Women in academia: a warning on selection bias in gender studies from the astronomical perspective
Authors:
M. L. L. Dantas,
E. Cameron,
Rafael S. de Souza,
A. R. da Silva,
A. L. Chies-Santos,
C. Heneka,
P. R. T. Coelho,
A. Ederoclite,
I. S. Beloto,
V. Branco,
Morgan S. Camargo,
V. M. Carvalho de Oliveira,
C. de Sá-Freitas,
G. Gonçalves,
T. A. Pacheco,
Isabel Rebollido
Abstract:
The recent paper by AlShebli et al. (2020) investigates the impact of mentorship in young scientists. Among their conclusions, they state that female protégés benefit more from male than female mentorship. We herein expose a critical flaw in their methodological design that is a common issue in Astronomy, namely "selection biases". An effect that if not treated properly may lead to unwarranted cau…
▽ More
The recent paper by AlShebli et al. (2020) investigates the impact of mentorship in young scientists. Among their conclusions, they state that female protégés benefit more from male than female mentorship. We herein expose a critical flaw in their methodological design that is a common issue in Astronomy, namely "selection biases". An effect that if not treated properly may lead to unwarranted causality claims. In their analysis, selection biases seem to be present in the response rate of their survey (8.35%), the choice of database, success criterion, and the overlook of the numerous drawbacks female researchers face in academia. We discuss these issues and their implications -- one of them being the potential increase in obstacles for women in academia. Finally, we reinforce the dangers of not considering selection bias effects in studies aimed at retrieving causal relations.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
