Selection functions of strong lens finding neural networks
Authors:
A. Herle,
C. M. O'Riordan,
S. Vegetti
Abstract:
Convolution Neural Networks trained for the task of lens finding with similar architecture and training data as is commonly found in the literature are biased classifiers. An understanding of the selection function of lens finding neural networks will be key to fully realising the potential of the large samples of strong gravitational lens systems that will be found in upcoming wide-field surveys.…
▽ More
Convolution Neural Networks trained for the task of lens finding with similar architecture and training data as is commonly found in the literature are biased classifiers. An understanding of the selection function of lens finding neural networks will be key to fully realising the potential of the large samples of strong gravitational lens systems that will be found in upcoming wide-field surveys. We use three training datasets, representative of those used to train galaxy-galaxy and galaxy-quasar lens finding neural networks. The networks preferentially select systems with larger Einstein radii and larger sources with more concentrated source-light distributions. Increasing the detection significance threshold to 12$σ$ from 8$σ$ results in 50 per cent of the selected strong lens systems having Einstein radii $θ_\mathrm{E}$ $\ge$ 1.04 arcsec from $θ_\mathrm{E}$ $\ge$ 0.879 arcsec, source radii $R_S$ $\ge$ 0.194 arcsec from $R_S$ $\ge$ 0.178 arcsec and source Sérsic indices $n_{\mathrm{Sc}}^{\mathrm{S}}$ $\ge$ 2.62 from $n_{\mathrm{Sc}}^{\mathrm{S}}$ $\ge$ 2.55. The model trained to find lensed quasars shows a stronger preference for higher lens ellipticities than those trained to find lensed galaxies. The selection function is independent of the slope of the power-law of the mass profiles, hence measurements of this quantity will be unaffected. The lens finder selection function reinforces that of the lensing cross-section, and thus we expect our findings to be a general result for all galaxy-galaxy and galaxy-quasar lens finding neural networks.
△ Less
Submitted 19 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
The impact of human expert visual inspection on the discovery of strong gravitational lenses
Authors:
Karina Rojas,
Thomas E. Collett,
Daniel Ballard,
Mark R. Magee,
Simon Birrer,
Elizabeth Buckley-Geer.,
James H. H. Chan,
Benjamin Clément,
José M. Diego,
Fabrizio Gentile,
Jimena González,
Rémy Joseph,
Jorge Mastache,
Stefan Schuldt,
Crescenzo Tortora,
Tomás Verdugo,
Aprajita Verma,
Tansu Daylan,
Martin Millon,
Neal Jackson,
Simon Dye,
Alejandra Melo,
Guillaume Mahler,
Ricardo L. C. Ogando,
Frédéric Courbin
, et al. (31 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, an…
▽ More
We investigate the ability of human 'expert' classifiers to identify strong gravitational lens candidates in Dark Energy Survey like imaging. We recruited a total of 55 people that completed more than 25$\%$ of the project. During the classification task, we present to the participants 1489 images. The sample contains a variety of data including lens simulations, real lenses, non-lens examples, and unlabeled data. We find that experts are extremely good at finding bright, well-resolved Einstein rings, whilst arcs with $g$-band signal-to-noise less than $\sim$25 or Einstein radii less than $\sim$1.2 times the seeing are rarely recovered. Very few non-lenses are scored highly. There is substantial variation in the performance of individual classifiers, but they do not appear to depend on the classifier's experience, confidence or academic position. These variations can be mitigated with a team of 6 or more independent classifiers. Our results give confidence that humans are a reliable pruning step for lens candidates, providing pure and quantifiably complete samples for follow-up studies.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2023; v1 submitted 9 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
