-
Super-adiabatic Temperature Gradient at Jupiter's Equatorial Zone and Implications for the Water Abundance
Authors:
Cheng Li,
Michael Allison,
Sushil Atreya,
Shawn Brueshaber,
Leigh N. Fletcher,
Tristan Guillot,
Liming Li,
Jonathan Lunine,
Yamila Miguel,
Glenn Orton,
Paul Steffes,
J. Hunter Waite,
Michael H. Wong,
Steven Levin,
Scott Bolton
Abstract:
The temperature structure of a giant planet was traditionally thought to be an adiabat assuming convective mixing homogenizes entropy. The only in-situ measurement made by the Galileo Probe detected a near-adiabatic temperature structure within one of Jupiter's 5$μ$m hot spots with small but definite local departures from adiabaticity. We analyze Juno's microwave observations near Jupiter's equato…
▽ More
The temperature structure of a giant planet was traditionally thought to be an adiabat assuming convective mixing homogenizes entropy. The only in-situ measurement made by the Galileo Probe detected a near-adiabatic temperature structure within one of Jupiter's 5$μ$m hot spots with small but definite local departures from adiabaticity. We analyze Juno's microwave observations near Jupiter's equator (0 ~ 5$^o$N) and find that the equatorial temperature structure is best characterized by a stable super-adiabatic temperature profile rather than an adiabatic one. Water is the only substance with sufficient abundance to alter the atmosphere's mean molecular weight and prevent dynamic instability if a super-adiabatic temperature gradient exists. Thus, from the super-adiabaticity, our results indicate a water concentration (or the oxygen to hydrogen ratio) of about 4.9 times solar with a possible range of 1.5 ~ 8.3 times solar in Jupiter's equatorial region.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Jupiter's Temperature Structure: A Reassessment of the Voyager Radio Occultation Measurements
Authors:
Pranika Gupta,
Sushil K. Atreya,
Paul G. Steffes,
Leigh N. Fletcher,
Tristan Guillot,
Michael D. Allison,
Scott J. Bolton,
Ravit Helled,
Steven Levin,
Cheng Li,
Jonathan I. Lunine,
Yamila Miguel,
Glenn S. Orton,
J. Hunter Waite,
Paul Withers
Abstract:
The thermal structure of planetary atmospheres is an essential input for predicting and retrieving the distribution of gases and aerosols, as well as the bulk chemical abundances. In the case of Jupiter, the temperature at a reference level - generally taken at 1 bar - serves as the anchor in models used to derive the planet's interior structure and composition. Most models assume the temperature…
▽ More
The thermal structure of planetary atmospheres is an essential input for predicting and retrieving the distribution of gases and aerosols, as well as the bulk chemical abundances. In the case of Jupiter, the temperature at a reference level - generally taken at 1 bar - serves as the anchor in models used to derive the planet's interior structure and composition. Most models assume the temperature measured by the Galileo probe (Seiff et al. 1998). However, those data correspond to a single location, an unusually clear, dry region, affected by local atmospheric dynamics. On the other hand, the Voyager radio occultation observations cover a wider range of latitudes, longitudes, and times (Lindal et al. 1981). The Voyager retrievals were based on atmospheric composition and radio refractivity data that require updating and were never properly tabulated: the few existing tabulations are incomplete and ambiguous. Here, we present a systematic electronic digitization of all available temperature profiles from Voyager, followed by their reanalysis, employing currently accepted values of the abundances and radio refractivities of atmospheric species. We find the corrected temperature at the 1 bar level to be up to 4 K greater than previously published values, i.e., 170.3{\pm}3.8 K at 12°S (Voyager 1 ingress) and 167.3{\pm}3.8 K at 0°N (Voyager 1 egress). This is to be compared with the Galileo probe value of 166.1{\pm}0.8 K at the edge of an unusual feature at 6.57°N. Altogether, this suggests that Jupiter's tropospheric temperatures may vary spatially by up to 7 K between 7°N and 12°S.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2022; v1 submitted 25 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Jupiter's Temperate Belt/Zone Contrasts Revealed at Depth by Juno Microwave Observations
Authors:
L. N. Fletcher,
F. A. Oyafuso,
M. Allison,
A. Ingersoll,
L. Li,
Y. Kaspi,
E. Galanti,
M. H. Wong,
G. S. Orton,
K. Duer,
Z. Zhang,
C. Li,
T. Guillot,
S. M. Levin,
S. Bolton
Abstract:
Juno Microwave Radiometer (MWR) observations of Jupiter's mid-latitudes reveal a strong correlation between brightness temperature contrasts and zonal winds, confirming that the banded structure extends throughout the troposphere. However, the microwave brightness gradient is observed to change sign with depth: the belts are microwave-bright in the $p<5$ bar range and microwave-dark in the $p>10$…
▽ More
Juno Microwave Radiometer (MWR) observations of Jupiter's mid-latitudes reveal a strong correlation between brightness temperature contrasts and zonal winds, confirming that the banded structure extends throughout the troposphere. However, the microwave brightness gradient is observed to change sign with depth: the belts are microwave-bright in the $p<5$ bar range and microwave-dark in the $p>10$ bar range. The transition level (which we call the jovicline) is evident in the MWR 11.5 cm channel, which samples the 5-14 bar range when using the limb-darkening at all emission angles. The transition is located between 4 and 10 bars, and implies that belts change with depth from being NH$_3$-depleted to NH$_3$-enriched, or from physically-warm to physically-cool, or more likely a combination of both. The change in character occurs near the statically stable layer associated with water condensation. The implications of the transition are discussed in terms of ammonia redistribution via meridional circulation cells with opposing flows above and below the water condensation layer, and in terms of the `mushball' precipitation model, which predicts steeper vertical ammonia gradients in the belts versus the zones. We show via the moist thermal wind equation that both the temperature and ammonia interpretations can lead to vertical shear on the zonal winds, but the shear is $\sim50\times$ weaker if only NH$_3$ gradients are considered. Conversely, if MWR observations are associated with kinetic temperature gradients then it would produce zonal winds that increase in strength down to the jovicline, consistent with Galileo probe measurements; then decay slowly at higher pressures.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The water abundance in Jupiter's equatorial zone
Authors:
Cheng Li,
Andrew Ingersoll,
Scott Bolton,
Steven Levin,
Michael Janssen,
Sushil Atreya,
Jonathan Lunine,
Paul Steffes,
Shannon Brown,
Tristan Guillot,
Michael Allison,
John Arballo,
Amadeo Bellotti,
Virgil Adumitroaie,
Samuel Gulkis,
Amoree Hodges,
Liming Li,
Sidharth Misra,
Glenn Orton,
Fabiano Oyafuso,
Daniel Santos-Costa,
Hunter Waite,
Zhimeng Zhang
Abstract:
Oxygen is the most common element after hydrogen and helium in Jupiter's atmosphere, and may have been the primary condensable (as water ice) in the protoplanetary disk. Prior to the Juno mission, in situ measurements of Jupiter's water abundance were obtained from the Galileo Probe, which dropped into a meteorologically anomalous site. The findings of the Galileo Probe were inconclusive because t…
▽ More
Oxygen is the most common element after hydrogen and helium in Jupiter's atmosphere, and may have been the primary condensable (as water ice) in the protoplanetary disk. Prior to the Juno mission, in situ measurements of Jupiter's water abundance were obtained from the Galileo Probe, which dropped into a meteorologically anomalous site. The findings of the Galileo Probe were inconclusive because the concentration of water was still increasing when the probe died. Here, we initially report on the water abundance in the equatorial region, from 0 to 4 degrees north latitude, based on 1.25 to 22 GHz data from Juno Microwave radiometer probing approximately 0.7 to 30 bars pressure. Because Juno discovered the deep atmosphere to be surprisingly variable as a function of latitude, it remains to confirm whether the equatorial abundance represents Jupiter's global water abundance. The water abundance at the equatorial region is inferred to be $2.5_{-1.6}^{+2.2}\times10^3$ ppm, or $2.7_{-1.7}^{+2.4}$ times the protosolar oxygen elemental ratio to H (1$σ$ uncertainties). If reflective of the global water abundance, the result suggests that the planetesimals formed Jupiter are unlikely to be water-rich clathrate hydrates.
△ Less
Submitted 18 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
