-
Impact of Point Spread Function Higher Moments Error on Weak Gravitational Lensing II: A Comprehensive Study
Authors:
Tianqing Zhang,
Husni Almoubayyed,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Joshua E. Meyers,
Mike Jarvis,
Arun Kannawadi,
Morgan A. Schmitz,
Axel Guinot,
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
Weak gravitational lensing, or weak lensing, is one of the most powerful probes for dark matter and dark energy science, although it faces increasing challenges in controlling systematic uncertainties as \edit{the statistical errors become smaller}. The Point Spread Function (PSF) needs to be precisely modeled to avoid systematic error on the weak lensing measurements. The weak lensing biases indu…
▽ More
Weak gravitational lensing, or weak lensing, is one of the most powerful probes for dark matter and dark energy science, although it faces increasing challenges in controlling systematic uncertainties as \edit{the statistical errors become smaller}. The Point Spread Function (PSF) needs to be precisely modeled to avoid systematic error on the weak lensing measurements. The weak lensing biases induced by errors in the PSF model second moments, i.e., its size and shape, are well-studied. However, Zhang et al. (2021) showed that errors in the higher moments of the PSF may also be a significant source of systematics for upcoming weak lensing surveys. Therefore, the goal of this work is to comprehensively investigate the modeling quality of PSF moments from the $3^{\text{rd}}$ to $6^{\text{th}}$ order, and estimate their impact on cosmological parameter inference. We propagate the \textsc{PSFEx} higher moments modeling error in the HSC survey dataset to the weak lensing \edit{shear-shear correlation functions} and their cosmological analyses. We find that the overall multiplicative shear bias associated with errors in PSF higher moments can cause a $\sim 0.1 σ$ shift on the cosmological parameters for LSST Y10. PSF higher moment errors also cause additive biases in the weak lensing shear, which, if not accounted for in the cosmological parameter analysis, can induce cosmological parameter biases comparable to their $1σ$ uncertainties for LSST Y10. We compare the \textsc{PSFEx} model with PSF in Full FOV (\textsc{Piff}), and find similar performance in modeling the PSF higher moments. We conclude that PSF higher moment errors of the future PSF models should be reduced from those in current methods to avoid a need to explicitly model these effects in the weak lensing analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2023; v1 submitted 16 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
The Impact of Observing Strategy on Cosmological Constraints with LSST
Authors:
Michelle Lochner,
Dan Scolnic,
Husni Almoubayyed,
Timo Anguita,
Humna Awan,
Eric Gawiser,
Satya Gontcho A Gontcho,
Philippe Gris,
Simon Huber,
Saurabh W. Jha,
R. Lynne Jones,
Alex G. Kim,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Phil Marshall,
Tanja Petrushevska,
Nicolas Regnault,
Christian N. Setzer,
Sherry H. Suyu,
Peter Yoachim,
Rahul Biswas,
Tristan Blaineau,
Isobel Hook,
Marc Moniez,
Eric Neilsen,
Hiranya Peiris
, et al. (2 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The generation-defining Vera C. Rubin Observatory will make state-of-the-art measurements of both the static and transient universe through its Legacy Survey for Space and Time (LSST). With such capabilities, it is immensely challenging to optimize the LSST observing strategy across the survey's wide range of science drivers. Many aspects of the LSST observing strategy relevant to the LSST Dark En…
▽ More
The generation-defining Vera C. Rubin Observatory will make state-of-the-art measurements of both the static and transient universe through its Legacy Survey for Space and Time (LSST). With such capabilities, it is immensely challenging to optimize the LSST observing strategy across the survey's wide range of science drivers. Many aspects of the LSST observing strategy relevant to the LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration, such as survey footprint definition, single visit exposure time and the cadence of repeat visits in different filters, are yet to be finalized. Here, we present metrics used to assess the impact of observing strategy on the cosmological probes considered most sensitive to survey design; these are large-scale structure, weak lensing, type Ia supernovae, kilonovae and strong lens systems (as well as photometric redshifts, which enable many of these probes). We evaluate these metrics for over 100 different simulated potential survey designs. Our results show that multiple observing strategy decisions can profoundly impact cosmological constraints with LSST; these include adjusting the survey footprint, ensuring repeat nightly visits are taken in different filters and enforcing regular cadence. We provide public code for our metrics, which makes them readily available for evaluating further modifications to the survey design. We conclude with a set of recommendations and highlight observing strategy factors that require further research.
△ Less
Submitted 12 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
-
Optimising LSST Observing Strategy for Weak Lensing Systematics
Authors:
Husni Almoubayyed,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Humna Awan,
Eric Gawiser,
R. Lynne Jones,
Joshua Meyers,
J. Anthony Tyson,
Peter Yoachim,
The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration
Abstract:
The LSST survey will provide unprecedented statistical power for measurements of dark energy. Consequently, controlling systematic uncertainties is becoming more important than ever. The LSST observing strategy will affect the statistical uncertainty and systematics control for many science cases; here, we focus on weak lensing systematics. The fact that the LSST observing strategy involves hundre…
▽ More
The LSST survey will provide unprecedented statistical power for measurements of dark energy. Consequently, controlling systematic uncertainties is becoming more important than ever. The LSST observing strategy will affect the statistical uncertainty and systematics control for many science cases; here, we focus on weak lensing systematics. The fact that the LSST observing strategy involves hundreds of visits to the same sky area provides new opportunities for systematics mitigation. We explore these opportunities by testing how different dithering strategies (pointing offsets and rotational angle of the camera in different exposures) affect additive weak lensing shear systematics on a baseline operational simulation, using the $ρ-$statistics formalism. Some dithering strategies improve systematics control at the end of the survey by a factor of up to $\sim 3-4$ better than others. We find that a random translational dithering strategy, applied with random rotational dithering at every filter change, is the most effective of those strategies tested in this work at averaging down systematics. Adopting this dithering algorithm, we explore the effect of varying the area of the survey footprint, exposure time, number of exposures in a visit, and exposure to the Galactic plane. We find that any change that increases the average number of exposures (in filters relevant to weak lensing) reduces the additive shear systematics. Some ways to achieve this increase may not be favorable for the weak lensing statistical constraining power or for other probes, and we explore the relative trade-offs between these options given constraints on the overall survey parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2020; v1 submitted 22 June, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Core Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
Authors:
Nora Elisa Chisari,
David Alonso,
Elisabeth Krause,
C. Danielle Leonard,
Philip Bull,
Jérémy Neveu,
Antonia Villarreal,
Sukhdeep Singh,
Thomas McClintock,
John Ellison,
Zilong Du,
Joe Zuntz,
Alexander Mead,
Shahab Joudaki,
Christiane S. Lorenz,
Tilman Troester,
Javier Sanchez,
Francois Lanusse,
Mustapha Ishak,
Renée Hlozek,
Jonathan Blazek,
Jean-Eric Campagne,
Husni Almoubayyed,
Tim Eifler,
Matthew Kirby
, et al. (5 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Core Cosmology Library (CCL) provides routines to compute basic cosmological observables to a high degree of accuracy, which have been verified with an extensive suite of validation tests. Predictions are provided for many cosmological quantities, including distances, angular power spectra, correlation functions, halo bias and the halo mass function through state-of-the-art modeling prescripti…
▽ More
The Core Cosmology Library (CCL) provides routines to compute basic cosmological observables to a high degree of accuracy, which have been verified with an extensive suite of validation tests. Predictions are provided for many cosmological quantities, including distances, angular power spectra, correlation functions, halo bias and the halo mass function through state-of-the-art modeling prescriptions available in the literature. Fiducial specifications for the expected galaxy distributions for the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) are also included, together with the capability of computing redshift distributions for a user-defined photometric redshift model. A rigorous validation procedure, based on comparisons between CCL and independent software packages, allows us to establish a well-defined numerical accuracy for each predicted quantity. As a result, predictions for correlation functions of galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing and cosmic shear are demonstrated to be within a fraction of the expected statistical uncertainty of the observables for the models and in the range of scales of interest to LSST. CCL is an open source software package written in C, with a python interface and publicly available at https://github.com/LSSTDESC/CCL.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2019; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Optimizing the LSST Observing Strategy for Dark Energy Science: DESC Recommendations for the Wide-Fast-Deep Survey
Authors:
Michelle Lochner,
Daniel M. Scolnic,
Humna Awan,
Nicolas Regnault,
Philippe Gris,
Rachel Mandelbaum,
Eric Gawiser,
Husni Almoubayyed,
Christian N. Setzer,
Simon Huber,
Melissa L. Graham,
Renée Hložek,
Rahul Biswas,
Tim Eifler,
Daniel Rothchild,
Tarek Allam Jr,
Jonathan Blazek,
Chihway Chang,
Thomas Collett,
Ariel Goobar,
Isobel M. Hook,
Mike Jarvis,
Saurabh W. Jha,
Alex G. Kim,
Phil Marshall
, et al. (11 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Cosmology is one of the four science pillars of LSST, which promises to be transformative for our understanding of dark energy and dark matter. The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) has been tasked with deriving constraints on cosmological parameters from LSST data. Each of the cosmological probes for LSST is heavily impacted by the choice of observing strategy. This white paper is wri…
▽ More
Cosmology is one of the four science pillars of LSST, which promises to be transformative for our understanding of dark energy and dark matter. The LSST Dark Energy Science Collaboration (DESC) has been tasked with deriving constraints on cosmological parameters from LSST data. Each of the cosmological probes for LSST is heavily impacted by the choice of observing strategy. This white paper is written by the LSST DESC Observing Strategy Task Force (OSTF), which represents the entire collaboration, and aims to make recommendations on observing strategy that will benefit all cosmological analyses with LSST. It is accompanied by the DESC DDF (Deep Drilling Fields) white paper (Scolnic et al.). We use a variety of metrics to understand the effects of the observing strategy on measurements of weak lensing, large-scale structure, clusters, photometric redshifts, supernovae, strong lensing and kilonovae. In order to reduce systematic uncertainties, we conclude that the current baseline observing strategy needs to be significantly modified to result in the best possible cosmological constraints. We provide some key recommendations: moving the WFD (Wide-Fast-Deep) footprint to avoid regions of high extinction, taking visit pairs in different filters, changing the 2x15s snaps to a single exposure to improve efficiency, focusing on strategies that reduce long gaps (>15 days) between observations, and prioritizing spatial uniformity at several intervals during the 10-year survey.
△ Less
Submitted 14 December, 2018; v1 submitted 30 November, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
