-
The Fourth Fermi-GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: A Decade of Data
Authors:
A. von Kienlin,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
M. S. Briggs,
E. Burns,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
A. Goldstein,
R. Hamburg,
C. M. Hui,
D. Kocevski,
B. Mailyan,
C. Malacaria,
S. Poolakkil,
R. D. Preece,
O. J. Roberts,
P. Veres,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge
Abstract:
We present the fourth in a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed with Fermi's Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM). It extends the six year catalog by four more years, now covering the ten year time period from trigger enabling on 2008 July 12 to 2018 July 11. During this time period GBM triggered almost twice a day on transient events of which we identifyied 2356 as cosmic GRBs. A…
▽ More
We present the fourth in a series of catalogs of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed with Fermi's Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (Fermi-GBM). It extends the six year catalog by four more years, now covering the ten year time period from trigger enabling on 2008 July 12 to 2018 July 11. During this time period GBM triggered almost twice a day on transient events of which we identifyied 2356 as cosmic GRBs. Additional trigger events were due to solar are events, magnetar burst activities, and terrestrial gamma-ray flashes. The intention of the GBM GRB catalog series is to provide updated information to the community on the most important observables of the GBM-detected GRBs. For each GRB the location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak flux, and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the 50-300 keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the instrument reference system is observed and also for a broader energy band from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy detectors. Furthermore, information is given on the settings of the triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years 7 to 10 in the mission. This fourth catalog is an official product of the Fermi-GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2020; v1 submitted 26 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Evaluation of Automated Fermi GBM Localizations of Gamma-ray Bursts
Authors:
Adam Goldstein,
Corinne Fletcher,
Peter Veres,
Michael S. Briggs,
William H. Cleveland,
Melissa H. Gibby,
C. Michelle Hui,
Elisabetta Bissaldi,
Eric Burns,
Rachel Hamburg,
Andreas von Kienlin,
Daniel Kocevski,
Bagrat Mailyan,
Christian Malacaria,
William S. Paciesas,
Oliver J. Roberts,
Colleen A. Wilson-Hodge
Abstract:
The capability of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) to localize gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is evaluated for two different automated algorithms: the GBM Team's RoboBA algorithm and the independently developed BALROG algorithm. Through a systematic study utilizing over 500 GRBs with known locations from instruments like Swift and the Fermi LAT, we directly compare the effectiveness of, and accura…
▽ More
The capability of the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) to localize gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) is evaluated for two different automated algorithms: the GBM Team's RoboBA algorithm and the independently developed BALROG algorithm. Through a systematic study utilizing over 500 GRBs with known locations from instruments like Swift and the Fermi LAT, we directly compare the effectiveness of, and accurately estimate the systematic uncertainty for, both algorithms. We show simple adjustments to the GBM Team's RoboBA, in operation since early 2016, yields significant improvement in the systematic uncertainty, removing the long tail identified in the systematic, and improves the overall accuracy. The systematic uncertainty for the updated RoboBA localizations is $1.8^\circ$ for 52% of GRBs and $4.1^\circ$ for the remaining 48%. Both from public reporting by BALROG and our systematic study, we find the systematic uncertainty of $1-2^\circ$ quoted in GCN circulars for bright GRBs localized by BALROG is an underestimate of the true magnitude of the systematic, which we find to be $2.7^\circ$ for 74% of GRBs and $33^\circ$ for the remaining 26%. We show that, once the systematic uncertainty is considered, the RoboBA 90% localization confidence regions can be more than an order of magnitude smaller in area than those produced by BALROG.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2020; v1 submitted 6 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
-
Fermi GBM Observations of GRB 150101B: A Second Nearby Event with a Short Hard Spike and a Soft Tail
Authors:
E. Burns,
P. Veres,
V. Connaughton,
J. Racusin,
M. S. Briggs,
N. Christensen,
A. Goldstein,
R. Hamburg,
D. Kocevski,
J. McEnery,
E. Bissaldi,
T. Dal Canton,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. H. Gibby,
C. M. Hui,
A. von Kienlin,
B. Mailyan,
W. S. Paciesas,
O. J. Roberts,
K. Siellez,
M. Stanbro,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge
Abstract:
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent two-component nature is…
▽ More
In light of the joint multimessenger detection of a binary neutron star merger as the gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A and in gravitational waves as GW170817, we reanalyze the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor data of one of the closest short gamma-ray bursts: GRB 150101B. We find this burst is composed of a short hard spike followed by a comparatively long soft tail. This apparent two-component nature is phenomenologically similar to that of GRB 170817A. While GRB 170817A was distinct from the previously known population of short gamma-ray bursts in terms of its prompt intrinsic energetics, GRB 150101B is not. Despite these differences, GRB 150101B can be modeled as a more on-axis version of GRB 170817A. Identifying a similar signature in two of the closest short gamma-ray bursts suggests the soft tail is common, but generally undetectable in more distant events. If so, it will be possible to identify nearby short gamma-ray bursts from the prompt gamma-ray emission alone, aiding the search for kilonovae.
△ Less
Submitted 6 August, 2018; v1 submitted 8 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
-
On the interpretation of the Fermi GBM transient observed in coincidence with LIGO Gravitational Wave Event GW150914
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
D. Kocevski,
T. Littenberg,
J. E. McEnery,
J. Racusin,
P. Shawhan,
J. Veitch,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
W. Cleveland,
M. M. Giles,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
R. M. Kippen,
S. McBreen,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
R. D. Preece
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914 and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an…
▽ More
The weak transient detected by the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) 0.4 s after GW150914 has generated much speculation regarding its possible association with the black-hole binary merger. Investigation of the GBM data by Connaughton et al. (2016) revealed a source location consistent with GW150914 and a spectrum consistent with a weak, short Gamma-Ray Burst.
Greiner et al. (2016) present an alternative technique for fitting background-limited data in the low-count regime, and call into question the spectral analysis and the significance of the detection of GW150914-GBM presented in Connaughton et al. (2016). The spectral analysis of Connaughton et al. (2016) is not subject to the limitations of the low-count regime noted by Greiner et al. (2016). We find Greiner et al. (2016) used an inconsistent source position and did not follow the steps taken in Connaughton et al. (2016) to mitigate the statistical shortcomings of their software when analyzing this weak event. We use the approach of Greiner et al. (2016) to verify that our original spectral analysis is not biased.
The detection significance of GW150914-GBM is established empirically, with a False Alarm Rate (FAR) of $\sim 10^{-4}$~Hz. A post-trials False Alarm Probability (FAP) of $2.2 \times 10^{-3}$ ($2.9 σ$) of this transient being associated with GW150914 is based on the proximity in time to the GW event of a transient with that FAR. The FAR and the FAP are unaffected by the spectral analysis that is the focus of Greiner et al. (2016).
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
An Ordinary Short Gamma-Ray Burst with Extraordinary Implications: Fermi-GBM Detection of GRB 170817A
Authors:
A. Goldstein,
P. Veres,
E. Burns,
M. S. Briggs,
R. Hamburg,
D. Kocevski,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
R. D. Preece,
S. Poolakkil,
O. J. Roberts,
C. M. Hui,
V. Connaughton,
J. Racusin,
A. von Kienlin,
T. Dal Canton,
N. Christensen,
T. B. Littenberg,
K. Siellez,
L. Blackburn,
J. Broida,
E. Bissaldi,
W. H. Cleveland,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
R. M. Kippen
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately 1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of gravitational waves and electr…
▽ More
On August 17, 2017 at 12:41:06 UTC the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) detected and triggered on the short gamma-ray burst GRB 170817A. Approximately 1.7 s prior to this GRB, the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) triggered on a binary compact merger candidate associated with the GRB. This is the first unambiguous coincident observation of gravitational waves and electromagnetic radiation from a single astrophysical source and marks the start of gravitational-wave multi-messenger astronomy. We report the GBM observations and analysis of this ordinary short GRB, which extraordinarily confirms that at least some short GRBs are produced by binary compact mergers.
△ Less
Submitted 16 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Searching the Gamma-ray Sky for Counterparts to Gravitational Wave Sources: Fermi GBM and LAT Observations of LVT151012 and GW151226
Authors:
J. L. Racusin,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
V. Connaughton,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. Jenke,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
J. Broida,
J. Camp,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
T. Littenberg,
P. Shawhan,
L. Singer,
J. Veitch,
P. N. Bhat,
W. Cleveland,
G. Fitzpatrick,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
S. McBreen,
B. Mailyan,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas
, et al. (116 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope (LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated pipelines and new techn…
▽ More
We present the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) and Large Area Telescope (LAT) observations of the LIGO binary black hole merger event GW151226 and candi- date LVT151012. No candidate electromagnetic counterparts were detected by either the GBM or LAT. We present a detailed analysis of the GBM and LAT data over a range of timescales from seconds to years, using automated pipelines and new techniques for char- acterizing the upper limits across a large area of the sky. Due to the partial GBM and LAT coverage of the large LIGO localization regions at the trigger times for both events, dif- ferences in source distances and masses, as well as the uncertain degree to which emission from these sources could be beamed, these non-detections cannot be used to constrain the variety of theoretical models recently applied to explain the candidate GBM counterpart to GW150914.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Supplement: Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the dif…
▽ More
This Supplement provides supporting material for arXiv:1602.08492 . We briefly summarize past electromagnetic (EM) follow-up efforts as well as the organization and policy of the current EM follow-up program. We compare the four probability sky maps produced for the gravitational-wave transient GW150914, and provide additional details of the EM follow-up observations that were performed in the different bands.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 April, 2016;
originally announced April 2016.
-
The 3rd Fermi GBM Gamma-Ray Burst Catalog: The First Six Years
Authors:
P. Narayana Bhat,
Charles A. Meegan,
Andreas von Kienlin,
William S. Paciesas,
Michael S. Briggs,
J. Michael Burgess,
Eric Burns,
Vandiver Chaplin,
William H. Cleveland,
Andrew C. Collazzi,
Valerie Connaughto,
Anne M. Diekmann,
Gerard Fitzpatrick,
Melissa H. Gibby,
Misty M. Giles,
Adam M. Goldstein,
Jochen Greiner,
Peter A. Jenke,
R. Marc Kippen,
Chryssa Kouveliotou,
Bagrat Mailyan,
Sheila McBreen,
Veronique Pelassa,
Robert D. Preece,
Oliver J. Roberts
, et al. (8 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The intention of the…
▽ More
Since its launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has triggered and located on average approximately two gamma-ray bursts (GRB) every three days. Here we present the third of a series of catalogs of GRBs detected by GBM, extending the second catalog by two more years, through the middle of July 2014. The resulting list includes 1405 triggers identified as GRBs. The intention of the GBM GRB catalog is to provide information to the community on the most important observables of the GBM detected GRBs. For each GRB the location and main characteristics of the prompt emission, the duration, peak flux and fluence are derived. The latter two quantities are calculated for the 50-300~keV energy band, where the maximum energy release of GRBs in the instrument reference system is observed, and also for a broader energy band from 10-1000 keV, exploiting the full energy range of GBM's low-energy NaI(Tl) detectors. Using statistical methods to assess clustering, we find that the hardness and duration of GRBs are better fitted by a two-component model with short-hard and long-soft bursts, than by a model with three components. Furthermore, information is provided on the settings and modifications of the triggering criteria and exceptional operational conditions during years five and six in the mission. This third catalog is an official product of the Fermi GBM science team, and the data files containing the complete results are available from the High-Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center (HEASARC).
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2016;
originally announced March 2016.
-
Localization and broadband follow-up of the gravitational-wave transient GW150914
Authors:
B. P. Abbott,
R. Abbott,
T. D. Abbott,
M. R. Abernathy,
F. Acernese,
K. Ackley,
C. Adams,
T. Adams,
P. Addesso,
R. X. Adhikari,
V. B. Adya,
C. Affeldt,
M. Agathos,
K. Agatsuma,
N. Aggarwal,
O. D. Aguiar,
L. Aiello,
A. Ain,
P. Ajith,
B. Allen,
A. Allocca,
P. A. Altin,
S. B. Anderson,
W. G. Anderson,
K. Arai
, et al. (1522 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared wit…
▽ More
A gravitational-wave (GW) transient was identified in data recorded by the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) detectors on 2015 September 14. The event, initially designated G184098 and later given the name GW150914, is described in detail elsewhere. By prior arrangement, preliminary estimates of the time, significance, and sky location of the event were shared with 63 teams of observers covering radio, optical, near-infrared, X-ray, and gamma-ray wavelengths with ground- and space-based facilities. In this Letter we describe the low-latency analysis of the GW data and present the sky localization of the first observed compact binary merger. We summarize the follow-up observations reported by 25 teams via private Gamma-ray Coordinates Network circulars, giving an overview of the participating facilities, the GW sky localization coverage, the timeline and depth of the observations. As this event turned out to be a binary black hole merger, there is little expectation of a detectable electromagnetic (EM) signature. Nevertheless, this first broadband campaign to search for a counterpart of an Advanced LIGO source represents a milestone and highlights the broad capabilities of the transient astronomy community and the observing strategies that have been developed to pursue neutron star binary merger events. Detailed investigations of the EM data and results of the EM follow-up campaign are being disseminated in papers by the individual teams.
△ Less
Submitted 21 July, 2016; v1 submitted 26 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
Fermi GBM Observations of LIGO Gravitational Wave event GW150914
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
E. Burns,
A. Goldstein,
L. Blackburn,
M. S. Briggs,
B. -B. Zhang,
J. Camp,
N. Christensen,
C. M. Hui,
P. Jenke,
T. Littenberg,
J. E. McEnery,
J. Racusin,
P. Shawhan,
L. Singer,
J. Veitch,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
W. Cleveland,
G. Fitzpatrick,
M. M. Giles,
M. H. Gibby,
A. von Kienlin,
R. M. Kippen
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914 reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event, with a false alarm…
▽ More
With an instantaneous view of 70% of the sky, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) is an excellent partner in the search for electromagnetic counterparts to gravitational wave (GW) events. GBM observations at the time of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Observatory (LIGO) event GW150914 reveal the presence of a weak transient above 50 keV, 0.4~s after the GW event, with a false alarm probability of 0.0022 (2.9$σ$). This weak transient lasting 1 s was not detected by any other instrument and does not appear connected with other previously known astrophysical, solar, terrestrial, or magnetospheric activity. Its localization is ill-constrained but consistent with the direction of GW150914. The duration and spectrum of the transient event are consistent with a weak short Gamma-Ray Burst arriving at a large angle to the direction in which Fermi was pointing, where the GBM detector response is not optimal. If the GBM transient is associated with GW150914, this electromagnetic signal from a stellar mass black hole binary merger is unexpected. We calculate a luminosity in hard X-ray emission between 1~keV and 10~MeV of $1.8^{+1.5}_{-1.0} \times 10^{49}$~erg~s$^{-1}$. Future joint observations of GW events by LIGO/Virgo and Fermi GBM could reveal whether the weak transient reported here is a plausible counterpart to GW150914 or a chance coincidence, and will further probe the connection between compact binary mergers and short Gamma-Ray Bursts.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2016; v1 submitted 11 February, 2016;
originally announced February 2016.
-
The Five Year Fermi/GBM Magnetar Burst Catalog
Authors:
A. C. Collazzi,
C. Kouveliotou,
A. J. van der Horst,
G. A. Younes,
Y. Kaneko,
E. Gogus,
L. Lin,
J. Granot,
M. H. Finger,
V. L. Chaplin,
D. Huppenkothen,
A. L. Watts,
A. von Kienlin,
M. G. Baring,
D. Gruber,
P. N. Bhat,
M. H. Gibby,
N. Gehrels,
J. McEnery,
M. van der Klis,
R. A. M. J. Wijers
Abstract:
Since launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected many hundreds of bursts from magnetar sources. While the vast majority of these bursts have been attributed to several known magnetars, there is also a small sample of magnetar-like bursts of unknown origin. Here we present the Fermi/GBM magnetar catalog, giving the results of the temporal and spectral analyses of 440 magne…
▽ More
Since launch in 2008, the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected many hundreds of bursts from magnetar sources. While the vast majority of these bursts have been attributed to several known magnetars, there is also a small sample of magnetar-like bursts of unknown origin. Here we present the Fermi/GBM magnetar catalog, giving the results of the temporal and spectral analyses of 440 magnetar bursts with high temporal and spectral resolution. This catalog covers the first five years of GBM magnetar observations, from July 2008 to June 2013. We provide durations, spectral parameters for various models, fluences and peak fluxes for all the bursts, as well as a detailed temporal analysis for SGR J1550-5418 bursts. Finally, we suggest that some of the bursts of unknown origin are associated with the newly discovered magnetar 3XMM J185246.6+0033.7.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2015; v1 submitted 13 March, 2015;
originally announced March 2015.
-
Localization of Gamma-Ray Bursts using the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Authors:
V. Connaughton,
M. S. Briggs,
A. Goldstein,
C. A. Meegan,
W. S. Paciesas,
R. D. Preece,
C. A. Wilson-Hodge,
M. H. Gibby,
J. Greiner,
D. Gruber,
P. Jenke,
R. M. Kippen,
V. Pelassa,
S. Xiong,
H. -F. Yu,
P. N. Bhat,
J. M. Burgess,
D. Byrne,
G. Fitzpatrick,
S. Foley,
M. M. Giles,
S. Guiriec,
A. J. van der Horst,
A. von Kienlin,
S. McBreen
, et al. (3 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations. We find that the reporte…
▽ More
The Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) has detected over 1400 Gamma-Ray Bursts (GRBs) since it began science operations in July, 2008. We use a subset of over 300 GRBs localized by instruments such as Swift, the Fermi Large Area Telescope, INTEGRAL, and MAXI, or through triangulations from the InterPlanetary Network (IPN), to analyze the accuracy of GBM GRB localizations. We find that the reported statistical uncertainties on GBM localizations, which can be as small as 1 degree, underestimate the distance of the GBM positions to the true GRB locations and we attribute this to systematic uncertainties. The distribution of systematic uncertainties is well represented (68% confidence level) by a 3.7 degree Gaussian with a non-Gaussian tail that contains about 10% of GBM-detected GRBs and extends to approximately 14 degrees. A more complex model suggests that there is a dependence of the systematic uncertainty on the position of the GRB in spacecraft coordinates, with GRBs in the quadrants on the Y-axis better localized than those on the X-axis.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
-
SGR J1550-5418 bursts detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor during its most prolific activity
Authors:
A. J. van der Horst,
C. Kouveliotou,
N. M. Gorgone,
Y. Kaneko,
M. G. Baring,
S. Guiriec,
E. Gogus,
J. Granot,
A. L. Watts,
L. Lin,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
V. L. Chaplin,
M. H. Finger,
N. Gehrels,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
A. Goldstein,
D. Gruber,
A. K. Harding,
L. Kaper,
A. von Kienlin,
M. van der Klis,
S. McBreen,
J. Mcenery
, et al. (10 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We have performed detailed temporal and time-integrated spectral analysis of 286 bursts from SGR J1550-5418 detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in January 2009, resulting in the largest uniform sample of temporal and spectral properties of SGR J1550-5418 bursts. We have used the combination of broadband and high time-resolution data provided with GBM to perform statistical studie…
▽ More
We have performed detailed temporal and time-integrated spectral analysis of 286 bursts from SGR J1550-5418 detected with the Fermi Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) in January 2009, resulting in the largest uniform sample of temporal and spectral properties of SGR J1550-5418 bursts. We have used the combination of broadband and high time-resolution data provided with GBM to perform statistical studies for the source properties. We determine the durations, emission times, duty cycles and rise times for all bursts, and find that they are typical of SGR bursts. We explore various models in our spectral analysis, and conclude that the spectra of SGR J1550-5418 bursts in the 8-200 keV band are equally well described by optically thin thermal bremsstrahlung (OTTB), a power law with an exponential cutoff (Comptonized model), and two black-body functions (BB+BB). In the spectral fits with the Comptonized model we find a mean power-law index of -0.92, close to the OTTB index of -1. We show that there is an anti-correlation between the Comptonized Epeak and the burst fluence and average flux. For the BB+BB fits we find that the fluences and emission areas of the two blackbody functions are correlated. The low-temperature BB has an emission area comparable to the neutron star surface area, independent of the temperature, while the high-temperature blackbody has a much smaller area and shows an anti-correlation between emission area and temperature. We compare the properties of these bursts with bursts observed from other SGR sources during extreme activations, and discuss the implications of our results in the context of magnetar burst models.
△ Less
Submitted 28 February, 2012; v1 submitted 14 February, 2012;
originally announced February 2012.
-
Rest-frame properties of 32 gamma-ray bursts observed by the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor
Authors:
D. Gruber,
J. Greiner,
A. von Kienlin,
A. Rau,
M. S. Briggs,
V. Connaughton,
A. Goldstein,
A. J. van der Horst,
M. Nardini,
P. N. Bhat,
E. Bissaldi,
J. M. Burgess,
V. L. Chaplin,
R. Diehl,
G. J. Fishman,
G. Fitzpatrick,
S. Foley,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
S. Guiriec,
R. M. Kippen,
C. Kouveliotou,
L. Lin,
S. McBreen,
C. A. Meegan
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Aims: In this paper we study the main spectral and temporal properties of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed by Fermi/GBM. We investigate these key properties of GRBs in the rest-frame of the progenitor and test for possible intra-parameter correlations to better understand the intrinsic nature of these events. Methods: Our sample comprises 32 GRBs with measured redshift that were observed by GBM un…
▽ More
Aims: In this paper we study the main spectral and temporal properties of gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) observed by Fermi/GBM. We investigate these key properties of GRBs in the rest-frame of the progenitor and test for possible intra-parameter correlations to better understand the intrinsic nature of these events. Methods: Our sample comprises 32 GRBs with measured redshift that were observed by GBM until August 2010. 28 of them belong to the long-duration population and 4 events were classified as short/hard bursts. For all of these events we derive, where possible, the intrinsic peak energy in the $νF_ν$ spectrum (\eprest), the duration in the rest-frame, defined as the time in which 90% of the burst fluence was observed (\tninetyrest) and the isotropic equivalent bolometric energy (\eiso). Results: The distribution of \eprest has mean and median values of 1.1 MeV and 750 keV, respectively. A log-normal fit to the sample of long bursts peaks at ~800 keV. No high-\ep population is found but the distribution is biased against low \ep values. We find the lowest possible \ep that GBM can recover to be ~ 15 keV. The \tninetyrest distribution of long GRBs peaks at ~10 s. The distribution of \eiso has mean and median values of $8.9\times 10^{52}$ erg and $8.2 \times 10^{52}$ erg, respectively. We confirm the tight correlation between \eprest and \eiso (Amati relation) and the one between \eprest and the 1-s peak luminosity ($L_p$) (Yonetoku relation). Additionally, we observe a parameter reconstruction effect, i.e. the low-energy power law index $α$ gets softer when \ep is located at the lower end of the detector energy range. Moreover, we do not find any significant cosmic evolution of neither \eprest nor \tninetyrest.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2011; v1 submitted 28 April, 2011;
originally announced April 2011.
-
Fermi/GBM observations of the ultra-long GRB 091024: A burst with an optical flash
Authors:
D. Gruber,
T. Krühler,
S. Foley,
M. Nardini,
D. Burlon,
A. Rau,
E. Bissaldi,
A. von Kienlin,
S. McBreen,
J. Greiner,
P. N. Bhat,
M. S. Briggs,
J. M. Burgess,
V. L. Chaplin,
V. Connaughton,
R. Diehl,
G. J. Fishman,
M. H. Gibby,
M. M. Giles,
A. Goldstein,
S. Guiriec,
A. J. van der Horst,
R. M. Kippen,
C. Kouveliotou,
L. Lin
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we examine gamma-ray and optical data of GRB 091024, a gamma-ray burst (GRB) with an extremely long duration of T90~1020 s, as observed with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). We present spectral analysis of all three distinct emission episodes using data from Fermi/GBM. Because of the long nature of this event, many ground-based optical telescopes slewed to its location within…
▽ More
In this paper we examine gamma-ray and optical data of GRB 091024, a gamma-ray burst (GRB) with an extremely long duration of T90~1020 s, as observed with the Fermi Gamma-Ray Burst Monitor (GBM). We present spectral analysis of all three distinct emission episodes using data from Fermi/GBM. Because of the long nature of this event, many ground-based optical telescopes slewed to its location within a few minutes and thus were able to observe the GRB during its active period. We compare the optical and gamma-ray light curves. Furthermore, we estimate a lower limit on the bulk Lorentz factor from the variability and spectrum of the GBM light curve and compare it with that obtained from the peak time of the forward shock of the optical afterglow. From the spectral analysis we note that, despite its unusually long duration, this burst is similar to other long GRBs, i.e. there is spectral evolution (both the peak energy and the spectral index vary with time) and spectral lags are measured. We find that the optical light curve is highly anti-correlated to the prompt gamma-ray emission, with the optical emission reaching the maximum during an epoch of quiescence in the prompt emission. We interpret this behavior as the reverse shock (optical flash), expected in the internal-external shock model of GRB emission but observed only in a handful of GRBs so far. The lower limit on the initial Lorentz factor deduced from the variability time scale ($Γ_{min}=195_{-110}^+{90}$)is consistent within the error to the one obtained using the peak time of the forward shock ($Γ_0=120$) and is also consistent with Lorentz factors of other long GRBs.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2011;
originally announced January 2011.
