Weighing obscured and unobscured quasar hosts with the CMB
Authors:
M. A. DiPompeo,
A. D. Myers,
R. C. Hickox,
J. E. Geach,
G. Holder,
K. N. Hainline,
S. W. Hall
Abstract:
We cross-correlate a cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map with the projected space densities of quasars to measure the bias and halo masses of a quasar sample split into obscured and unobscured populations, the first application of this method to distinct quasar subclasses. Several recent studies of the angular clustering of obscured quasars have shown that these objects likely reside in…
▽ More
We cross-correlate a cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing map with the projected space densities of quasars to measure the bias and halo masses of a quasar sample split into obscured and unobscured populations, the first application of this method to distinct quasar subclasses. Several recent studies of the angular clustering of obscured quasars have shown that these objects likely reside in higher-mass halos compared to their unobscured counterparts. This has important implications for models of the structure and geometry of quasars, their role in growing supermassive black holes, and mutual quasar/host galaxy evolution. However, the magnitude and significance of this difference has varied from study to study. Using data from \planck, \wise, and SDSS, we follow up on these results using the independent method of CMB lensing cross-correlations. The region and sample are identical to that used for recent angular clustering measurements, allowing for a direct comparison of the CMB-lensing and angular clustering methods. At $z \sim 1$, we find that the bias of obscured quasars is $b_q = 2.57 \pm 0.24$, while that of unobscured quasars is $b_q = 1.89 \pm 0.19$. This corresponds to halo masses of $\log (M_h / M_{\odot} h^{-1}) = 13.24_{-0.15}^{+0.14}$ (obscured) and $\log (M_h / M_{\odot} h^{-1}) = 12.71_{-0.13}^{+0.15}$ (unobscured). These results agree well with with those from angular clustering (well within $1σ$), and confirm that obscured quasars reside in host halos $\sim$3 times as massive as halos hosting unobscured quasars. This implies that quasars spend a significant portion of their lifetime in an obscured state, possibly more than one half of the entire active phase.
△ Less
Submitted 3 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
Radio-Loud and Radio-Quiet BAL Quasars: A Detailed Ultraviolet Comparison
Authors:
Thomas B. Rochais,
Michael A. DiPompeo,
Adam D. Myers,
Michael S. Brotherton,
Jessie C. Runnoe,
Shannon W. Hall
Abstract:
Studies of radio-loud (RL) broad absorption line (BAL) quasars indicate that popular orientation-based BAL models fail to account for all observations. Are these results extendable to radio-quiet (RQ) BAL quasars? Comparisons of RL and RQ BAL quasars show that many of their properties are quite similar. Here we extend these analyses to the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) spectral properties, using a s…
▽ More
Studies of radio-loud (RL) broad absorption line (BAL) quasars indicate that popular orientation-based BAL models fail to account for all observations. Are these results extendable to radio-quiet (RQ) BAL quasars? Comparisons of RL and RQ BAL quasars show that many of their properties are quite similar. Here we extend these analyses to the rest-frame ultraviolet (UV) spectral properties, using a sample of 73 RL and 473 RQ BAL quasars selected from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Each RQ quasar is individually matched to a RL quasar in both redshift (over the range $1.5 < z < 3.5$) and continuum luminosity. We compare several continuum, emission line, and absorption line properties, as well as physical properties derived from these measurements. Most properties in the samples are statistically identical, though we find slight differences in the velocity structure of the BALs that cause apparent differences in CIV emission line properties. Differences in the velocities may indicate an interaction between the radio jets and the absorbing material. We also find that UV FeII emission is marginally stronger in RL BAL quasars. All of these differences are subtle, so in general we conclude that RL and RQ BAL QSOs are not fundamentally different objects, except in their radio properties. They are therefore likely to be driven by similar physical phenomena, suggesting that results from samples of RL BAL quasars can be extended to their RQ counterparts.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2014;
originally announced August 2014.
