Showing 1–12 of 12 results for author: Etherington, A

Abell 1201: Detection of an Ultramassive Black Hole in a Strong Gravitational Lens

Authors: James. W. Nightingale, Russell J. Smith, Qiuhan He, Conor M. O'Riordan, Jacob A. Kegerreis, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Alastair C. Edge, Amy Etherington, Richard G. Hayes, Ash Kelly, John R. Lucey, Richard J. Massey Richard J. Massey

Abstract: Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are a key catalyst of galaxy formation and evolution, leading to an observed correlation between SMBH mass $M_{\rm BH}$ and host galaxy velocity dispersion $σ_{\rm e}$. Outside the local Universe, measurements of $M_{\rm BH}$ are usually only possible for SMBHs in an active state: limiting sample size and introducing selection biases. Gravitational lensing makes it… ▽ More Supermassive black holes (SMBHs) are a key catalyst of galaxy formation and evolution, leading to an observed correlation between SMBH mass $M_{\rm BH}$ and host galaxy velocity dispersion $σ_{\rm e}$. Outside the local Universe, measurements of $M_{\rm BH}$ are usually only possible for SMBHs in an active state: limiting sample size and introducing selection biases. Gravitational lensing makes it possible to measure the mass of non-active SMBHs. We present models of the $z=0.169$ galaxy-scale strong lens Abell~1201. A cD galaxy in a galaxy cluster, it has sufficient `external shear' that a magnified image of a $z = 0.451$ background galaxy is projected just $\sim 1$ kpc from the galaxy centre. Using multi-band Hubble Space Telescope imaging and the lens modeling software $\texttt{PyAutoLens}$ we reconstruct the distribution of mass along this line of sight. Bayesian model comparison favours a point mass with $M_{\rm BH} = 3.27 \pm 2.12\times10^{10}\,$M$_{\rm \odot}$ (3$σ$ confidence limit); an ultramassive black hole. One model gives a comparable Bayesian evidence without a SMBH, however we argue this model is nonphysical given its base assumptions. This model still provides an upper limit of $M_{\rm BH} \leq 5.3 \times 10^{10}\,$M$_{\rm \odot}$, because a SMBH above this mass deforms the lensed image $\sim 1$ kpc from Abell 1201's centre. This builds on previous work using central images to place upper limits on $M_{\rm BH}$, but is the first to also place a lower limit and without a central image being observed. The success of this method suggests that surveys during the next decade could measure thousands more SMBH masses, and any redshift evolution of the $M_{\rm BH}$--$σ_{\rm e}$ relation. Results are available at https://github.com/Jammy2211/autolens_abell_1201. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: Accepted in MNRAS, 27 pages, 22 figures

Strong gravitational lensing's 'external shear' is not shear

Authors: Amy Etherington, James W. Nightingale, Richard Massey, Sut-Ieng Tam, XiaoYue Cao, Anna Niemiec, Qiuhan He, Andrew Robertson, Ran Li, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Jose M. Diego, Carlos S. Frenk, Brenda L. Frye, David Harvey, Mathilde Jauzac, Anton M. Koekemoer, David J. Lagattuta, Marceau Limousin, Guillaume Mahler, Ellen Sirks, Charles L. Steinhardt

Abstract: The distribution of mass in galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses is often modelled as an elliptical power law plus 'external shear', which notionally accounts for neighbouring galaxies and cosmic shear. We show that it does not. Except in a handful of rare systems, the best-fit values of external shear do not correlate with independent measurements of shear: from weak lensing in 45 Hubble Spac… ▽ More The distribution of mass in galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses is often modelled as an elliptical power law plus 'external shear', which notionally accounts for neighbouring galaxies and cosmic shear. We show that it does not. Except in a handful of rare systems, the best-fit values of external shear do not correlate with independent measurements of shear: from weak lensing in 45 Hubble Space Telescope images, or in 50 mock images of lenses with complex distributions of mass. Instead, the best-fit shear is aligned with the major or minor axis of 88% of lens galaxies; and the amplitude of the external shear increases if that galaxy is disky. We conclude that 'external shear' attached to a power law model is not physically meaningful, but a fudge to compensate for lack of model complexity. Since it biases other model parameters that are interpreted as physically meaningful in several science analyses (e.g. measuring galaxy evolution, dark matter physics or cosmological parameters), we recommend that future studies of galaxy-scale strong lensing should employ more flexible mass models. △ Less

Submitted 17 November, 2023; v1 submitted 12 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Comments: 13 pages, 11 figures, submitted to MNRAS and Review Response Submitted

Scanning For Dark Matter Subhalos in Hubble Space Telescope Imaging of 54 Strong Lenses

Authors: James W. Nightingale, Qiuhan He, Xiaoyue Cao, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Amy Etherington, Carlos S. Frenk, Richard G. Hayes, Andrew Robertson, Shaun Cole, Samuel Lange, Ran Li, Richard Massey

Abstract: The cold dark matter (DM) model predicts that every galaxy contains thousands of DM subhalos; almost all other DM models include a physical process that smooths away the subhalos. The subhalos are invisible, but could be detected via strong gravitational lensing, if they lie on the line of sight to a multiply-imaged background source, and perturb its apparent shape. We present a predominantly auto… ▽ More The cold dark matter (DM) model predicts that every galaxy contains thousands of DM subhalos; almost all other DM models include a physical process that smooths away the subhalos. The subhalos are invisible, but could be detected via strong gravitational lensing, if they lie on the line of sight to a multiply-imaged background source, and perturb its apparent shape. We present a predominantly automated strong lens analysis framework, and scan for DM subhalos in Hubble Space Telescope imaging of 54 strong lenses. We identify five DM subhalo candidates, including two especially compelling candidates (one previously known in SLACS0946+1006) where a subhalo is favoured after all of our tests for systematics. We find that the detectability of subhalos depends upon the assumed parametric form for the lens galaxy's mass distribution, especially its degree of azimuthal freedom. Using separate components for dark matter and stellar mass reveals two DM subhalo candidates and removes four false-positives compared to the single power-law mass model that is common in the literature. We identify 45 lenses without substructures, the number of which is key to statistical tests able to rule out models of e.g. warm or self-interacting DM. Our full analysis results are available at https://github.com/Jammy2211/autolens_subhalo. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2023; v1 submitted 21 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: 25 Pages, 15 Figures

Beyond the bulge-halo conspiracy? Density profiles of Early-type galaxies from extended-source strong lensing

Authors: Amy Etherington, James W. Nightingale, Richard Massey, Andrew Robertson, XiaoYue Cao, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Carlos S. Frenk, Qiuhan He, David J. Lagattuta, Samuel Lange, Ran Li

Abstract: Observations suggest that the dark matter and stars in early-type galaxies `conspire' to produce a surprisingly simple distribution of total mass, $ρ(r)\proptoρ^{-γ}$, with $γ\approx2$. We measure the distribution of mass in 48 early-type galaxies that gravitationally lens a resolved background source. By fitting the source light in every pixel of images from the Hubble Space Telescope, we find a… ▽ More Observations suggest that the dark matter and stars in early-type galaxies `conspire' to produce a surprisingly simple distribution of total mass, $ρ(r)\proptoρ^{-γ}$, with $γ\approx2$. We measure the distribution of mass in 48 early-type galaxies that gravitationally lens a resolved background source. By fitting the source light in every pixel of images from the Hubble Space Telescope, we find a mean $\langleγ\rangle=2.075_{-0.024}^{+0.023}$ with intrinsic scatter between galaxies of $σ_γ=0.172^{+0.022}_{-0.032}$ for the overall sample. This is consistent with, and has similar precision to traditional techniques that employ spectroscopic observations to supplement lensing with mass estimates from stellar dynamics. Comparing measurements of $γ$ for individual lenses using both techniques, we find a statistically insignificant correlation of $-0.150^{+0.223}_{-0.217}$ between the two, indicating a lack of statistical power or deviations from a power-law density in certain lenses. At fixed surface mass density, we measure a redshift dependence, $\partial\langleγ\rangle/\partial z=0.345^{+0.322}_{-0.296}$, that is consistent with traditional techniques for the same sample of SLACS and GALLERY lenses. Interestingly, the consistency breaks down when we measure the dependence of $γ$ on the surface mass density of a lens galaxy. We argue that this is tentative evidence for an inflection point in the total-mass density profile at a few times the galaxy effective radius -- breaking the conspiracy. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2023; v1 submitted 8 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: 14 pages, 11 figures, 5 tables, submitted to MNRAS

Testing strong lensing subhalo detection with a cosmological simulation

Authors: Qiuhan He, James Nightingale, Andrew Robertson, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Carlos S. Frenk, Richard Massey, Ran Li, Nicola C. Amorisco, R. Benton Metcalf, Xiaoyue Cao, Amy Etherington

Abstract: Strong gravitational lensing offers a compelling test of the cold dark matter paradigm, as it allows for subhaloes with masses of $\sim10^{9}$ M$_\odot$ and below to be detected. We test commonly-used techniques for detecting subhaloes superposed in images of strongly lensed galaxies. For the lens we take a simulated galaxy in a $\sim10^{13}$ M$_\odot$ halo grown in a high-resolution cosmological… ▽ More Strong gravitational lensing offers a compelling test of the cold dark matter paradigm, as it allows for subhaloes with masses of $\sim10^{9}$ M$_\odot$ and below to be detected. We test commonly-used techniques for detecting subhaloes superposed in images of strongly lensed galaxies. For the lens we take a simulated galaxy in a $\sim10^{13}$ M$_\odot$ halo grown in a high-resolution cosmological hydrodynamical simulation, which we view from two different directions. Though the resolution is high, we note the simulated galaxy still has an artificial core which adds additional complexity to the baryon dominated region. To remove particle noise, we represent the projected galaxy mass distribution by a series of Gaussian profiles which precisely capture the features of the projected galaxy. We first model the lens mass as a (broken) power-law density profile and then search for small haloes. Of the two projections, one has a regular elliptical shape, while the other has distinct deviations from an elliptical shape. For the former, the broken power-law model gives no false positives and correctly recovers the mass of the superposed small halo, but for the latter we find false positives and the inferred halo mass is overestimated by $\sim4-5$ times. We then use a more complex model in which the lens mass is decomposed into stellar and dark matter components. In this case, we show that we can capture the simulated galaxy's complex projected structures and correctly infer the input small halo. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2022; v1 submitted 21 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: Accepted by MNRAS. Comments welcome!

Automated galaxy-galaxy strong lens modelling: no lens left behind

Authors: Amy Etherington, James W. Nightingale, Richard Massey, XiaoYue Cao, Andrew Robertson, Nicola C. Amorisco, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Shaun Cole, Carlos S. Frenk, Qiuhan He, Ran Li, Sut-Ieng Tam

Abstract: The distribution of dark and luminous matter can be mapped around galaxies that gravitationally lens background objects into arcs or Einstein rings. New surveys will soon observe hundreds of thousands of galaxy lenses, and current, labour-intensive analysis methods will not scale up to this challenge. We instead develop a fully automatic, Bayesian method which we use to fit a sample of 59 lenses i… ▽ More The distribution of dark and luminous matter can be mapped around galaxies that gravitationally lens background objects into arcs or Einstein rings. New surveys will soon observe hundreds of thousands of galaxy lenses, and current, labour-intensive analysis methods will not scale up to this challenge. We instead develop a fully automatic, Bayesian method which we use to fit a sample of 59 lenses imaged by the Hubble Space Telescope in uniform conditions. We set out to \textit{leave no lens behind} and focus on ways in which automated fits fail in a small handful of lenses, describing adjustments to the pipeline that allows us to infer accurate lens models. Our pipeline ultimately fits {\em all} 59 lenses in our sample, with a high success rate key because catastrophic outliers would bias large samples with small statistical errors. Machine Learning techniques might further improve the two most difficult steps: subtracting foreground lens light and initialising a first, approximate lens model. After that, increasing model complexity is straightforward. We find a mean $\sim1\%$ measurement precision on the measurement of the Einstein radius across the lens sample which {\em does not degrade with redshift} up to at least $z=0.7$ -- in stark contrast to other techniques used to study galaxy evolution, like stellar dynamics. Our \texttt{PyAutoLens} software is open source, and is also installed in the Science Data Centres of the ESA Euclid mission. △ Less

Submitted 12 January, 2023; v1 submitted 18 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: 23 pages, 20 figures, 5 tables. Submitted to MNRAS

Systematic errors induced by the elliptical power-law model in galaxy-galaxy strong lens modeling

Authors: Xiaoyue Cao, Ran Li, J. W. Nightingale, Richard Massey, Andrew Robertson, Carlos S. Frenk, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Nicola C. Amorisco, Qiuhan He, Amy Etherington, Shaun Cole, Kai Zhu

Abstract: The elliptical power-law (EPL) model of the mass in a galaxy is widely used in strong gravitational lensing analyses. However, the distribution of mass in real galaxies is more complex. We quantify the biases due to this model mismatch by simulating and then analysing mock {\it Hubble Space Telescope} imaging of lenses with mass distributions inferred from SDSS-MaNGA stellar dynamics data. We find… ▽ More The elliptical power-law (EPL) model of the mass in a galaxy is widely used in strong gravitational lensing analyses. However, the distribution of mass in real galaxies is more complex. We quantify the biases due to this model mismatch by simulating and then analysing mock {\it Hubble Space Telescope} imaging of lenses with mass distributions inferred from SDSS-MaNGA stellar dynamics data. We find accurate recovery of source galaxy morphology, except for a slight tendency to infer sources to be more compact than their true size. The Einstein radius of the lens is also robustly recovered with 0.1% accuracy, as is the global density slope, with 2.5% relative systematic error, compared to the 3.4% intrinsic dispersion. However, asymmetry in real lenses also leads to a spurious fitted `external shear' with typical strength, $γ_{\rm ext}=0.015$. Furthermore, time delays inferred from lens modelling without measurements of stellar dynamics are typically underestimated by $\sim$5%. Using such measurements from a sub-sample of 37 lenses would bias measurements of the Hubble constant $H_0$ by $\sim$9%. Although this work is based on a particular set of MaNGA galaxies, and the specific value of the detected biases may change for another set of strong lenses, our results strongly suggest the next generation cosmography needs to use more complex lens mass models. △ Less

Submitted 21 November, 2021; v1 submitted 27 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Accepted by RAA; Fix a few typos, add some references

Galaxy-galaxy strong lens perturbations: line-of-sight haloes versus lens subhaloes

Authors: Qiuhan He, Ran Li, Carlos S. Frenk, James Nightingale, Shaun Cole, Nicola C. Amorisco, Richard Massey, Andrew Robertson, Amy Etherington, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Xiaoyue Cao

Abstract: We rederive the number density of intervening line-of-sight haloes relative to lens subhaloes in galaxy-galaxy strong lensing observations, where these perturbers can generate detectable image fluctuations. Previous studies have calculated the detection limit of a line-of-sight small-mass dark halo by comparing the lensing deflection angles it would cause, to those caused by a subhalo within the l… ▽ More We rederive the number density of intervening line-of-sight haloes relative to lens subhaloes in galaxy-galaxy strong lensing observations, where these perturbers can generate detectable image fluctuations. Previous studies have calculated the detection limit of a line-of-sight small-mass dark halo by comparing the lensing deflection angles it would cause, to those caused by a subhalo within the lens. However, this overly simplifies the difference in observational consequences between a subhalo and a line-of-sight halo. Furthermore, it does not take into account degeneracies between an extra subhalo and the uncertain properties of the main lens. More in keeping with analyses of real-world observations, we regard a line-of-sight halo as detectable only if adding it to a smooth model generates a statistically significant improvement in the reconstructed image. We find that the number density of detectable line-of-sight perturbers has been overestimated by as much as a factor of two in the previous literature. For typical lensing geometries and configurations, very deep imaging is sensitive to twice as many line-of-sight perturbers as subhaloes, but moderate depth imaging is sensitive to only slightly more line-of-sight perturbers than subhaloes. △ Less

Submitted 26 September, 2022; v1 submitted 9 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: Accepted by MNRAS. Comments welcome

Halo concentration strengthens dark matter constraints in galaxy-galaxy strong lensing analyses

Authors: Nicola C. Amorisco, James Nightingale, Qiuhan He, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Xiaoyue Cao, Shaun Cole, Amy Etherington, Carlos S. Frenk, Ran Li, Richard Massey, Andrew Robertson

Abstract: A defining prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model is the existence of a very large population of low-mass haloes. This population is absent in models in which the dark matter particle is warm (WDM). These alternatives can, in principle, be distinguished observationally because halos along the line-of-sight can perturb galaxy-galaxy strong gravitational lenses. Furthermore, the… ▽ More A defining prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) cosmological model is the existence of a very large population of low-mass haloes. This population is absent in models in which the dark matter particle is warm (WDM). These alternatives can, in principle, be distinguished observationally because halos along the line-of-sight can perturb galaxy-galaxy strong gravitational lenses. Furthermore, the WDM particle mass could be deduced because the cut-off in their halo mass function depends on the mass of the particle. We systematically explore the detectability of low-mass haloes in WDM models by simulating and fitting mock lensed images. Contrary to previous studies, we find that halos are harder to detect when they are either behind or in front of the lens. Furthermore, we find that the perturbing effect of haloes increases with their concentration: detectable haloes are systematically high-concentration haloes, and accounting for the scatter in the mass-concentration relation boosts the expected number of detections by as much as an order of magnitude. Haloes have lower concentration for lower particle masses and this further suppresses the number of detectable haloes beyond the reduction arising from the lower halo abundances alone. Taking these effects into account can make lensing constraints on the value of the mass function cut-off at least an order of magnitude more stringent than previously appreciated. △ Less

Submitted 31 August, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

Comments: MNRAS submitted. Comments welcome

PyAutoLens: Open-Source Strong Gravitational Lensing

Authors: James. W. Nightingale, Richard G. Hayes, Ashley Kelly, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Amy Etherington, Qiuhan He, Nan Li, XiaoYue Cao, Jonathan Frawley, Shaun Cole, Andrea Enia, Carlos S. Frenk, David R. Harvey, Ran Li, Richard J. Massey, Mattia Negrello, Andrew Robertson

Abstract: Strong gravitational lensing, which can make a background source galaxy appears multiple times due to its light rays being deflected by the mass of one or more foreground lens galaxies, provides astronomers with a powerful tool to study dark matter, cosmology and the most distant Universe. PyAutoLens is an open-source Python 3.6+ package for strong gravitational lensing, with core features includi… ▽ More Strong gravitational lensing, which can make a background source galaxy appears multiple times due to its light rays being deflected by the mass of one or more foreground lens galaxies, provides astronomers with a powerful tool to study dark matter, cosmology and the most distant Universe. PyAutoLens is an open-source Python 3.6+ package for strong gravitational lensing, with core features including fully automated strong lens modeling of galaxies and galaxy clusters, support for direct imaging and interferometer datasets and comprehensive tools for simulating samples of strong lenses. The API allows users to perform ray-tracing by using analytic light and mass profiles to build strong lens systems. Accompanying PyAutoLens is the autolens workspace (see https://github.com/Jammy2211/autolens_workspace), which includes example scripts, lens datasets and the HowToLens lectures in Jupyter notebook format which introduce non experts to strong lensing using PyAutoLens. Readers can try PyAutoLens right now by going to the introduction Jupyter notebook on Binder (see https://mybinder.org/v2/gh/Jammy2211/autolens_workspace/master) or checkout the readthedocs (see https://pyautolens.readthedocs.io/en/latest/) for a complete overview of PyAutoLens's features. △ Less

Submitted 2 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Comments: 2 pages, 1 figure

Journal ref: Journal of Open Source Software, 6(58), 2525 (2021)

A forward-modelling method to infer the dark matter particle mass from strong gravitational lenses

Authors: Qiuhan He, Andrew Robertson, James Nightingale, Shaun Cole, Carlos S. Frenk, Richard Massey, Aristeidis Amvrosiadis, Ran Li, Xiaoyue Cao, Amy Etherington

Abstract: A fundamental prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) model of structure formation is the existence of a vast population of dark matter haloes extending to subsolar masses. By contrast, other dark matter models, such as a warm thermal relic (WDM), predict a cutoff in the mass function at a mass which, for popular models, lies approximately between $10^7$ and $10^{10}~{\rm M}_\odot$. We use mock o… ▽ More A fundamental prediction of the cold dark matter (CDM) model of structure formation is the existence of a vast population of dark matter haloes extending to subsolar masses. By contrast, other dark matter models, such as a warm thermal relic (WDM), predict a cutoff in the mass function at a mass which, for popular models, lies approximately between $10^7$ and $10^{10}~{\rm M}_\odot$. We use mock observations to demonstrate the viability of a forward modelling approach to extract information about low-mass dark haloes lying along the line-of-sight to galaxy-galaxy strong lenses. This can be used to constrain the mass of a thermal relic dark matter particle, $m_\mathrm{DM}$. With 50 strong lenses at Hubble Space Telescope resolution and a maximum pixel signal-to-noise ratio of $\sim50$, the expected median 2$σ$ constraint for a CDM-like model (with a halo mass cutoff at $10^{7}~{\rm M}_\odot$) is $m_\mathrm{DM} > 4.10 \, \mathrm{keV}$ (50% chance of constraining $m_{\rm DM}$ to be better than 4.10 keV). If, however, the dark matter is a warm particle of $m_\mathrm{DM}=2.2 \, \mathrm{keV}$, our 'Approximate Bayesian Computation' method would result in a median estimate of $m_\mathrm{DM}$ between 1.43 and 3.21 keV. Our method can be extended to the large samples of strong lenses that will be observed by future telescopes, and could potentially rule out the standard CDM model of cosmogony. To aid future survey design, we quantify how these constraints will depend on data quality (spatial resolution and integration time) as well as on the lensing geometry (source and lens redshifts). △ Less

Submitted 9 February, 2022; v1 submitted 25 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: Accepted by MNRAS. Comments welcome

Galaxy structure with strong gravitational lensing: decomposing the internal mass distribution of massive elliptical galaxies

Authors: James. W. Nightingale, Richard J. Massey, David R. Harvey, Andrew P. Cooper, Amy Etherington, Sut-Ieng Tam, Richard G. Hayes

Abstract: We investigate how strong gravitational lensing can test contemporary models of massive elliptical (ME) galaxy formation, by combining a traditional decomposition of their visible stellar distribution with a lensing analysis of their mass distribution. As a proof of concept, we study a sample of three ME lenses, observing that all are composed of two distinct baryonic structures, a `red' central b… ▽ More We investigate how strong gravitational lensing can test contemporary models of massive elliptical (ME) galaxy formation, by combining a traditional decomposition of their visible stellar distribution with a lensing analysis of their mass distribution. As a proof of concept, we study a sample of three ME lenses, observing that all are composed of two distinct baryonic structures, a `red' central bulge surrounded by an extended envelope of stellar material. Whilst these two components look photometrically similar, their distinct lensing effects permit a clean decomposition of their mass structure. This allows us to infer two key pieces of information about each lens galaxy: (i) the stellar mass distribution (without invoking stellar populations models) and (ii) the inner dark matter halo mass. We argue that these two measurements are crucial to testing models of ME formation, as the stellar mass profile provides a diagnostic of baryonic accretion and feedback whilst the dark matter mass places each galaxy in the context of LCDM large scale structure formation. We also detect large rotational offsets between the two stellar components and a lopsidedness in their outer mass distributions, which hold further information on the evolution of each ME. Finally, we discuss how this approach can be extended to galaxies of all Hubble types and what implication our results have for studies of strong gravitational lensing. △ Less

Submitted 12 July, 2019; v1 submitted 23 January, 2019; originally announced January 2019.

Comments: 19 pages, 4 figures. source code: https://github.com/Jammy2211/PyAutoLens