Showing 1–4 of 4 results for author: Eiger, O

Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Mis-centering calibration and X-ray-richness scaling relations in redMaPPer clusters

Authors: P. Kelly, J. Jobel, O. Eiger, A. Abd, T. E. Jeltema, P. Giles, D. L. Hollowood, R. D. Wilkinson, D. J. Turner, S. Bhargava, S. Everett, A. Farahi, A. K. Romer, E. S. Rykoff, F. Wang, S. Bocquet, D. Cross, R. Faridjoo, J. Franco, G. Gardner, M. Kwiecien, D. Laubner, A. McDaniel, J. H. O'Donnell, L. Sanchez , et al. (54 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$)… ▽ More We use Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) clusters with archival X-ray data from XMM-Newton and Chandra to assess the centering performance of the redMaPPer cluster finder and to measure key richness observable scaling relations. In terms of centering, we find that 10-20% of redMaPPer clusters are miscentered with no significant difference in bins of low versus high richness ($20<λ<40$ and $λ>40$) or redshift ($0.2<z<0.4$ and $0.4 <z < 0.65$). We also investigate the richness bias induced by miscentering. The dominant reasons for miscentering include masked or missing data and the presence of other bright galaxies in the cluster; for half of the miscentered clusters the correct central was one of the other possible centrals identified by redMaPPer, while for $\sim 40$% of miscentered clusters the correct central is not a redMaPPer member with most of these cases due to masking. In addition, we fit the scaling relations between X-ray temperature and richness and between X-ray luminosity and richness. We find a T$_X$-$λ$ scatter of $0.21 \pm 0.01$. While the scatter in T$_X$-$λ$ is consistent in bins of redshift, we do find modestly different slopes with high-redshift clusters displaying a somewhat shallower relation. Splitting based on richness, we find a marginally larger scatter for our lowest richness bin, $20 < λ< 40$. The X-ray properties of detected, serendipitous clusters are generally consistent with those for targeted clusters, but the depth of the X-ray data for undetected clusters is insufficient to judge whether they are X-ray underluminous in all but one case. △ Less

Submitted 19 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Cool Cores in Clusters of Galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey

Authors: K. Graham, J. O'Donnell, M. M. Silverstein, O. Eiger, T. E. Jeltema, D. L. Hollowood, D. Cross, S. Everett, P. Giles, J. Jobel, D. Laubner, A. McDaniel, A. K. Romer, A. Swart, M. Aguena, S. Allam, O. Alves, D. Brooks, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, M. Costanzi, L. N. da Costa, M. E. S. Pereira, J. De Vicente, S. Desai , et al. (32 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We search for the presence of cool cores in optically-selected galaxy clusters from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and investigate their prevalence as a function of redshift and cluster richness. Clusters were selected from the redMaPPer analysis of three years of DES observations that have archival Chandra X-ray observations, giving a sample of 99 clusters with a redshift range of… ▽ More We search for the presence of cool cores in optically-selected galaxy clusters from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and investigate their prevalence as a function of redshift and cluster richness. Clusters were selected from the redMaPPer analysis of three years of DES observations that have archival Chandra X-ray observations, giving a sample of 99 clusters with a redshift range of $0.11 < z < 0.87$ and a richness range of $25 < λ< 207$. Using the X-ray data, the core temperature was compared to the outer temperature to identify clusters where the core temperature is a factor of 0.7 or less than the outer temperature. We found a cool core fraction of approximately 20% with no significant trend in the cool core fraction with either redshift or richness. △ Less

Submitted 3 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: shortened version accepted to RNAAS

Examining the Self-Interaction of Dark Matter through Central Cluster Galaxy Offsets

Authors: Dane Cross, Gray Thoron, Tesla Jeltema, Allison Swart, Devon Hollowood, Susmita Adhikari, Sebastian Bocquet, Orion Eiger, Spencer Everett, Jose Jobel

Abstract: While collisionless cold dark matter models have been largely successful in explaining a wide range of observational data, some tensions still exist, and it remains possible that dark matter possesses a non-negligible level of self interactions. In this paper, we investigate a possible observable consequence of self-interacting dark matter: offsets between the central galaxy and the center of mass… ▽ More While collisionless cold dark matter models have been largely successful in explaining a wide range of observational data, some tensions still exist, and it remains possible that dark matter possesses a non-negligible level of self interactions. In this paper, we investigate a possible observable consequence of self-interacting dark matter: offsets between the central galaxy and the center of mass of its parent halo. We examine 23 relaxed galaxy clusters in a redshift range of 0.1 to 0.3 drawn from clusters in the Dark Energy Survey and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey which have archival Chandra X-ray data of sufficient depth for center and relaxation determination. We find that most clusters in our sample show non-zero offsets between the X-ray center, taken to be the centroid within the cluster core, and the central galaxy position. All of the measured offsets are larger, typically by an order of magnitude, than the uncertainty in the X-ray position due to Poisson noise. In all but six clusters, the measured offsets are also larger than the estimated, combined astrometric uncertainties in the X-ray and optical positions. A more conservative cut on concentration to select relaxed clusters marginally reduces but does not eliminate the observed offset. With our more conservative sample, we find an estimated mean X-ray to central galaxy offset of $μ= 5.5 \pm 1.0$ kpc. Comparing to recent simulations, this distribution of offsets is consistent with some level of dark matter self interaction, though further simulation work is needed to place constraints. △ Less

Submitted 20 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: 7 pages, 1 figure, 1 table

Velocity Dispersions of Clusters in the Dark Energy Survey Y3 redMaPPer Catalog

Authors: V. Wetzell, T. E. Jeltema, B. Hegland, S. Everett, P. A. Giles, R. Wilkinson, A. Farahi, M. Costanzi, D. L. Hollowood, E. Upsdell, A. Saro, J. Myles, A. Bermeo, S. Bhargava, C. A. Collins, D. Cross, O. Eiger, G. Gardner, M. Hilton, J. Jobel, P. Kelly, D. Laubner, A. R. Liddle, R. G. Mann, V. Martinez , et al. (74 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlation… ▽ More We measure the velocity dispersions of clusters of galaxies selected by the redMaPPer algorithm in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), allowing us to probe cluster selection and richness estimation, $λ$, in light of cluster dynamics. Our sample consists of 126 clusters with sufficient spectroscopy for individual velocity dispersion estimates. We examine the correlations between cluster velocity dispersion, richness, X-ray temperature and luminosity as well as central galaxy velocity offsets. The velocity dispersion-richness relation exhibits a bimodal distribution. The majority of clusters follow scaling relations between velocity dispersion, richness, and X-ray properties similar to those found for previous samples; however, there is a significant population of clusters with velocity dispersions which are high for their richness. These clusters account for roughly 22\% of the $λ< 70$ systems in our sample, but more than half (55\%) of $λ< 70$ clusters at $z>0.5$. A couple of these systems are hot and X-ray bright as expected for massive clusters with richnesses that appear to have been underestimated, but most appear to have high velocity dispersions for their X-ray properties likely due to line-of-sight structure. These results suggest that projection effects contribute significantly to redMaPPer selection, particularly at higher redshifts and lower richnesses. The redMaPPer determined richnesses for the velocity dispersion outliers are consistent with their X-ray properties, but several are X-ray undetected and deeper data is needed to understand their nature. △ Less

Submitted 9 June, 2022; v1 submitted 15 July, 2021; originally announced July 2021.

Comments: 22 pages, accepted to MNRAS