-
Near-infrared Spectral Characterization of Solar-type Stars in the Northern Hemisphere
Authors:
Collin D. Lewin,
Ellen S. Howell,
Ronald J. Vervack Jr,
Yanga R. Fernández,
Christopher Magri,
Sean E. Marshall,
Jenna L. Crowell,
Mary L. Hinkle
Abstract:
Although solar-analog stars have been studied extensively over the past few decades, most of these studies have focused on visible wavelengths, especially those identifying solar-analog stars to be used as calibration tools for observations. As a result, there is a dearth of well-characterized solar analogs for observations in the near-infrared, a wavelength range important for studying solar syst…
▽ More
Although solar-analog stars have been studied extensively over the past few decades, most of these studies have focused on visible wavelengths, especially those identifying solar-analog stars to be used as calibration tools for observations. As a result, there is a dearth of well-characterized solar analogs for observations in the near-infrared, a wavelength range important for studying solar system objects. We present 184 stars selected based on solar-like spectral type and V-J and V-K colors whose spectra we have observed in the 0.8-4.2 micron range for calibrating our asteroid observations. Each star has been classified into one of three ranks based on spectral resemblance to vetted solar analogs. Of our set of 184 stars, we report 145 as reliable solar-analog stars, 21 as solar analogs usable after spectral corrections with low-order polynomial fitting, and 18 as unsuitable for use as calibration standards owing to spectral shape, variability, or features at low to medium resolution. We conclude that all but 5 of our candidates are reliable solar analogs in the longer wavelength range from 2.5 to 4.2 microns. The average colors of the stars classified as reliable or usable solar analogs are V-J=1.148, V-H=1.418, and V-K=1.491, with the entire set being distributed fairly uniformly in R.A. across the sky between -27 and +67 degrees in decl.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
The Mission Accessible Near-Earth Objects Survey: Four years of photometry
Authors:
Audrey Thirouin,
Nicholas A. Moskovitz,
Richard P. Binzel,
Eric J. Christensen,
Francesca E. DeMeo,
Michael J. Person,
David Polishook,
Cristina A. Thomas,
David Trilling,
Mark C. Willman,
Brian Burt,
Mary L. Hinkle,
Teznie Pugh
Abstract:
Over 4.5 years, the Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS) assembled 228 Near-Earth Object (NEO) lightcurves. We report rotational lightcurves for 82 NEOs, constraints on amplitudes and periods for 21 NEOs, lightcurves with no detected variability within the image signal to noise and length of our observing block for 30 NEOs, and 10 tumblers. We uncovered 2 ultra-rapid rotators with p…
▽ More
Over 4.5 years, the Mission Accessible Near-Earth Object Survey (MANOS) assembled 228 Near-Earth Object (NEO) lightcurves. We report rotational lightcurves for 82 NEOs, constraints on amplitudes and periods for 21 NEOs, lightcurves with no detected variability within the image signal to noise and length of our observing block for 30 NEOs, and 10 tumblers. We uncovered 2 ultra-rapid rotators with periods below 20s; 2016MA with a potential rotational periodicity of 18.4s, and 2017QG$_{18}$ rotating in 11.9s, and estimate the fraction of fast/ultra-rapid rotators undetected in our project plus the percentage of NEOs with a moderate/long periodicity undetectable during our typical observing blocks. We summarize the findings of a simple model of synthetic NEOs to infer the object morphologies distribution using the measured distribution of lightcurve amplitudes. This model suggests a uniform distribution of axis ratio can reproduce the observed sample. This suggests that the quantity of spherical NEOs (e.g., Bennu) is almost equivalent to the quantity of highly elongated objects (e.g., Itokawa), a result that can be directly tested thanks to shape models from Doppler delay radar imaging analysis. Finally, we fully characterized 2 NEOs as appropriate targets for a potential robotic/human mission: 2013YS$_{2}$ and 2014FA$_{7}$ due to their moderate spin periods and low $Δv$.
△ Less
Submitted 10 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
A 2 km-size asteroid challenging the rubble-pile spin barrier - a case for cohesion
Authors:
D. Polishook,
N. Moskovitz,
R. P. Binzel,
B. Burt,
F. E. DeMeo,
M. L. Hinkle,
M. Lockhart,
M. Mommert,
M. Person,
A. Thirouin,
C. A. Thomas,
D. Trilling,
M. Willman,
O. Aharonson
Abstract:
The rubble pile spin barrier is an upper limit on the rotation rate of asteroids larger than ~200-300 m. Among thousands of asteroids with diameters larger than ~300 m, only a handful of asteroids are known to rotate faster than 2.0 h, all are in the sub-km range (<=0.6 km). Here we present photometric measurements suggesting that (60716) 2000 GD65, an S-complex, inner-main belt asteroid with a re…
▽ More
The rubble pile spin barrier is an upper limit on the rotation rate of asteroids larger than ~200-300 m. Among thousands of asteroids with diameters larger than ~300 m, only a handful of asteroids are known to rotate faster than 2.0 h, all are in the sub-km range (<=0.6 km). Here we present photometric measurements suggesting that (60716) 2000 GD65, an S-complex, inner-main belt asteroid with a relatively large diameter of 2.3 +0.6-0.7 km, completes one rotation in 1.9529+-0.0002 h. Its unique diameter and rotation period allow us to examine scenarios about asteroid internal structure and evolution: a rubble pile bound only by gravity; a rubble-pile with strong cohesion; a monolithic structure; an asteroid experiencing mass shedding; an asteroid experiencing YORP spin-up/down; and an asteroid with a unique octahedron shape results with a four-peak lightcurve and a 3.9 h period. We find that the most likely scenario includes a lunar-like cohesion that can prevent (60716) 2000 GD65 from disrupting without requiring a monolithic structure or a unique shape. Due to the uniqueness of (60716) 2000 GD65, we suggest that most asteroids typically have smaller cohesion than that of lunar regolith.
△ Less
Submitted 22 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
