Fast modeling of the shear three-point correlation function
Authors:
Sunao Sugiyama,
Rafael C. H. Gomes,
Mike Jarvis
Abstract:
The three-point correlation function (3PCF) of a weak lensing shear field contains information that is complementary to that in the two-point correlation function (2PCF), which can help improve the cosmological parameters and calibrate astrophysical and observational systematics parameters. However, the application of the 3PCF to observed data has been limited due to the computational challenges o…
▽ More
The three-point correlation function (3PCF) of a weak lensing shear field contains information that is complementary to that in the two-point correlation function (2PCF), which can help improve the cosmological parameters and calibrate astrophysical and observational systematics parameters. However, the application of the 3PCF to observed data has been limited due to the computational challenges of calculating theoretical predictions of the 3PCF from a bispectrum model. In this paper, we present a new method to compute the shear 3PCF efficiently and accurately. We employ the multipole expansion of the bispectrum to compute the shear 3PCF, and show that the method is substantially more efficient than direct numerical integration. We found that the multipole-based method can compute the shear 3PCF with 5% accuracy in 10 (40) seconds for the single (four) source redshift bin setup. The multipole-based method can be also used to compute the third-order aperture mass statistics quickly and accurately, accounting for the bin-averaging effect on the shear 3PCF. Our method provides a fast and robust tool for probing the underlying cosmological model with third-order statistics of weak lensing shear.
△ Less
Submitted 1 July, 2024;
originally announced July 2024.
Can the gravitational effect of Planet X be detected in current-era tracking of the known major and minor planets?
Authors:
Daniel C. H. Gomes,
Zachary Murray,
Rafael C. H. Gomes,
Matthew J. Holman,
Gary M. Bernstein
Abstract:
Using Fisher information matrices, we forecast the uncertainties $σ_M$ on the measurement of a "Planet X" at heliocentric distance $d_X$ via its tidal gravitational field's action on the known planets. Using planetary measurements currently in hand, including ranging from the Juno, Cassini, and Mars-orbiting spacecraft, we forecast a median uncertainty (over all possible sky positions) of…
▽ More
Using Fisher information matrices, we forecast the uncertainties $σ_M$ on the measurement of a "Planet X" at heliocentric distance $d_X$ via its tidal gravitational field's action on the known planets. Using planetary measurements currently in hand, including ranging from the Juno, Cassini, and Mars-orbiting spacecraft, we forecast a median uncertainty (over all possible sky positions) of $σ_M=0.22M_\oplus (d_x/400\,\textrm{AU})^3.$ A definitive $(5σ)$ detection of a $5M_\oplus$ Planet X at $d_X=400$ AU should be possible over the full sky but over only 5% of the sky at $d_X=800$ AU. The gravity of an undiscovered Earth- or Mars-mass object should be detectable over 90% of the sky to a distance of 260 or 120 AU, respectively. Upcoming Mars ranging improves these limits only slightly. We also investigate the power of high-precision astrometry of $\approx8000$ Jovian Trojans over the 2023--2035 period from the upcoming Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST). We find that the dominant systematic errors in optical Trojan astrometry (photocenter motion, non-gravitational forces, and differential chromatic refraction) can be solved internally with minimal loss of information. The Trojan data allow useful cross-checks with Juno/Cassini/Mars ranging, but do not significantly improve the best-achievable $σ_M$ values until they are $\gtrsim10\times$ more accurate than expected from LSST. The ultimate limiting factor in searches for a Planet X tidal field is confusion with the tidal field created by the fluctuating quadrupole moment of the Kuiper Belt as its members orbit. This background will not, however, become the dominant source of Planet X uncertainty until the data get substantially better than they are today.
△ Less
Submitted 11 May, 2023; v1 submitted 19 December, 2022;
originally announced December 2022.
