-
Spin evolution of Venus-like planets subjected to gravitational and thermal tides
Authors:
Alexandre Revol,
Émeline Bolmont,
Gabriel Tobie,
Caroline Dumoulin,
Yann Musseau,
Stéphane Mathis,
Antoine Strugarek,
Allan-Sacha Brun
Abstract:
The arrival of powerful instruments will provide valuable data for the characterization of rocky exoplanets. It is then crucial to accurately model the dynamical state of exoplanets. Rocky planets with sufficiently large orbits should have non-zero eccentricities and/or obliquities. Realistic models of tides for rocky planets can allow for higher spin states than the synchronization state in the p…
▽ More
The arrival of powerful instruments will provide valuable data for the characterization of rocky exoplanets. It is then crucial to accurately model the dynamical state of exoplanets. Rocky planets with sufficiently large orbits should have non-zero eccentricities and/or obliquities. Realistic models of tides for rocky planets can allow for higher spin states than the synchronization state in the presence of eccentricities or obliquities. This work explores the secular evolution of a star-planet system under tidal interactions, both gravitational and thermal, induced respectively by the quadrupolar component of the gravitational potential and the irradiation of the planet's surface. We use the formalism of Kaula associated with an Andrade rheology to model a relevant response of a rocky planet to gravitational tides and a prescription of thermal tides fitted for Venus to model the response of the atmosphere to the thermal tides. We implemented the general secular evolution equations of tidal interactions in the secular code ESPEM (French acronym for Evolution of Planetary System and Magnetism). We show the possible spin-orbit evolution and resonances for eccentric orbits and explore the possible spin orbit resonances raised by the obliquity of the planet. Our simulations have shown that the secular evolution of the spin and obliquity can lead to the retrograde spin of the Venus-like planet if the system starts from a high spin obliquity, in agreement to previous studies. Taking into account the luminosity evolution of the Sun changes the picture. We find that the planet never reaches the equilibrium: the timescale of rotation evolution is longer than the luminosity variation timescale, which suggests that Venus may never reach a spin equilibrium state but may still evolve.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2023; v1 submitted 28 February, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Solid tidal friction in multi-layer planets: Application to Earth, Venus, a Super Earth and the TRAPPIST-1 planets. Can a multi-layer planet be approximated as a homogeneous planet?
Authors:
Emeline Bolmont,
Sylvain N. Breton,
Gabriel Tobie,
Caroline Dumoulin,
Stéphane Mathis,
Olivier Grasset
Abstract:
With the discovery of TRAPPIST-1 and its seven planets within 0.06 au, the correct treatment of tidal interactions is becoming necessary. The eccentricity, rotation, and obliquity of the planets of TRAPPIST-1 are indeed the result of tidal evolution over the lifetime of the system. Tidal interactions can also lead to tidal heating in the interior of the planets, which can then be responsible for v…
▽ More
With the discovery of TRAPPIST-1 and its seven planets within 0.06 au, the correct treatment of tidal interactions is becoming necessary. The eccentricity, rotation, and obliquity of the planets of TRAPPIST-1 are indeed the result of tidal evolution over the lifetime of the system. Tidal interactions can also lead to tidal heating in the interior of the planets, which can then be responsible for volcanism and/or surface deformation. In the majority of studies to estimate the rotation of close-in planets or their tidal heating, the planets are considered as homogeneous bodies and their rheology is often taken to be a Maxwell rheology.
We investigate here the impact of considering a multi-layer structure and an Andrade rheology on the way planets dissipate tidal energy as a function of the excitation frequency. We use an internal structure model, which provides the radial profile of structural and rheological quantities to compute the tidal response of multi-layer bodies. We then compare the outcome to the dissipation of a homogeneous planet.
We find that for purely rocky bodies, it is possible to approximate the response of a multi-layer planet by that of a homogeneous planet. However, using average profiles of shear modulus and viscosity to compute the homogeneous planet response leads to an overestimation of the averaged dissipation. We provide fitted values of shear modulus and viscosity to be able to reproduce the response of various types of rocky planets. However, we find that if the planet has an icy layer, its tidal response can no longer be approximated by a homogeneous body because of the very different properties of the icy layers, which lead to a second dissipation peak at higher frequencies. We also compute the tidal heating profiles for the outer TRAPPIST-1 planets (e to h).
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
EnVision: understanding why our most Earth-like neighbour is so different
Authors:
Richard Ghail,
Colin Wilson,
Thomas Widemann,
Lorenzo Bruzzone,
Caroline Dumoulin,
Jörn Helbert,
Robbie Herrick,
Emmanuel Marcq,
Philippa Mason,
Pascal Rosenblatt,
Ann Carine Vandaele,
Louis-Jerome Burtz
Abstract:
This document is the EnVision Venus orbiter proposal, submitted in October 2016 in response to ESA's M5 call for Medium-size missions for its Science Programme, for launch in 2029.
Why are the terrestrial planets so different? Venus should be the most Earth-like of all our planetary neighbours: its size, bulk composition and distance from the Sun are very similar to those of Earth. Its original…
▽ More
This document is the EnVision Venus orbiter proposal, submitted in October 2016 in response to ESA's M5 call for Medium-size missions for its Science Programme, for launch in 2029.
Why are the terrestrial planets so different? Venus should be the most Earth-like of all our planetary neighbours: its size, bulk composition and distance from the Sun are very similar to those of Earth. Its original atmosphere was probably similar to that of early Earth, with abundant water that would have been liquid under the young sun's fainter output. Even today, with its global cloud cover, the surface of Venus receives less solar energy than does Earth, so why did a moderate climate ensue here but a catastrophic runaway greenhouse on Venus? How and why did it all go wrong for Venus? What lessons can be learned about the life story of terrestrial planets in general, in this era of discovery of Earth-like exoplanets? Were the radically different evolutionary paths of Earth and Venus driven solely by distance from the Sun, or do internal dynamics, geological activity, volcanic outgassing and weathering also play an important part?
Following the primarily atmospheric focus of Venus Express, we propose a new Venus orbiter named EnVision, to focus on Venus' geology and geochemical cycles, seeking evidence for present and past activity. The payload comprises a state-of-the-art S-band radar which will be able to return imagery at spatial resolutions of 1 - 30 m, and capable of measuring cm-scale deformation; this is complemented by subsurface radar, IR and UV spectrometers to map volcanic gases, and by geodetic investigations.
△ Less
Submitted 27 March, 2017;
originally announced March 2017.
