Reimagining Heliophysics: A bold new vision for the next decade and beyond
Authors:
Ian J. Cohen,
Dan Baker,
Jacob Bortnik,
Pontus Brandt,
Jim Burch,
Amir Caspi,
George Clark,
Ofer Cohen,
Craig DeForest,
Gordon Emslie,
Matina Gkioulidou,
Alexa Halford,
Aleida Higginson,
Allison Jaynes,
Kristopher Klein,
Craig Kletzing,
Ryan McGranaghan,
David Miles,
Romina Nikoukar,
Katariina Nykyrii,
Larry Paxton,
Louise Prockter,
Harlan Spence,
William H. Swartz,
Drew L. Turner
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The field of Heliophysics has a branding problem. We need an answer to the question: ``What is Heliophysics\?'', the answer to which should clearly and succinctly defines our science in a compelling way that simultaneously introduces a sense of wonder and exploration into our science and our missions. Unfortunately, recent over-reliance on space weather to define our field, as opposed to simply us…
▽ More
The field of Heliophysics has a branding problem. We need an answer to the question: ``What is Heliophysics\?'', the answer to which should clearly and succinctly defines our science in a compelling way that simultaneously introduces a sense of wonder and exploration into our science and our missions. Unfortunately, recent over-reliance on space weather to define our field, as opposed to simply using it as a practical and relatable example of applied Heliophysics science, narrows the scope of what solar and space physics is and diminishes its fundamental importance. Moving forward, our community needs to be bold and unabashed in our definition of Heliophysics and its big questions. We should emphasize the general and fundamental importance and excitement of our science with a new mindset that generalizes and expands the definition of Heliophysics to include new ``frontiers'' of increasing interest to the community. Heliophysics should be unbound from its current confinement to the Sun-Earth connection and expanded to studies of the fundamental nature of space plasma physics across the solar system and greater cosmos. Finally, we need to come together as a community to advance our science by envisioning, prioritizing, and supporting -- with a unified voice -- a set of bold new missions that target compelling science questions - even if they do not explore the traditional Sun- and Earth-centric aspects of Heliophysics science. Such new, large missions to expand the frontiers and scope of Heliophysics science large missions can be the key to galvanizing the public and policymakers to support the overall Heliophysics program.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
Small Platforms, High Return: The Need to Enhance Investment in Small Satellites for Focused Science, Career Development, and Improved Equity
Authors:
James Paul Mason,
Robert G. Begbie,
Maitland Bowen,
Amir Caspi,
Phillip C. Chamberlin,
Amal Chandran,
Ian Cohen,
Edward E. DeLuca,
Alfred G. de Wijn,
Karin Dissauer,
Francis Eparvier,
Rachael Filwett,
Sarah Gibson,
Chris R. Gilly,
Vicki Herde,
George Ho,
George Hospodarsky,
Allison Jaynes,
Andrew R. Jones,
Justin C. Kasper,
Rick Kohnert,
Zoe Lee,
E. I. Mason,
Aimee Merkel,
Rafael Mesquita
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" r…
▽ More
In the next decade, there is an opportunity for very high return on investment of relatively small budgets by elevating the priority of smallsat funding in heliophysics. We've learned in the past decade that these missions perform exceptionally well by traditional metrics, e.g., papers/year/\$M (Spence et al. 2022 -- arXiv:2206.02968). It is also well established that there is a "leaky pipeline" resulting in too little diversity in leadership positions (see the National Academies Report at https://www.nationalacademies.org/our-work/increasing-diversity-in-the-leadership-of-competed-space-missions). Prioritizing smallsat funding would significantly increase the number of opportunities for new leaders to learn -- a crucial patch for the pipeline and an essential phase of career development. At present, however, there are far more proposers than the available funding can support, leading to selection ratios that can be as low as 6% -- in the bottom 0.5th percentile of selection ratios across the history of ROSES. Prioritizing SmallSat funding and substantially increasing that selection ratio are the fundamental recommendations being made by this white paper.
△ Less
Submitted 8 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
