Learning to Plan and Realize Separately for Open-Ended Dialogue Systems
Authors:
Sashank Santhanam,
Zhuo Cheng,
Brodie Mather,
Bonnie Dorr,
Archna Bhatia,
Bryanna Hebenstreit,
Alan Zemel,
Adam Dalton,
Tomek Strzalkowski,
Samira Shaikh
Abstract:
Achieving true human-like ability to conduct a conversation remains an elusive goal for open-ended dialogue systems. We posit this is because extant approaches towards natural language generation (NLG) are typically construed as end-to-end architectures that do not adequately model human generation processes. To investigate, we decouple generation into two separate phases: planning and realization…
▽ More
Achieving true human-like ability to conduct a conversation remains an elusive goal for open-ended dialogue systems. We posit this is because extant approaches towards natural language generation (NLG) are typically construed as end-to-end architectures that do not adequately model human generation processes. To investigate, we decouple generation into two separate phases: planning and realization. In the planning phase, we train two planners to generate plans for response utterances. The realization phase uses response plans to produce an appropriate response. Through rigorous evaluations, both automated and human, we demonstrate that decoupling the process into planning and realization performs better than an end-to-end approach.
△ Less
Submitted 4 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
Detecting Asks in SE attacks: Impact of Linguistic and Structural Knowledge
Authors:
Bonnie J. Dorr,
Archna Bhatia,
Adam Dalton,
Brodie Mather,
Bryanna Hebenstreit,
Sashank Santhanam,
Zhuo Cheng,
Samira Shaikh,
Alan Zemel,
Tomek Strzalkowski
Abstract:
Social engineers attempt to manipulate users into undertaking actions such as downloading malware by clicking links or providing access to money or sensitive information. Natural language processing, computational sociolinguistics, and media-specific structural clues provide a means for detecting both the ask (e.g., buy gift card) and the risk/reward implied by the ask, which we call framing (e.g.…
▽ More
Social engineers attempt to manipulate users into undertaking actions such as downloading malware by clicking links or providing access to money or sensitive information. Natural language processing, computational sociolinguistics, and media-specific structural clues provide a means for detecting both the ask (e.g., buy gift card) and the risk/reward implied by the ask, which we call framing (e.g., lose your job, get a raise). We apply linguistic resources such as Lexical Conceptual Structure to tackle ask detection and also leverage structural clues such as links and their proximity to identified asks to improve confidence in our results. Our experiments indicate that the performance of ask detection, framing detection, and identification of the top ask is improved by linguistically motivated classes coupled with structural clues such as links. Our approach is implemented in a system that informs users about social engineering risk situations.
△ Less
Submitted 25 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
