-
Mapping Physical Conditions in Neighboring Hot Cores: NOEMA Studies of W3(H$_2$O) and W3(OH)
Authors:
Morgan M. Giese,
Will E. Thompson,
Dariusz C. Lis,
Susanna L. Widicus Weaver
Abstract:
The complex chemistry that occurs in star-forming regions can provide insight into the formation of prebiotic molecules at various evolutionary stages of star formation. To study this process, we present millimeter-wave interferometric observations of the neighboring hot cores W3(H$_2$O) and W3(OH) carried out using the NOEMA interferometer. We have analyzed distributions of six molecules that acc…
▽ More
The complex chemistry that occurs in star-forming regions can provide insight into the formation of prebiotic molecules at various evolutionary stages of star formation. To study this process, we present millimeter-wave interferometric observations of the neighboring hot cores W3(H$_2$O) and W3(OH) carried out using the NOEMA interferometer. We have analyzed distributions of six molecules that account for most observed lines across both cores and have constructed physical parameter maps for rotational temperature, column density, and velocity field with corresponding uncertainties. We discuss the derived spatial distributions of these parameters in the context of the physical structure of the source. We propose the use of HCOOCH$_3$ as a new temperature tracer in W3(H$_2$O) and W3(OH) in addition to the more commonly used CH$_3$CN. By analyzing the physically-derived parameters for each molecule across both W3(H$_2$O) and W3(OH), the work presented herein further demonstrates the impact of physical environment on hot cores at different evolutionary stages.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2023; v1 submitted 18 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
The RS Oph outburst of 2021 monitored in X-rays with NICER
Authors:
Marina Orio,
Keith Gendreau,
Morgan Giese,
Gerardo Juna M. Luna,
Jozef Magdolen,
Tod E. Strohmayer,
Andy E. Zhang,
Diego Altamirano,
Andrej Dobrotka,
Teruaki Enoto,
Elizabeth C. Ferrara,
Richard Ignace,
Sebastian heinz,
Craig Markwardt,
Joy S. Nichols,
Micahel L. Parker,
Dheerajay R. Pasham,
Songpeng Pei,
Pragati Pradhan,
Ron Remillard,
James F. Steiner,
Francesco Tombesi
Abstract:
The 2021 outburst of the symbiotic recurrent nova RS Oph was monitored with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer Mission (NICER) in the 0.2-12 keV range from day one after the optical maximum, until day 88, producing an unprecedented, detailed view of the outburst development. The X-ray flux preceding the supersoft X-ray phase peaked almost 5 days after optical maximum and originated onl…
▽ More
The 2021 outburst of the symbiotic recurrent nova RS Oph was monitored with the Neutron Star Interior Composition Explorer Mission (NICER) in the 0.2-12 keV range from day one after the optical maximum, until day 88, producing an unprecedented, detailed view of the outburst development. The X-ray flux preceding the supersoft X-ray phase peaked almost 5 days after optical maximum and originated only in shocked ejecta for 21 to 25 days. The emission was thermal; in the first 5 days only a non-collisional-ionization equilibrium model fits the spectrum, and a transition to equilibrium occurred between days 6 and 12. The ratio of peak X-rays flux measured in the NICER range to that measured with Fermi in the 60 MeV-500 GeV range was about 0.1, and the ratio to the peak flux measured with H.E.S.S. in the 250 GeV-2.5 TeV range was about 100. The central supersoft X-ray source (SSS), namely the shell hydrogen burning white dwarf (WD), became visible in the fourth week, initially with short flares. A huge increase in flux occurred on day 41, but the SSS flux remained variable. A quasi-periodic oscillation every ~35 s was always observed during the SSS phase, with variations in amplitude and a period drift that appeared to decrease in the end. The SSS has characteristics of a WD of mass >1 M(solar). Thermonuclear burning switched off shortly after day 75, earlier than in 2006 outburst. We discuss implications for the nova physics.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Comparing Complex Chemistry in Neighboring Hot Cores: NOEMA Studies of W3(H$_{2}$O) and W3(OH)
Authors:
Will E. Thompson,
Morgan M. Giese,
Dariusz C. Lis,
Susanna L. Widicus Weaver
Abstract:
Presented here are NOEMA interferometric observations of the neighboring hot cores W3(H$_{2}$O) and W3(OH). The presence of two star-forming cores at different evolutionary stages within the same parent cloud presents a unique opportunity to study how the physics of the source and its evolutionary stage impact the chemistry. Through spectral analysis and imaging, we identify over twenty molecules…
▽ More
Presented here are NOEMA interferometric observations of the neighboring hot cores W3(H$_{2}$O) and W3(OH). The presence of two star-forming cores at different evolutionary stages within the same parent cloud presents a unique opportunity to study how the physics of the source and its evolutionary stage impact the chemistry. Through spectral analysis and imaging, we identify over twenty molecules in these cores. Most notably, we have detected HDO and CH$_{3}$CH$_{2}$CN in W3(OH), which were previously not detected in this core. We have imaged the molecular emission, revealing new structural features within these sources. W3(OH) shows absorption in a "dusty cocoon" surrounded by molecular emission. These observations also reveal extended emission that is potentially indicative of a low-velocity shock. From the information obtained herein, we have constructed column density and temperature maps for methanol and compared this information to the molecular images. By comparing the spatial distribution of molecules which may be destroyed at later stages of star formation, this work demonstrates the impact of physical environment on chemistry in star-forming regions at different evolutionary stages.
△ Less
Submitted 18 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
NICER monitoring of supersoft X-ray sources
Authors:
M. Orio,
K. Gendreau,
M. Giese,
J. G. M. Luna,
J. Magdolen,
S. Pei,
B. Sun,
E. Behar,
A. Dobrotka,
J. Mikolajewska,
D. R. Pasham,
T. E. Strohmayer
Abstract:
We monitored four supersoft sources - two persistent ones, CAL 83 and MR Vel, and the recent novae YZ Ret (Nova Ret 2020) and V1674 Her (Nova Her 2021) - with NICER. The two persistent SSS were observed with unvaried X-ray flux level and spectrum, respectively, 13 and 20 years after the last observations. Short period modulations of the supersoft X-ray source (SSS) appear where the spectrum of the…
▽ More
We monitored four supersoft sources - two persistent ones, CAL 83 and MR Vel, and the recent novae YZ Ret (Nova Ret 2020) and V1674 Her (Nova Her 2021) - with NICER. The two persistent SSS were observed with unvaried X-ray flux level and spectrum, respectively, 13 and 20 years after the last observations. Short period modulations of the supersoft X-ray source (SSS) appear where the spectrum of the luminous central source was fully visibl (in CAL 83 and V1674 Her) and were absent in YZ Ret and MR Vel, in which the flux originated in photoionized or shocked plasma, while the white dwarf (WD) was not observable. We thus suggest that the pulsations occur on, or very close to, the WD surface. The pulsations of CAL 83 were almost unvaried after 15 years, including an irregular drift of the $\simeq$67 s period by 2.1 s. Simulations, including previous XMM-Newton data, indicate actual variations in period length within hours, rather than an artifact of the variable amplitude of the pulsations. Large amplitude pulsations with a period of 501.53$\pm$0.30 s were always detected in V1674 Her, as long as the SSS was observable. This period seems to be due to rotation of a highly magnetized WD.We cannot confirm the maximum effective temperature of ($\simeq$145,000 K) previously inferred for this nova, and discuss the difficulty in interpreting its spectrum. The WD appears to present two surface zones, one of which does not emit SSS flux.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
