures, 5 tables. Published in ApJS and updated with changes reflected in an erratum (affecting the sky rate). Extended figures and data at https://www.chime-frb.ca/catalog

Your: Your Unified Reader

Authors: Kshitij Aggarwal, Devansh Agarwal, Joseph W Kania, William Fiore, Reshma Anna Thomas, Scott M. Ransom, Paul B. Demorest, Robert S. Wharton, Sarah Burke-Spolaor, Duncan R. Lorimer, Maura A. Mclaughlin, Nathaniel Garver-Daniels

Abstract: The advancement in signal processing and GPU based systems has enabled new transient detectors at various telescopes to perform much more sensitive searches than their predecessors. Typically the data output from the telescopes is in one of the two commonly used formats: psrfits and Sigproc filterbank. Software developed for transient searches often only works with one of these two formats, limiti… ▽ More The advancement in signal processing and GPU based systems has enabled new transient detectors at various telescopes to perform much more sensitive searches than their predecessors. Typically the data output from the telescopes is in one of the two commonly used formats: psrfits and Sigproc filterbank. Software developed for transient searches often only works with one of these two formats, limiting their general applicability. Therefore, researchers have to write custom scripts to read/write the data in their format of choice before they can begin any data analysis relevant for their research. \textsc{Your} (Your Unified Reader) is a python-based library that unifies the data processing across multiple commonly used formats. \textsc{Your} implements a user-friendly interface to read and write in the data format of choice. It also generates unified metadata corresponding to the input data file for a quick understanding of observation parameters and provides utilities to perform common data analysis operations. \textsc{Your} also provides several state-of-the-art radio frequency interference mitigation (RFI) algorithms, which can now be used during any stage of data processing (reading, writing, etc.) to filter out artificial signals. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: 3 pages, Published in JOSS, Github: https://github.com/thepetabyteproject/your

A bright millisecond-duration radio burst from a Galactic magnetar

Authors: The CHIME/FRB Collaboration, :, B. C. Andersen, K. M. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, A. Bij, M. M. Boyce, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, T. Cassanelli, P. Chawla, T. Chen, J. -F. Cliche, A. Cook, D. Cubranic, A. P. Curtin, N. T. Denman, M. Dobbs, F. Q. Dong, M. Fandino, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, U. Giri, D. C. Good, M. Halpern , et al. (47 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Magnetars are highly magnetized young neutron stars that occasionally produce enormous bursts and flares of X-rays and gamma-rays. Of the approximately thirty magnetars currently known in our Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds, five have exhibited transient radio pulsations. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration bursts of radio waves arriving from cosmological distances. Some have been seen… ▽ More Magnetars are highly magnetized young neutron stars that occasionally produce enormous bursts and flares of X-rays and gamma-rays. Of the approximately thirty magnetars currently known in our Galaxy and Magellanic Clouds, five have exhibited transient radio pulsations. Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are millisecond-duration bursts of radio waves arriving from cosmological distances. Some have been seen to repeat. A leading model for repeating FRBs is that they are extragalactic magnetars, powered by their intense magnetic fields. However, a challenge to this model has been that FRBs must have radio luminosities many orders of magnitude larger than those seen from known Galactic magnetars. Here we report the detection of an extremely intense radio burst from the Galactic magnetar SGR 1935+2154 using the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) FRB project. The fluence of this two-component bright radio burst and the estimated distance to SGR 1935+2154 together imply a 400-800 MHz burst energy of $\sim 3 \times 10^{34}$ erg, which is three orders of magnitude brighter than those of any radio-emitting magnetar detected thus far. Such a burst coming from a nearby galaxy would be indistinguishable from a typical FRB. This event thus bridges a large fraction of the radio energy gap between the population of Galactic magnetars and FRBs, strongly supporting the notion that magnetars are the origin of at least some FRBs. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2020; v1 submitted 20 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: Submitted to Nature. This version: Geocentric arrival time corrected

Periodic activity from a fast radio burst source

Authors: The CHIME/FRB Collaboration, M. Amiri, B. C. Andersen, K. M. Bandura, M. Bhardwaj, P. J. Boyle, C. Brar, P. Chawla, T. Chen, J. F. Cliche, D. Cubranic, M. Deng, N. T. Denman, M. Dobbs, F. Q. Dong, M. Fandino, E. Fonseca, B. M. Gaensler, U. Giri, D. C. Good, M. Halpern, J. W. T. Hessels, A. S. Hill, C. Höfer, A. Josephy , et al. (48 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are bright, millisecond-duration radio transients originating from extragalactic distances. Their origin is unknown. Some FRB sources emit repeat bursts, ruling out cataclysmic origins for those events. Despite searches for periodicity in repeat burst arrival times on time scales from milliseconds to many days, these bursts have hitherto been observed to appear sporadicall… ▽ More Fast radio bursts (FRBs) are bright, millisecond-duration radio transients originating from extragalactic distances. Their origin is unknown. Some FRB sources emit repeat bursts, ruling out cataclysmic origins for those events. Despite searches for periodicity in repeat burst arrival times on time scales from milliseconds to many days, these bursts have hitherto been observed to appear sporadically, and though clustered, without a regular pattern. Here we report the detection of a $16.35\pm0.15$ day periodicity (or possibly a higher-frequency alias of that periodicity) from a repeating FRB 180916.J0158+65 detected by the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment Fast Radio Burst Project (CHIME/FRB). In 38 bursts recorded from September 16th, 2018 through February 4th, 2020, we find that all bursts arrive in a 5-day phase window, and 50% of the bursts arrive in a 0.6-day phase window. Our results suggest a mechanism for periodic modulation either of the burst emission itself, or through external amplification or absorption, and disfavour models invoking purely sporadic processes. △ Less

Submitted 18 June, 2020; v1 submitted 28 January, 2020; originally announced January 2020.

Journal ref: Nature, Volume 582, page 351--355 (2020)