Analysis methods for in-beam PET images in proton therapy treatment verification: a comparison based on Monte Carlo simulations
Authors:
M. Moglioni,
A. C. Kraan,
A. Berti,
P. Carra,
P. Cerello,
M. Ciocca,
V. Ferrero,
E. Fiorina,
E. Mazzoni,
M. Morrocchi,
F. Pennazio,
A. Retico,
V. Rosso,
G. Sportelli,
V. Vitolo,
G. Bisogni
Abstract:
Background and purpose: In-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is one of the modalities that can be used for in-vivo non-invasive treatment monitoring in proton therapy. PET distributions obtained during various treatment sessions can be compared in order to identify regions that have anatomical changes. The purpose of this work is to test and compare different analysis methods in the context…
▽ More
Background and purpose: In-beam Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is one of the modalities that can be used for in-vivo non-invasive treatment monitoring in proton therapy. PET distributions obtained during various treatment sessions can be compared in order to identify regions that have anatomical changes. The purpose of this work is to test and compare different analysis methods in the context of inter-fractional PET image comparison for proton treatment verification.
Methods: For our study we used the FLUKA Monte Carlo code and artificially generated CT scans to simulate in-beam PET distributions at different stages during proton therapy treatment. We compared the Beam-Eye-View method, the Most-Likely-Shift method, the Voxel-Based-Morphology method and the gamma evaluation method to compare PET images at the start of treatment, and after a few weeks of treatment. The results were compared to the CT scan.
Results and conclusions: Three-dimensional methods like VBM and gamma are preferred above two-dimensional methods like MLS and BEV if much statistics is available, since the these methods allow to identify the regions with anomalous activity. The VBM approach has as disadvantage that a larger number of MC simulations is needed. The gamma analysis has the disadvantage that no clinical indication exist on tolerance criteria. In terms of calculation time, the BEV and MLS method are preferred. We recommend to use the four methods together, in order to best identify the location and cause of the activity changes.
△ Less
Submitted 1 December, 2022; v1 submitted 10 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
The FragmentatiOn Of Target Experiment (FOOT) and its DAQ system
Authors:
Silvia Biondi,
Andrey Alexandrov,
Behcet Alpat,
Giovanni Ambrosi,
Stefano Argirò,
Rau Arteche Diaz,
Nazarm Bartosik,
Giuseppe Battistoni,
Nicola Belcari,
Elettra Bellinzona,
Maria Giuseppina Bisogni,
Graziano Bruni,
Pietro Carra,
Piergiorgio Cerello,
Esther Ciarrocchi,
Alberto Clozza,
Sofia Colombi,
Giovanni De Lellis,
Alberto Del Guerra,
Micol De Simoni,
Antonia Di Crescenzo,
Benedetto Di Ruzza,
Marco Donetti,
Yunsheng Dong,
Marco Durante
, et al. (70 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The FragmentatiOn Of Target (FOOT) experiment aims to provide precise nuclear cross-section measurements for two different fields: hadrontherapy and radio-protection in space. The main reason is the important role the nuclear fragmentation process plays in both fields, where the health risks caused by radiation are very similar and mainly attributable to the fragmentation process. The FOOT experim…
▽ More
The FragmentatiOn Of Target (FOOT) experiment aims to provide precise nuclear cross-section measurements for two different fields: hadrontherapy and radio-protection in space. The main reason is the important role the nuclear fragmentation process plays in both fields, where the health risks caused by radiation are very similar and mainly attributable to the fragmentation process. The FOOT experiment has been developed in such a way that the experimental setup is easily movable and fits the space limitations of the experimental and treatment rooms available in hadrontherapy treatment centers, where most of the data takings are carried out. The Trigger and Data Acquisition system needs to follow the same criteria and it should work in different laboratories and in different conditions. It has been designed to acquire the largest sample size with high accuracy in a controlled and online-monitored environment. The data collected are processed in real-time for quality assessment and are available to the DAQ crew and detector experts during data taking.
△ Less
Submitted 29 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
