Overcoming Confusion Noise with Hyperspectral Imaging from PRIMAger
Authors:
James M. S. Donnellan,
Seb J. Oliver,
Matthieu Bethermin,
Longji Bing,
Alberto Bolatto,
Charles M. Bradford,
Denis Burgarella,
Laure Ciesla,
Jason Glenn,
Alexandra Pope,
Stephen Serjeant,
Raphael Shirley,
JD T. Smith,
Chris Sorrell
Abstract:
The PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA) concept aims to perform mapping with spectral coverage and sensitivities inaccessible to previous FIR space telescopes. PRIMA's imaging instrument, PRIMAger, provides unique hyperspectral imaging simultaneously covering 25-235 $μ$m. We synthesise images representing a deep, 1500 hr deg$^{-2}$ PRIMAger survey, with realistic instrumental and c…
▽ More
The PRobe far-Infrared Mission for Astrophysics (PRIMA) concept aims to perform mapping with spectral coverage and sensitivities inaccessible to previous FIR space telescopes. PRIMA's imaging instrument, PRIMAger, provides unique hyperspectral imaging simultaneously covering 25-235 $μ$m. We synthesise images representing a deep, 1500 hr deg$^{-2}$ PRIMAger survey, with realistic instrumental and confusion noise. We demonstrate that we can construct catalogues of galaxies with a high purity ($>95$ per cent) at a source density of 42k deg$^{-2}$ using PRIMAger data alone. Using the XID+ deblending tool we show that we measure fluxes with an accuracy better than 20 per cent to flux levels of 0.16, 0.80, 9.7 and 15 mJy at 47.4, 79.7, 172, 235 $μ$m respectively. These are a factor of $\sim$2 and $\sim$3 fainter than the classical confusion limits for 72-96 $μ$m and 126-235 $μ$m, respectively. At $1.5 \leq z \leq 2$, we detect and accurately measure fluxes in 8-10 of the 10 channels covering 47-235 $μ$m for sources with $2 \leq$ log(SFR) $\leq 2.5$, a 0.5 dex improvement on what might be expected from the classical confusion limit. Recognising that PRIMager will operate in a context where high quality data will be available at other wavelengths, we investigate the benefits of introducing additional prior information. We show that by introducing even weak prior flux information when employing a higher source density catalogue (more than one source per beam) we can obtain accurate fluxes an order of magnitude below the classical confusion limit for 96-235 $μ$m.
△ Less
Submitted 10 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
First Light And Reionisation Epoch Simulations (FLARES) XI: [OIII] emitting galaxies at $5<z<10$
Authors:
Stephen M. Wilkins,
Christopher C. Lovell,
Aswin P. Vijayan,
Dimitrios Irodotou,
Nathan J. Adams,
William J. Roper,
Joseph Caruana,
Jorryt Matthee,
Louise T. C. Seeyave,
Christopher J. Conselice,
Pablo G. Pérez-González,
Jack C. Turner,
James M. S. Donnellan
Abstract:
JWST has now made it possible to probe the rest-frame optical line emission of high-redshift galaxies extending to z~9, and potentially beyond. To aid in the interpretation of these emerging constraints, in this work we explore predictions for [OIII] emission in high-redshift galaxies using the First Light and Reionisation Epoch Simulations (FLARES). We produce predictions for the [OIII] luminosit…
▽ More
JWST has now made it possible to probe the rest-frame optical line emission of high-redshift galaxies extending to z~9, and potentially beyond. To aid in the interpretation of these emerging constraints, in this work we explore predictions for [OIII] emission in high-redshift galaxies using the First Light and Reionisation Epoch Simulations (FLARES). We produce predictions for the [OIII] luminosity function, its correlation with the UV luminosity, and the distribution of equivalent widths (EWs). We also explore how the [OIII] EW correlates with physical properties including specific star formation rate, metallicity, and dust attenuation. Our predictions are largely consistent with recent observational constraints on the luminosity function, average equivalent widths, and line ratios. However, they fail to reproduce the observed tail of high-EW sources and the number density of extreme line emitters. Possibilities to explain these discrepancies include an additional source of ionising photons and/or greater stochasticity in star formation in the model or photometric scatter and/or bias in the observations. With JWST now rapidly building larger samples and a wider range of emission lines the answer to this remaining discrepancy should be available imminently.
△ Less
Submitted 14 April, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
