Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Salvador, A I

Measuring Linear and Non-linear Galaxy Bias Using Counts-in-Cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data

Authors: A. I. Salvador, F. J. Sánchez, A. Pagul, J. García-Bellido, E. Sanchez, A. Pujol, J. Frieman, E. Gaztanaga, A. J. Ross, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, T. M. C. Abbott, S. Allam, J. Annis, S. Avila, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, D. L. Burke, A. Carnero Rosell, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, C. E. Cunha, J. De Vicente, H. T. Diehl, P. Doel , et al. (30 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Non-linear bias measurements require a great level of control of potential systematic effects in galaxy redshift surveys. Our goal is to demonstrate the viability of using Counts-in-Cells (CiC), a statistical measure of the galaxy distribution, as a competitive method to determine linear and higher-order galaxy bias and assess clustering systematics. We measure the galaxy bias by comparing the fir… ▽ More Non-linear bias measurements require a great level of control of potential systematic effects in galaxy redshift surveys. Our goal is to demonstrate the viability of using Counts-in-Cells (CiC), a statistical measure of the galaxy distribution, as a competitive method to determine linear and higher-order galaxy bias and assess clustering systematics. We measure the galaxy bias by comparing the first four moments of the galaxy density distribution with those of the dark matter distribution. We use data from the MICE simulation to evaluate the performance of this method, and subsequently perform measurements on the public Science Verification (SV) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We find that the linear bias obtained with CiC is consistent with measurements of the bias performed using galaxy-galaxy clustering, galaxy-galaxy lensing, CMB lensing, and shear+clustering measurements. Furthermore, we compute the projected (2D) non-linear bias using the expansion $δ_{g} = \sum_{k=0}^{3} (b_{k}/k!) δ^{k}$, finding a non-zero value for $b_2$ at the $3σ$ level. We also check a non-local bias model and show that the linear bias measurements are robust to the addition of new parameters. We compare our 2D results to the 3D prediction and find compatibility in the large scale regime ($>30$ Mpc $h^{-1}$) △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2018; v1 submitted 26 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Comments: Accepted for publication in MNRAS

Report number: IFT-UAM/CSIC-2018-84, DES-2018-0255

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO

Authors: S. Avila, M. Crocce, A. J. Ross, J. García-Bellido, W. J. Percival, N. Banik H. Camacho, N. Kokron, K. C. Chan, F. Andrade-Oliveira, R. Gomes, D. Gomes, M. Lima, R. Rosenfeld, A. I. Salvador, O. Friedrich, F. B. Abdalla, J. Annis, A. Benoit-Lévy, E. Bertin, D. Brooks, M. Carrasco Kind, J. Carretero, F. J. Castander, C. E. Cunha, L. N. da Costa , et al. (29 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data, both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance, observational volume, redshift d… ▽ More Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data, both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance, observational volume, redshift distribution and uncertainty, and redshift dependent clustering. The simulated samples were built upon HALOGEN (Avila et al. 2015) halo catalogues, based on a $2LPT$ density field with an exponential bias. For each of them, a lightcone is constructed by the superposition of snapshots in the redshift range $0.45<z<1.4$. Uncertainties introduced by so-called photometric redshifts estimators were modelled with a \textit{double-skewed-Gaussian} curve fitted to the data. We also introduce a hybrid HOD-HAM model with two free parameters that are adjusted to achieve a galaxy bias evolution $b(z_{\rm ph})$ that matches the data at the 1-$σ$ level in the range $0.6<z_{\rm ph}<1.0$. We further analyse the galaxy mock catalogues and compare their clustering to the data using the angular correlation function $ w(θ)$, the comoving transverse separation clustering $ξ_{μ<0.8}(s_{\perp})$ and the angular power spectrum $C_\ell$. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: 18 pages, 15 figures, 1 table, published in MNRAS

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Galaxy Sample for BAO Measurement

Authors: M. Crocce, A. J. Ross, I. Sevilla-Noarbe, E. Gaztanaga, J. Elvin-Poole, S. Avila, A. Alarcon, K. C. Chan, N. Banik, J. Carretero, E. Sanchez, W. G. Hartley, C. Sanchez, T. Giannantonio, R. Rosenfeld, A. I. Salvador, M. Garcia-Fernandez, J. Garcia-Bellido, T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, S. Allam, J. Annis, K. Bechtol, A. Benoit-Levy, G. M. Bernstein , et al. (63 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need of high… ▽ More We define and characterise a sample of 1.3 million galaxies extracted from the first year of Dark Energy Survey data, optimised to measure Baryon Acoustic Oscillations in the presence of significant redshift uncertainties. The sample is dominated by luminous red galaxies located at redshifts $z \gtrsim 0.6$. We define the exact selection using color and magnitude cuts that balance the need of high number densities and small photometric redshift uncertainties, using the corresponding forecasted BAO distance error as a figure-of-merit in the process. The typical photo-$z$ uncertainty varies from $2.3\%$ to $3.6\%$ (in units of 1+$z$) from $z=0.6$ to $1$, with number densities from $200$ to $130$ galaxies per deg$^2$ in tomographic bins of width $Δz = 0.1$. Next we summarise the validation of the photometric redshift estimation. We characterise and mitigate observational systematics including stellar contamination, and show that the clustering on large scales is robust in front of those contaminants. We show that the clustering signal in the auto-correlations and cross-correlations is generally consistent with theoretical models, which serves as an additional test of the redshift distributions. △ Less

Submitted 14 December, 2018; v1 submitted 17 December, 2017; originally announced December 2017.

Comments: 15 pages, 12 figures. Added discussion on photo-z validation and other tests added based on referee's comments. Matches published version in MNRAS

Journal ref: MNRAS (2019), Volume 482, Issue 2, p.2807-2822

Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

Authors: DES Collaboration, T. M. C. Abbott, F. B. Abdalla, A. Alarcon, J. Aleksić, S. Allam, S. Allen, A. Amara, J. Annis, J. Asorey, S. Avila, D. Bacon, E. Balbinot, M. Banerji, N. Banik, W. Barkhouse, M. Baumer, E. Baxter, K. Bechtol, M. R. Becker, A. Benoit-Lévy, B. A. Benson, G. M. Bernstein, E. Bertin, J. Blazek , et al. (175 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000… ▽ More We present cosmological results from a combined analysis of galaxy clustering and weak gravitational lensing, using 1321 deg$^2$ of $griz$ imaging data from the first year of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y1). We combine three two-point functions: (i) the cosmic shear correlation function of 26 million source galaxies in four redshift bins, (ii) the galaxy angular autocorrelation function of 650,000 luminous red galaxies in five redshift bins, and (iii) the galaxy-shear cross-correlation of luminous red galaxy positions and source galaxy shears. To demonstrate the robustness of these results, we use independent pairs of galaxy shape, photometric redshift estimation and validation, and likelihood analysis pipelines. To prevent confirmation bias, the bulk of the analysis was carried out while blind to the true results; we describe an extensive suite of systematics checks performed and passed during this blinded phase. The data are modeled in flat $Λ$CDM and $w$CDM cosmologies, marginalizing over 20 nuisance parameters, varying 6 (for $Λ$CDM) or 7 (for $w$CDM) cosmological parameters including the neutrino mass density and including the 457 $\times$ 457 element analytic covariance matrix. We find consistent cosmological results from these three two-point functions, and from their combination obtain $S_8 \equiv σ_8 (Ω_m/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.783^{+0.021}_{-0.025}$ and $Ω_m = 0.264^{+0.032}_{-0.019}$ for $Λ$CDM for $w$CDM, we find $S_8 = 0.794^{+0.029}_{-0.027}$, $Ω_m = 0.279^{+0.043}_{-0.022}$, and $w=-0.80^{+0.20}_{-0.22}$ at 68% CL. The precision of these DES Y1 results rivals that from the Planck cosmic microwave background measurements, allowing a comparison of structure in the very early and late Universe on equal terms. Although the DES Y1 best-fit values for $S_8$ and $Ω_m$ are lower than the central values from Planck ... △ Less

Submitted 1 March, 2019; v1 submitted 4 August, 2017; originally announced August 2017.

Comments: Matches published version. Results essentially unchanged, except updated covariance matrix leads to improved chi^2 (colored text removed)

Report number: FERMILAB-PUB-17-294-PPD

Journal ref: Phys. Rev. D 98, 043526 (2018)

Homogeneity and isotropy in the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue

Authors: David Alonso, Ana Isabel Salvador, Francisco Javier Sánchez, Maciej Bilicki, Juan García-Bellido, Eusebio Sánchez

Abstract: Using the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue we perform a number of statistical tests aimed at detecting possible departures from statistical homogeneity and isotropy in the large-scale structure of the Universe. Making use of the angular homogeneity index, an observable proposed in a previous publication, as well as studying the scaling of the angular clustering and number counts with magnitude… ▽ More Using the 2MASS Photometric Redshift catalogue we perform a number of statistical tests aimed at detecting possible departures from statistical homogeneity and isotropy in the large-scale structure of the Universe. Making use of the angular homogeneity index, an observable proposed in a previous publication, as well as studying the scaling of the angular clustering and number counts with magnitude limit, we place constraints on the fractal nature of the galaxy distribution. We find that the statistical properties of our sample are in excellent agreement with the standard cosmological model, and that it reaches the homogeneous regime significantly faster than a class of fractal models with dimensions $D<2.75$. As part of our search for systematic effects, we also study the presence of hemispherical asymmetries in our data, finding no significant deviation beyond those allowed by the concordance model. △ Less

Submitted 24 March, 2015; v1 submitted 16 December, 2014; originally announced December 2014.

Comments: 18 pages, 13 figures, published in MNRAS