-
Galaxies decomposition with spiral arms -- II: A multiwavelength case study of M 51
Authors:
Alexander A. Marchuk,
Ilia V. Chugunov,
George A. Gontcharov,
Aleksandr V. Mosenkov,
Vladimir B. Ilin,
Sergey S. Savchenko,
Anton A. Smirnov,
Denis M. Poliakov,
Jonah Seguine,
Maxim I. Chazov
Abstract:
Spiral structure can contribute significantly to a galaxy's luminosity. However, only rarely are proper photometric models of spiral arms used in decompositions. As we show in the previous work, including the spirals as a separate component in a photometric model of a galaxy would both allow to obtain their structural parameters, and reduce the systematic errors in estimating the parameters of oth…
▽ More
Spiral structure can contribute significantly to a galaxy's luminosity. However, only rarely are proper photometric models of spiral arms used in decompositions. As we show in the previous work, including the spirals as a separate component in a photometric model of a galaxy would both allow to obtain their structural parameters, and reduce the systematic errors in estimating the parameters of other components. Doing so in different wavebands, one can explore how their properties vary with the wavelength. In this paper, second in this series, we perform decomposition of M 51 in 17 bands, from the far UV to far IR, using imaging from the DustPedia project. We use the same 2D photometric model of spiral structure where each arm is modelled independently. The complex and asymmetric spiral structure in M 51 is reproduced relatively well with our model. We analyze the differences between models with and without spiral arms, and investigate how the fit parameters change with wavelength. In particular, we find that the spiral arms demonstrate the largest width in the optical, whereas their contribution to the galaxy luminosity is most significant in the UV. The disk central intensity drops by a factor of 1.25--3 and its exponential scale changes by 5--10\% when spiral arms are included, depending on wavelength. Taking into account the full light distribution across the arms, we do not observe the signs of a long-lived density wave in the spiral pattern of M 51 as a whole.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Prospects for future studies using deep imaging: Analysis of individual Galactic cirrus filaments
Authors:
Anton A. Smirnov,
Sergey S. Savchenko,
Denis M. Poliakov,
Alexander A. Marchuk,
Aleksandr V. Mosenkov,
Vladimir B. Ilin,
George A. Gontcharov,
Javier Roman,
Jonah Seguine
Abstract:
The presence of Galactic cirrus is an obstacle for studying both faint objects in our Galaxy and low surface brightness extragalactic structures. With the aim of studying individual cirrus filaments in SDSS Stripe 82 data, we develop techniques based on machine learning and neural networks that allow one to isolate filaments from foreground and background sources in the entirety of Stripe 82 with…
▽ More
The presence of Galactic cirrus is an obstacle for studying both faint objects in our Galaxy and low surface brightness extragalactic structures. With the aim of studying individual cirrus filaments in SDSS Stripe 82 data, we develop techniques based on machine learning and neural networks that allow one to isolate filaments from foreground and background sources in the entirety of Stripe 82 with a precision similar to that of the human expert. Our photometric study of individual filaments indicates that only those brighter than 26 mag arcsec$^{-2}$ in the SDSS $r$ band are likely to be identified in SDSS Stripe~82 data by their distinctive colours in the optical bands. We also show a significant impact of data processing (e.g. flat-fielding, masking of bright stars, and sky subtraction) on colour estimation. Analysing the distribution of filaments' colours with the help of mock simulations, we conclude that most filaments have colours in the following ranges: $0.55 \leq g-r \leq 0.73$ and $0.01 \leq r-i \leq 0.33$. Our work provides a useful framework for an analysis of all types of low surface brightness features (cirri, tidal tails, stellar streams, etc.) in existing and future deep optical surveys. For practical purposes, we provide the catalogue of dust filaments.
△ Less
Submitted 29 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Fractal dimension of optical cirrus in Stripe82
Authors:
Alexander A. Marchuk,
Anton A. Smirnov,
Aleksandr V. Mosenkov,
Vladimir B. Ilín,
George A. Gontcharov,
Sergey S. Savchenko,
Javier Román
Abstract:
The geometric characteristics of dust clouds provide important information on the physical processes that structure such clouds. One of such characteristics is the $2D$ fractal dimension $D$ of a cloud projected onto the sky plane. In previous studies, which were mostly based on infrared (IR) data, the fractal dimension of individual clouds was found to be in a range from 1.1 to 1.7 with a preferr…
▽ More
The geometric characteristics of dust clouds provide important information on the physical processes that structure such clouds. One of such characteristics is the $2D$ fractal dimension $D$ of a cloud projected onto the sky plane. In previous studies, which were mostly based on infrared (IR) data, the fractal dimension of individual clouds was found to be in a range from 1.1 to 1.7 with a preferred value of 1.2--1.4. In the present work, we use data from Stripe82 of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey to measure the fractal dimension of the cirrus clouds. This is done here for the first time for optical data with significantly better resolution as compared to IR data. To determine the fractal dimension, the perimeter-area method is employed. We also consider IR (IRAS and Herschel) counterparts of the corresponding optical fields to compare the results between the optical and IR. We find that the averaged fractal dimension across all clouds in the optical is $\langle D \rangle =1.69^{+0.05}_{-0.05}$ which is significantly larger then the fractal dimension of its IR counterparts $\langle D\rangle=1.38^{+0.07}_{-0.06}$. We examine several reasons for this discrepancy (choice of masking and minimal contour level, image and angular resolution, etc.) and find that for approximately half of our fields the different angular resolution (point spread function) of the optical and IR data can explain the difference between the corresponding fractal dimensions. For the other half of the fields, the fractal dimensions of the IR and visual data remain inconsistent, which can be associated with physical properties of the clouds, but further physical simulations are required to prove it.
△ Less
Submitted 28 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
