-
Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
Y. Mellier,
Abdurro'uf,
J. A. Acevedo Barroso,
A. Achúcarro,
J. Adamek,
R. Adam,
G. E. Addison,
N. Aghanim,
M. Aguena,
V. Ajani,
Y. Akrami,
A. Al-Bahlawan,
A. Alavi,
I. S. Albuquerque,
G. Alestas,
G. Alguero,
A. Allaoui,
S. W. Allen,
V. Allevato,
A. V. Alonso-Tetilla,
B. Altieri,
A. Alvarez-Candal,
A. Amara,
L. Amendola
, et al. (1086 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14…
▽ More
The current standard model of cosmology successfully describes a variety of measurements, but the nature of its main ingredients, dark matter and dark energy, remains unknown. Euclid is a medium-class mission in the Cosmic Vision 2015-2025 programme of the European Space Agency (ESA) that will provide high-resolution optical imaging, as well as near-infrared imaging and spectroscopy, over about 14,000 deg^2 of extragalactic sky. In addition to accurate weak lensing and clustering measurements that probe structure formation over half of the age of the Universe, its primary probes for cosmology, these exquisite data will enable a wide range of science. This paper provides a high-level overview of the mission, summarising the survey characteristics, the various data-processing steps, and data products. We also highlight the main science objectives and expected performance.
△ Less
Submitted 22 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps II. Cosmological results
Authors:
M. Gatti,
G. Campailla,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
J. Williamson,
M. Raveri,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
G. Giannini,
M. Yamamoto,
C. Zhou,
J. Blazek,
D. Anbajagane,
S. Samuroff,
T. Kacprzak,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen
, et al. (77 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosm…
▽ More
We present a simulation-based cosmological analysis using a combination of Gaussian and non-Gaussian statistics of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps from the first three years (Y3) of the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics; 3) the scattering transform. Our analysis is fully based on simulations, spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and forward models the most relevant sources of systematics inherent in the data: masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration. We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a simulation-based inference approach. Including and combining different non-Gaussian statistics is a powerful tool that strongly improves constraints over Gaussian statistics (in our case, the second moments); in particular, the Figure of Merit $\textrm{FoM}(S_8, Ω_{\textrm{m}})$ is improved by 70 percent ($Λ$CDM) and 90 percent ($w$CDM). When all the summary statistics are combined, we achieve a 2 percent constraint on the amplitude of fluctuations parameter $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_{\textrm{m}}/0.3)^{0.5}$, obtaining $S_8 = 0.794 \pm 0.017$ ($Λ$CDM) and $S_8 = 0.817 \pm 0.021$ ($w$CDM). The constraints from different statistics are shown to be internally consistent (with a $p$-value>0.1 for all combinations of statistics examined). We compare our results to other weak lensing results from the DES Y3 data, finding good consistency; we also compare with results from external datasets, such as \planck{} constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background, finding statistical agreement, with discrepancies no greater than $<2.2σ$.
△ Less
Submitted 17 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: simulation-based cosmological inference with wavelet harmonics, scattering transforms, and moments of weak lensing mass maps I: validation on simulations
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
J. Williamson,
B. Jain,
V. Ajani,
D. Anbajagane,
G. Giannini,
C. Zhou,
A. Porredon,
J. Prat,
M. Yamamoto,
J. Blazek,
T. Kacprzak,
S. Samuroff,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
C. Chang,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase…
▽ More
Beyond-two-point statistics contain additional information on cosmological as well as astrophysical and observational (systematics) parameters. In this methodology paper we provide an end-to-end simulation-based analysis of a set of Gaussian and non-Gaussian weak lensing statistics using detailed mock catalogues of the Dark Energy Survey. We implement: 1) second and third moments; 2) wavelet phase harmonics (WPH); 3) the scattering transform (ST). Our analysis is fully based on simulations, it spans a space of seven $νw$CDM cosmological parameters, and it forward models the most relevant sources of systematics of the data (masks, noise variations, clustering of the sources, intrinsic alignments, and shear and redshift calibration). We implement a neural network compression of the summary statistics, and we estimate the parameter posteriors using a likelihood-free-inference approach. We validate the pipeline extensively, and we find that WPH exhibits the strongest performance when combined with second moments, followed by ST. and then by third moments. The combination of all the different statistics further enhances constraints with respect to second moments, up to 25 per cent, 15 per cent, and 90 per cent for $S_8$, $Ω_{\rm m}$, and the Figure-Of-Merit ${\rm FoM_{S_8,Ω_{\rm m}}}$, respectively. We further find that non-Gaussian statistics improve constraints on $w$ and on the amplitude of intrinsic alignment with respect to second moments constraints. The methodological advances presented here are suitable for application to Stage IV surveys from Euclid, Rubin-LSST, and Roman with additional validation on mock catalogues for each survey. In a companion paper we present an application to DES Year 3 data.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2023; v1 submitted 26 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
Beyond the 3rd moment: A practical study of using lensing convergence CDFs for cosmology with DES Y3
Authors:
D. Anbajagane,
C. Chang,
A. Banerjee,
T. Abel,
M. Gatti,
V. Ajani,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
E. J. Baxter,
K. Bechtol,
M. R. Becker,
G. M. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
A. Carnero Rosell,
M. Carrasco Kind,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. DeRose,
H. T. Diehl,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
A. Drlica-Wagner,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (73 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Widefield surveys of the sky probe many clustered scalar fields -- such as galaxy counts, lensing potential, gas pressure, etc. -- that are sensitive to different cosmological and astrophysical processes. Our ability to constrain such processes from these fields depends crucially on the statistics chosen to summarize the field. In this work, we explore the cumulative distribution function (CDF) at…
▽ More
Widefield surveys of the sky probe many clustered scalar fields -- such as galaxy counts, lensing potential, gas pressure, etc. -- that are sensitive to different cosmological and astrophysical processes. Our ability to constrain such processes from these fields depends crucially on the statistics chosen to summarize the field. In this work, we explore the cumulative distribution function (CDF) at multiple scales as a summary of the galaxy lensing convergence field. Using a suite of N-body lightcone simulations, we show the CDFs' constraining power is modestly better than that of the 2nd and 3rd moments of the field, as they approximately capture the information from all moments of the field in a concise data vector. We then study the practical aspects of applying the CDFs to observational data, using the first three years of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) data as an example, and compute the impact of different systematics on the CDFs. The contributions from the point spread function are 2-3 orders of magnitude below the cosmological signal, while those from reduced shear approximation contribute $\lesssim 1\%$ to the signal. Source clustering effects and baryon imprints contribute $1-10\%$. Enforcing scale cuts to limit systematics-driven biases in parameter constraints degrades these constraints a noticeable amount, and this degradation is similar for the CDFs and the moments. We also detect correlations between the observed convergence field and the shape noise field at $13σ$. We find that the non-Gaussian correlations in the noise field must be modeled accurately to use the CDFs, or other statistics sensitive to all moments, as a rigorous cosmology tool.
△ Less
Submitted 7 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Detection of the significant impact of source clustering on higher-order statistics with DES Year 3 weak gravitational lensing data
Authors:
M. Gatti,
N. Jeffrey,
L. Whiteway,
V. Ajani,
T. Kacprzak,
D. Zürcher,
C. Chang,
B. Jain,
J. Blazek,
E. Krause,
A. Alarcon,
A. Amon,
K. Bechtol,
M. Becker,
G. Bernstein,
A. Campos,
R. Chen,
A. Choi,
C. Davis,
J. Derose,
H. T. Diehl,
S. Dodelson,
C. Doux,
K. Eckert,
J. Elvin-Poole
, et al. (76 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are large…
▽ More
We demonstrate and measure the impact of source galaxy clustering on higher-order summary statistics of weak gravitational lensing data. By comparing simulated data with galaxies that either trace or do not trace the underlying density field, we show this effect can exceed measurement uncertainties for common higher-order statistics for certain analysis choices. Source clustering effects are larger at small scales and for statistics applied to combinations of low and high redshift samples, and diminish at high redshift. We evaluate the impact on different weak lensing observables, finding that third moments and wavelet phase harmonics are more affected than peak count statistics. Using Dark Energy Survey Year 3 data we construct null tests for the source-clustering-free case, finding a $p$-value of $p=4\times10^{-3}$ (2.6 $σ$) using third-order map moments and $p=3\times10^{-11}$ (6.5 $σ$) using wavelet phase harmonics. The impact of source clustering on cosmological inference can be either be included in the model or minimized through \textit{ad-hoc} procedures (e.g. scale cuts). We verify that the procedures adopted in existing DES Y3 cosmological analyses (using map moments and peaks) were sufficient to render this effect negligible. Failing to account for source clustering can significantly impact cosmological inference from higher-order gravitational lensing statistics, e.g. higher-order N-point functions, wavelet-moment observables (including phase harmonics and scattering transforms), and deep learning or field level summary statistics of weak lensing maps. We provide recipes both to minimise the impact of source clustering and to incorporate source clustering effects into forward-modelled mock data.
△ Less
Submitted 27 July, 2023; v1 submitted 25 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Euclid Preparation. XXVIII. Forecasts for ten different higher-order weak lensing statistics
Authors:
Euclid Collaboration,
V. Ajani,
M. Baldi,
A. Barthelemy,
A. Boyle,
P. Burger,
V. F. Cardone,
S. Cheng,
S. Codis,
C. Giocoli,
J. Harnois-Déraps,
S. Heydenreich,
V. Kansal,
M. Kilbinger,
L. Linke,
C. Llinares,
N. Martinet,
C. Parroni,
A. Peel,
S. Pires,
L. Porth,
I. Tereno,
C. Uhlemann,
M. Vicinanza,
S. Vinciguerra
, et al. (189 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Recent cosmic shear studies have shown that higher-order statistics (HOS) developed by independent teams now outperform standard two-point estimators in terms of statistical precision thanks to their sensitivity to the non-Gaussian features of large-scale structure. The aim of the Higher-Order Weak Lensing Statistics (HOWLS) project is to assess, compare, and combine the constraining power of ten…
▽ More
Recent cosmic shear studies have shown that higher-order statistics (HOS) developed by independent teams now outperform standard two-point estimators in terms of statistical precision thanks to their sensitivity to the non-Gaussian features of large-scale structure. The aim of the Higher-Order Weak Lensing Statistics (HOWLS) project is to assess, compare, and combine the constraining power of ten different HOS on a common set of $Euclid$-like mocks, derived from N-body simulations. In this first paper of the HOWLS series, we computed the nontomographic ($Ω_{\rm m}$, $σ_8$) Fisher information for the one-point probability distribution function, peak counts, Minkowski functionals, Betti numbers, persistent homology Betti numbers and heatmap, and scattering transform coefficients, and we compare them to the shear and convergence two-point correlation functions in the absence of any systematic bias. We also include forecasts for three implementations of higher-order moments, but these cannot be robustly interpreted as the Gaussian likelihood assumption breaks down for these statistics. Taken individually, we find that each HOS outperforms the two-point statistics by a factor of around two in the precision of the forecasts with some variations across statistics and cosmological parameters. When combining all the HOS, this increases to a $4.5$ times improvement, highlighting the immense potential of HOS for cosmic shear cosmological analyses with $Euclid$. The data used in this analysis are publicly released with the paper.
△ Less
Submitted 10 July, 2023; v1 submitted 30 January, 2023;
originally announced January 2023.
-
Starlet higher order statistics for galaxy clustering and weak lensing
Authors:
Virginia Ajani,
Joachim Harnois-Déraps,
Valeria Pettorino,
Jean-Luc Starck
Abstract:
We present a first application to photometric galaxy clustering and weak lensing of wavelet based multi-scale higher order summary statistics: starlet peak counts and starlet $\ell_1$-norm. Peak counts are the local maxima in the map and the $\ell_1$-norm is computed via the sum of the absolute values of the starlet (wavelet) decomposition coefficients of a map, providing a fast multi-scale calcul…
▽ More
We present a first application to photometric galaxy clustering and weak lensing of wavelet based multi-scale higher order summary statistics: starlet peak counts and starlet $\ell_1$-norm. Peak counts are the local maxima in the map and the $\ell_1$-norm is computed via the sum of the absolute values of the starlet (wavelet) decomposition coefficients of a map, providing a fast multi-scale calculation of the pixel distribution, encoding the information of all pixels in the map. We employ the cosmo-SLICS simulations sources and lenses catalogues and we compute wavelet based higher order statistics in the context of combined probes and their potential when applied to the weak lensing convergence maps and galaxy maps. We get forecasts on the matter density parameter $Ω_{\rm m}$, the reduced Hubble constant $h$, the matter fluctuation amplitude $σ_8$, and the dark energy equation of state parameter $w_0$. We find that, in our setting for this first application, considering the two probes as independent, starlet peaks and the $\ell_1$-norm represent interesting summary statistics that can improve the constraints with respect to the power spectrum also in the case of photometric galaxy clustering and when the two probes are combined.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2023; v1 submitted 18 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Towards a full $w$CDM map-based analysis for weak lensing surveys
Authors:
Dominik Zürcher,
Janis Fluri,
Virginia Ajani,
Silvan Fischbacher,
Alexandre Refregier,
Tomasz Kacprzak
Abstract:
The next generation of weak lensing surveys will measure the matter distribution of the local Universe with unprecedented precision, allowing the resolution of non-Gaussian features of the convergence field. This encourages the use of higher-order mass-map statistics for cosmological parameter inference. We extend the forward-modelling based methodology introduced in a previous forecast paper to m…
▽ More
The next generation of weak lensing surveys will measure the matter distribution of the local Universe with unprecedented precision, allowing the resolution of non-Gaussian features of the convergence field. This encourages the use of higher-order mass-map statistics for cosmological parameter inference. We extend the forward-modelling based methodology introduced in a previous forecast paper to match these new requirements. We provide multiple forecasts for the wCDM parameter constraints that can be expected from stage 3 and 4 weak lensing surveys. We consider different survey setups, summary statistics and mass map filters including wavelets. We take into account the shear bias, photometric redshift uncertainties and intrinsic alignment. The impact of baryons is investigated and the necessary scale cuts are applied. We compare the angular power spectrum analysis to peak and minima counts as well as Minkowski functionals of the mass maps. We find a preference for Starlet over Gaussian filters. Our results suggest that using a survey setup with 10 instead of 5 tomographic redshift bins is beneficial. Adding cross-tomographic information improves the constraints on cosmology and especially on galaxy intrinsic alignment for all statistics. In terms of constraining power, we find the angular power spectrum and the peak counts to be equally matched for stage 4 surveys, followed by minima counts and the Minkowski functionals. Combining different summary statistics significantly improves the constraints and compensates the stringent scale cuts. We identify the most `cost-effective' combination to be the angular power spectrum, peak counts and Minkowski functionals following Starlet filtering.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2023; v1 submitted 3 June, 2022;
originally announced June 2022.
-
UNIONS: The impact of systematic errors on weak-lensing peak counts
Authors:
Emma Ayçoberry,
Virginia Ajani,
Axel Guinot,
Martin Kilbinger,
Valeria Pettorino,
Samuel Farrens,
Jean-Luc Starck,
Raphaël Gavazzi,
Michael J. Hudson
Abstract:
UNIONS is an ongoing deep photometric multi-band survey of the Northern sky. As part of UNIONS, CFIS provides r-band data which we use to study weak-lensing peak counts for cosmological inference. We assess systematic effects for weak-lensing peak counts and their impact on cosmological parameters for the UNIONS survey. In particular, we present results on local calibration, metacalibration shear…
▽ More
UNIONS is an ongoing deep photometric multi-band survey of the Northern sky. As part of UNIONS, CFIS provides r-band data which we use to study weak-lensing peak counts for cosmological inference. We assess systematic effects for weak-lensing peak counts and their impact on cosmological parameters for the UNIONS survey. In particular, we present results on local calibration, metacalibration shear bias, baryonic feedback, the source galaxy redshift estimate, intrinsic alignment, and the cluster member dilution. For each uncertainty and systematic effect, we describe our mitigation scheme and the impact on cosmological parameter constraints. We obtain constraints on cosmological parameters from MCMC using CFIS data and MassiveNuS N-body simulations as a model for peak counts statistics. Depending on the calibration (local versus global, and the inclusion of the residual multiplicative shear bias), the mean matter density parameter $Ω_m$ can shift up to $-0.024$ ($-0.5σ$). We also see that including baryonic corrections can shift $Ω_m$ by $+0.027$ ($+0.5 σ$) with respect to the DM-only simulations. Reducing the impact of the intrinsic alignment and cluster member dilution through signal-to-noise cuts can lead to a shift in $Ω_m$ of $+0.027$ ($+0.5 σ$). Finally, with a mean redshift uncertainty of $Δ\bar{z} = 0.03$, we see that the shift of $Ω_m$ ($+0.001$ which corresponds to $+0.02 σ$) is not significant. This paper investigates for the first time with UNIONS weak-lensing data and peak counts the impact of systematic effects. The value of $Ω_m$ is the most impacted and can shift up to $\sim 0.03$ which corresponds to $0.5σ$ depending on the choices for each systematics. We expect constraints to become more reliable with future (larger) data catalogues, for which the current pipeline will provide a starting point.
△ Less
Submitted 22 March, 2023; v1 submitted 13 April, 2022;
originally announced April 2022.
-
Starlet l1-norm for weak lensing cosmology
Authors:
Virginia Ajani,
Jean-Luc Starck,
Valeria Pettorino
Abstract:
We present a new summary statistic for weak lensing observables, higher than second order, suitable for extracting non-Gaussian cosmological information and inferring cosmological parameters. We name this statistic the 'starlet $\ell_1$-norm' as it is computed via the sum of the absolute values of the starlet (wavelet) decomposition coefficients of a weak lensing map. In comparison to the state-of…
▽ More
We present a new summary statistic for weak lensing observables, higher than second order, suitable for extracting non-Gaussian cosmological information and inferring cosmological parameters. We name this statistic the 'starlet $\ell_1$-norm' as it is computed via the sum of the absolute values of the starlet (wavelet) decomposition coefficients of a weak lensing map. In comparison to the state-of-the-art higher-order statistics -- weak lensing peak counts and minimum counts, or the combination of the two -- the $\ell_1$-norm provides a fast multi-scale calculation of the full void and peak distribution, avoiding the problem of defining what a peak is and what a void is: The $\ell_1$-norm carries the information encoded in all pixels of the map, not just the ones in local maxima and minima. We show its potential by applying it to the weak lensing convergence maps provided by the MassiveNus simulations to get constraints on the sum of neutrino masses, the matter density parameter, and the amplitude of the primordial power spectrum. We find that, in an ideal setting without further systematics, the starlet $\ell_1$-norm remarkably outperforms commonly used summary statistics, such as the power spectrum or the combination of peak and void counts, in terms of constraining power, representing a promising new unified framework to simultaneously account for the information encoded in peak counts and voids. We find that the starlet $\ell_1$-norm outperforms the power spectrum by $72\%$ on M$_ν$, $60\%$ on $Ω_{\rm m}$, and $75\%$ on $A_{\rm s}$ for the Euclid-like setting considered; it also improves upon the state-of-the-art combination of peaks and voids for a single smoothing scale by $24\%$ on M$_ν$, $50\%$ on $Ω_{\rm m}$, and $24\%$ on $A_{\rm s}$.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Constraining neutrino masses with weak-lensing multiscale peak counts
Authors:
Virginia Ajani,
Austin Peel,
Valeria Pettorino,
Jean-Luc Starck,
Zack Li,
Jia Liu
Abstract:
Massive neutrinos influence the background evolution of the Universe as well as the growth of structure. Being able to model this effect and constrain the sum of their masses is one of the key challenges in modern cosmology. Weak-lensing cosmological constraints will also soon reach higher levels of precision with next-generation surveys like LSST, WFIRST and Euclid. We use the MassiveNus simulati…
▽ More
Massive neutrinos influence the background evolution of the Universe as well as the growth of structure. Being able to model this effect and constrain the sum of their masses is one of the key challenges in modern cosmology. Weak-lensing cosmological constraints will also soon reach higher levels of precision with next-generation surveys like LSST, WFIRST and Euclid. We use the MassiveNus simulations to derive constraints on the sum of neutrino masses $M_ν$, the present-day total matter density $Ω_{\rm m}$, and the primordial power spectrum normalization $A_{\rm s}$ in a tomographic setting. We measure the lensing power spectrum as second-order statistics along with peak counts as higher-order statistics on lensing convergence maps generated from the simulations. We investigate the impact of multiscale filtering approaches on cosmological parameters by employing a starlet (wavelet) filter and a concatenation of Gaussian filters. In both cases peak counts perform better than the power spectrum on the set of parameters [$M_ν$, $Ω_{\rm m}$, $A_{\rm s}$] respectively by 63$\%$, 40$\%$ and 72$\%$ when using a starlet filter and by 70$\%$, 40$\%$ and 77$\%$ when using a multiscale Gaussian. More importantly, we show that when using a multiscale approach, joining power spectrum and peaks does not add any relevant information over considering just the peaks alone. While both multiscale filters behave similarly, we find that with the starlet filter the majority of the information in the data covariance matrix is encoded in the diagonal elements; this can be an advantage when inverting the matrix, speeding up the numerical implementation.
△ Less
Submitted 5 January, 2021; v1 submitted 29 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.