-
Spitzer 70 and 160-micron Observations of the Extragalactic First Look Survey
Authors:
D. T. Frayer,
D. Fadda,
L. Yan,
F. R. Marleau,
P. I. Choi,
G. Helou,
B. T. Soifer,
P. N. Appleton,
L. Armus,
R. Beck,
H. Dole,
C. W. Engelbracht,
F. Fang,
K. D. Gordon,
I. Heinrichsen,
D. Henderson,
T. Hesselroth,
M. Im,
D. M. Kelly,
M. Lacy,
S. Laine,
W. B. Latter,
W. Mahoney,
D. Makovoz,
F. J. Masci
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present Spitzer 70um and 160um observations of the Spitzer extragalactic First Look Survey (xFLS). The data reduction techniques and the methods for producing co-added mosaics and source catalogs are discussed. Currently, 26% of the 70um sample and 49% of the 160um-selected sources have redshifts. The majority of sources with redshifts are star-forming galaxies at z<0.5, while about 5% have i…
▽ More
We present Spitzer 70um and 160um observations of the Spitzer extragalactic First Look Survey (xFLS). The data reduction techniques and the methods for producing co-added mosaics and source catalogs are discussed. Currently, 26% of the 70um sample and 49% of the 160um-selected sources have redshifts. The majority of sources with redshifts are star-forming galaxies at z<0.5, while about 5% have infrared colors consistent with AGN. The observed infrared colors agree with the spectral energy distribution (SEDs) of local galaxies previously determined from IRAS and ISO data. The average 160um/70um color temperature for the dust is Td~= 30+/-5 K, and the average 70um/24um spectral index is alpha~= 2.4+/-0.4. The observed infrared to radio correlation varies with redshift as expected out to z~1 based on the SEDs of local galaxies. The xFLS number counts at 70um and 160um are consistent within uncertainties with the models of galaxy evolution, but there are indications that the current models may require slight modifications. Deeper 70um observations are needed to constrain the models, and redshifts for the faint sources are required to measure the evolution of the infrared luminosity function.
△ Less
Submitted 21 September, 2005;
originally announced September 2005.
-
Reduction Algorithms for the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer: 6 Months of Flight Data
Authors:
K. D. Gordon,
G. H. Rieke,
C. W. Engelbracht,
J. Muzerolle,
J. A. Stansberry,
K. A. Misselt,
J. E. Morrison,
J. Cadien,
E. T. Young,
H. Dole,
D. M. Kelly,
A. Alonso-Herrero,
E. Egami,
K. Y. L. Su,
C. Papovich,
P. S. Smith,
D. C. Hines,
M. J. Rieke,
M. Blaylock,
P. Perez-Gonzalez,
E. LeFloc'h,
J. L. Hinz,
W. B. Latter,
T. Hesselroth,
D. T. Frayer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The first six months of flight data from the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) were used to test MIPS reduction algorithms based on extensive preflight laboratory data and modeling. The underlying approach for the preflight algorithms has been found to be sound, but some modifications have improved the performance. The main changes are scan mirror dependent flat fields at 24 micron…
▽ More
The first six months of flight data from the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) were used to test MIPS reduction algorithms based on extensive preflight laboratory data and modeling. The underlying approach for the preflight algorithms has been found to be sound, but some modifications have improved the performance. The main changes are scan mirror dependent flat fields at 24 micron, hand processing to remove the time dependent stim flash latents and fast/slow response variations at 70 micron, and the use of asteroids and other sources instead of stars for flux calibration at 160 micron due to a blue ``leak.'' The photometric accuracy of flux measurpements is currently 5%, 10%, and 20% at 24, 70, and 160 micron, respectively. These numbers are expected to improve as more flight data are analyzed and data reduction algorithms refined.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2005;
originally announced February 2005.
-
Reduction Algorithms for the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer
Authors:
K. D. Gordon,
G. H. Rieke,
C. W. Engelbracht,
J. Muzerolle,
J. A. Stansberry,
K. A. Misselt,
J. E. Morrison,
J. Cadien,
E. T. Young,
H. Dole,
D. M. Kelly,
A. Alonso-Herrero,
E. Egami,
K. Y. L. Su,
C. Papovich,
P. S. Smith,
D. C. Hines,
M. J. Rieke,
M. Blaylock,
W. B. Latter,
P. Perez-Gonzalez,
E. LeFloc'h,
J. L. Hinz,
T. Hesselroth,
D. T. Frayer
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We describe the data reduction algorithms for the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) instrument. These algorithms were based on extensive preflight testing and modeling of the Si:As (24 micron) and Ge:Ga (70 and 160 micron) arrays in MIPS and have been refined based on initial flight data. The behaviors we describe are typical of state-of-the-art infrared focal planes operated in th…
▽ More
We describe the data reduction algorithms for the Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) instrument. These algorithms were based on extensive preflight testing and modeling of the Si:As (24 micron) and Ge:Ga (70 and 160 micron) arrays in MIPS and have been refined based on initial flight data. The behaviors we describe are typical of state-of-the-art infrared focal planes operated in the low backgrounds of space. The Ge arrays are bulk photoconductors and therefore show a variety of artifacts that must be removed to calibrate the data. The Si array, while better behaved than the Ge arrays, does show a handful of artifacts that also must be removed to calibrate the data. The data reduction to remove these effects is divided into three parts. The first part converts the non-destructively read data ramps into slopes while removing artifacts with time constants of the order of the exposure time. The second part calibrates the slope measurements while removing artifacts with time constants longer than the exposure time. The third part uses the redundancy inherit in the MIPS observing modes to improve the artifact removal iteratively. For each of these steps, we illustrate the relevant laboratory experiments or theoretical arguments along with the mathematical approaches taken to calibrate the data. Finally, we describe how these preflight algorithms have performed on actual flight data.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2005;
originally announced February 2005.
