-
Absence of concordance in a simple self-interacting neutrino cosmology
Authors:
David Camarena,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine
Abstract:
Some cosmic microwave background (CMB) data allow a cosmological scenario in which the free streaming of neutrinos is delayed until close to matter-radiation equality. Interestingly, recent analyses have revealed that large-scale structure (LSS) data also align with this scenario, discarding the possibility of an accidental feature in the CMB sky and calling for further investigation into the free…
▽ More
Some cosmic microwave background (CMB) data allow a cosmological scenario in which the free streaming of neutrinos is delayed until close to matter-radiation equality. Interestingly, recent analyses have revealed that large-scale structure (LSS) data also align with this scenario, discarding the possibility of an accidental feature in the CMB sky and calling for further investigation into the free-streaming nature of neutrinos. By assuming a simple representation of self-interacting neutrinos, we investigate whether this nonstandard scenario can accommodate a consistent cosmology for both the CMB power spectra and the large-scale distribution of galaxies simultaneously. Employing three different approaches - a profile likelihood exploration, a nested sampling method, and a heuristic Metropolis-Hasting approximation - we exhaustively explore the parameter space and demonstrate that galaxy data exacerbates the challenge already posed by the Planck polarization data for this nonstandard scenario. We find that the most conservative value of the Bayes factor disfavors the interactions among neutrinos over a $Λ$CDM + $N_\mathrm{eff}$ + $\sum m_ν$ model with odds of $23:1000$ and that the difficulty of simultaneously fitting the galaxy and CMB data relates to the so-called $S_8$ discrepancy. Our analysis not only emphasizes the need to consider a broader range of phenomenologies in the early Universe but also highlights significant numerical and theoretical challenges ahead in uncovering the exact nature of the feature observed in the data or, ultimately, confirming the standard chronological evolution of the Universe.
△ Less
Submitted 8 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
If Turing played piano with an artificial partner
Authors:
Dobromir Dotov,
Dante Camarena,
Zack Harris,
Joanna Spyra,
Pietro Gagliano,
Laurel Trainor
Abstract:
Music is an inherently social activity that allows people to share experiences and feel connected with one another. There has been little progress in designing artificial partners exhibiting a similar social experience as playing with another person. Neural network architectures that implement generative models, such as large language models, are suited for producing musical scores. Playing music…
▽ More
Music is an inherently social activity that allows people to share experiences and feel connected with one another. There has been little progress in designing artificial partners exhibiting a similar social experience as playing with another person. Neural network architectures that implement generative models, such as large language models, are suited for producing musical scores. Playing music socially, however, involves more than playing a score; it must complement the other musicians' ideas and keep time correctly. We addressed the question of whether a convincing social experience is made possible by a generative model trained to produce musical scores, not necessarily optimized for synchronization and continuation. The network, a variational autoencoder trained on a large corpus of digital scores, was adapted for a timed call-and-response task with a human partner. Participants played piano with a human or artificial partner-in various configurations-and rated the performance quality and first-person experience of self-other integration. Overall, the artificial partners held promise but were rated lower than human partners. The artificial partner with simplest design and highest similarity parameter was not rated differently from the human partners on some measures, suggesting that interactive rather than generative sophistication is important in enabling social AI.
△ Less
Submitted 9 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Constraining LLTB models with galaxy cluster counts from next generation surveys
Authors:
Ziad Sakr,
Ana Carvalho,
Antonio Da Silva,
Juan Garcia Bellido,
Jose P. Mimoso,
David Camarena,
Savvas Nesseris,
Carlos J. A. P. Martins,
Nelson J. Nunes,
Domenico Sapone
Abstract:
The Universe's assumed homogeneity and isotropy is known as the cosmological principle. It is one of the assumptions that lead to the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric and it is a cornerstone of modern cosmology, because the metric plays a crucial role into the determination of the cosmological observables. Thus, it is of paramount importance to question this principle and perform…
▽ More
The Universe's assumed homogeneity and isotropy is known as the cosmological principle. It is one of the assumptions that lead to the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric and it is a cornerstone of modern cosmology, because the metric plays a crucial role into the determination of the cosmological observables. Thus, it is of paramount importance to question this principle and perform observational tests that may falsify this hypothesis. Here we explore the use of galaxy cluster counts as a probe of a large-scale inhomogeneity, which is a novel approach for the study of inhomogeneous models, and to determine the precision with which future galaxy cluster surveys will be able to test the cosmological principle. We present forecast constraints on the inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi (LTB) model with a cosmological constant and cold dark matter, from a combination of simulated data according to a compilation of `Stage-IV' galaxy surveys following a methodology that involves the use of a mass function correction from numerical $N$-body simulations of an LTB cosmology. When considering the \lcdm fiducial model as a baseline for constructing our mock catalogs, we find that our combination of the forthcoming cluster surveys, will improve the constraints on the cosmological principle parameters as well on the FLRW parameters by about $50\%$ with respect to previous similar forecasts performed using geometrical and linear growth of structure probes, with $\pm20\%$ variations depending on the level of knowledge of systematic effects.These results indicate that galaxy cluster abundances are sensitive probes of inhomogeneity, and that next-generation galaxy cluster surveys, will thoroughly test homogeneity at cosmological scales, tightening the constraints on possible violations of the cosmological principle in the framework of $Λ$LTB scenarios. (Abridged)
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2024; v1 submitted 29 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
The two-mode puzzle: Confronting self-interacting neutrinos with the full shape of the galaxy power spectrum
Authors:
David Camarena,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
John Houghteling
Abstract:
A cosmological scenario in which the onset of neutrino free streaming in the early Universe is delayed until close to the epoch of matter-radiation equality has been shown to provide a good fit to some cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, while being somewhat disfavored by Planck CMB polarization data. To clarify this situation, we investigate in this paper CMB-independent constraints on this s…
▽ More
A cosmological scenario in which the onset of neutrino free streaming in the early Universe is delayed until close to the epoch of matter-radiation equality has been shown to provide a good fit to some cosmic microwave background (CMB) data, while being somewhat disfavored by Planck CMB polarization data. To clarify this situation, we investigate in this paper CMB-independent constraints on this scenario from the Full Shape of the galaxy power spectrum. Although this scenario predicts significant changes to the linear matter power spectrum, we find that it can provide a good fit to the galaxy power spectrum data. Interestingly, we show that the data display a modest preference for a delayed onset of neutrino free streaming over the standard model of cosmology, which is driven by the galaxy power spectrum data on mildly non-linear scales. This conclusion is supported by both profile likelihood and Bayesian exploration analyses, showing robustness of the results. Compared to the standard cosmological paradigm, this scenario predicts a significant suppression of structure on subgalactic scales. While our analysis relies on the simplest cosmological representation of neutrino self-interactions, we argue that this persistent - and somehow consistent - picture in which neutrino free streaming is delayed motivates the exploration of particle models capable of reconciling all CMB, large-scale structure, and laboratory data.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2023; v1 submitted 7 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Bayesian analysis of a Unified Dark Matter model with transition: can it alleviate the $H_{0}$ tension?
Authors:
Emmanuel Frion,
David Camarena,
Leonardo Giani,
Tays Miranda,
Daniele Bertacca,
Valerio Marra,
Oliver F. Piattella
Abstract:
We consider cosmological models in which Dark Matter (DM) and Dark Energy (DE) are described by a single component, dubbed Unified Dark Matter (UDM) models, in which the DE-like part can have an equation state $<-1$ at late times without violating the null energy condition. In this paper, we investigate whether this feature can relieve the Hubble tension. We perform a Bayesian analysis of the mode…
▽ More
We consider cosmological models in which Dark Matter (DM) and Dark Energy (DE) are described by a single component, dubbed Unified Dark Matter (UDM) models, in which the DE-like part can have an equation state $<-1$ at late times without violating the null energy condition. In this paper, we investigate whether this feature can relieve the Hubble tension. We perform a Bayesian analysis of the model using SNIa data from Pantheon, the CMB distance prior from Planck, and the prior on the absolute magnitude $M$ of SNIa from SH0ES. Using the prior, the data suggests a smooth transition taking place at redshifts $z_{\rm t} \simeq 2.85$, which provides a value $H_0=69.64\pm 0.88$ for the Hubble constant, slightly alleviating the tension by $\sim 1.5 σ$. Without it, we obtain $H_0 = 67.6^{+1.3}_{-0.82}$ and a transition happening at $z_t=1.36$. We also discuss the importance of using the prior on $M$ for constraining this model.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024; v1 submitted 12 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
The tension in the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
This study aims to elucidate the tension in the Hubble constant ($H_0$), a key metric in cosmology representing the universe's expansion rate. Conflicting results from independent measurements such as the Planck satellite mission and the SH0ES collaboration have sparked interest in exploring alternative cosmological models. We extend the analysis by SH0ES to an arbitrary cosmographic model, obtain…
▽ More
This study aims to elucidate the tension in the Hubble constant ($H_0$), a key metric in cosmology representing the universe's expansion rate. Conflicting results from independent measurements such as the Planck satellite mission and the SH0ES collaboration have sparked interest in exploring alternative cosmological models. We extend the analysis by SH0ES to an arbitrary cosmographic model, obtaining a competitive local $H_0$ determination which only assumes the standard flat $Λ$CDM model ($73.14 \pm 1.10$ km/s/Mpc), and another which only assumes the FLRW metric ($74.56 \pm 1.61$ km/s/Mpc). The study also stresses the importance of the supernova magnitude calibration ($M_B$) in cosmological inference and highlights the tension in $M_B$ when supernovae are calibrated either by CMB and BAO observations or the first two rungs of the cosmic distance ladder. This discrepancy, independent of the physics involved, suggests that models solely changing the Hubble flow and maintaining a sound horizon distance consistent with CMB, fail to explain the discrepancy between early- and late-time measurements of $H_0$.
△ Less
Submitted 5 July, 2023;
originally announced July 2023.
-
Euclid: Testing the Copernican principle with next-generation surveys
Authors:
D. Camarena,
V. Marra,
Z. Sakr,
S. Nesseris,
A. Da Silva,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
P. Fleury,
L. Lombriser,
M. Martinelli,
C. J. A. P. Martins,
J. Mimoso,
D. Sapone,
C. Clarkson,
S. Camera,
C. Carbone,
S. Casas,
S. Ilić,
V. Pettorino,
I. Tutusaus,
N. Aghanim,
B. Altieri,
A. Amara,
N. Auricchio,
M. Baldi,
D. Bonino
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The Copernican principle, the notion that we are not at a special location in the Universe, is one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology and its violation would invalidate the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, causing a major change in our understanding of the Universe. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to perform observational tests of this principle. We determine the preci…
▽ More
The Copernican principle, the notion that we are not at a special location in the Universe, is one of the cornerstones of modern cosmology and its violation would invalidate the Friedmann-Lemaître-Robertson-Walker (FLRW) metric, causing a major change in our understanding of the Universe. Thus, it is of fundamental importance to perform observational tests of this principle. We determine the precision with which future surveys will be able to test the Copernican principle and their ability to detect any possible violations. We forecast constraints on the inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant $Λ$ ($Λ$LTB), basically a cosmological constant $Λ$ and cold dark matter ($Λ$CDM) model, but endowed with a spherical inhomogeneity. We consider combinations of currently available data and simulated Euclid data, together with external data products, based on both $Λ$CDM and $Λ$LTB fiducial models. These constraints are compared to the expectations from the Copernican principle. When considering the $Λ$CDM fiducial model, we find that Euclid data, in combination with other current and forthcoming surveys, will improve the constraints on the Copernican principle by about $30\%$, with $\pm10\%$ variations depending on the observables and scales considered. On the other hand, when considering a $Λ$LTB fiducial model, we find that future Euclid data, combined with other current and forthcoming data sets, will be able to detect Gpc-scale inhomogeneities of contrast $-0.1$. Next-generation surveys, such as Euclid, will thoroughly test homogeneity at large scales, tightening the constraints on possible violations of the Copernican principle.
△ Less
Submitted 21 October, 2022; v1 submitted 20 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
-
A void in the Hubble tension? The end of the line for the Hubble bubble
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra,
Ziad Sakr,
Chris Clarkson
Abstract:
The Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities beyond the standard paradigm, implying that statistical homogeneity and isotropy may be reached only on much larger scales than the usually assumed $\sim$100 Mpc. This means that we are not necessarily typical observers and that the Copernican principle could be recovered only on super-Hubble scales. Here, we do not assume the validity of the Co…
▽ More
The Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities beyond the standard paradigm, implying that statistical homogeneity and isotropy may be reached only on much larger scales than the usually assumed $\sim$100 Mpc. This means that we are not necessarily typical observers and that the Copernican principle could be recovered only on super-Hubble scales. Here, we do not assume the validity of the Copernican principle and let Cosmic Microwave Background, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations, type Ia supernovae, local $H_0$, cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich observations constrain the geometrical degrees of freedom of the local structure, which we parametrize via the $Λ$LTB model -- basically a non-linear radial perturbation of a FLRW metric. In order to quantify if a non-Copernican structure could explain away the Hubble tension, we pay careful attention to computing the Hubble constant in an inhomogeneous universe, and we adopt model selection via both the Bayes factor and the Akaike information criterion. Our results show that, while the $Λ$LTB model can successfully explain away the $H_0$ tension, it is favored with respect to the $Λ$CDM model only if one solely considers supernovae in the redshift range that is used to fit the Hubble constant, that is, $0.023<z<0.15$. If one considers all the supernova sample, then the $H_0$ tension is not solved and the support for the $Λ$LTB model vanishes. Combined with other data sets, this solution to the Hubble tension barely helps. Finally, we have reconstructed our local spacetime. We have found that data are best fit by a shallow void with $δ_L \approx -0.04$ and $r^{\mathrm{out}}_L \approx 300$ Mpc, which, interestingly, lies on the border of the 95\% credible region relative to the standard model expectation.
△ Less
Submitted 8 August, 2022; v1 submitted 11 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
Authors:
Elcio Abdalla,
Guillermo Franco Abellán,
Amin Aboubrahim,
Adriano Agnello,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yashar Akrami,
George Alestas,
Daniel Aloni,
Luca Amendola,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Richard I. Anderson,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Vernon Barger,
Spyros Basilakos,
Ronaldo C. Batista,
Elia S. Battistelli,
Richard Battye,
Micol Benetti,
David Benisty,
Asher Berlin,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Emanuele Berti,
Bohdan Bidenko
, et al. (178 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of system…
▽ More
In this paper we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances between the different cosmological probes, such as the disagreement in the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$, the $σ_8$--$S_8$ tension, and other less statistically significant anomalies. While these discordances can still be in part the result of systematic errors, their persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the necessity for new physics or generalisations beyond the standard model. In this paper, we focus on the $5.0\,σ$ tension between the {\it Planck} CMB estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we list a few interesting new physics models that could alleviate this tension and discuss how the next decade's experiments will be crucial. Moreover, we focus on the tension of the {\it Planck} CMB data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models proposed for alleviating this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit a full array of data with a single model and not just one parameter at a time. Additionally, we present a wide range of other less discussed anomalies at a statistical significance level lower than the $H_0$--$S_8$ tensions which may also constitute hints towards new physics, and we discuss possible generic theoretical approaches that can collectively explain the non-standard nature of these signals.[Abridged]
△ Less
Submitted 24 April, 2022; v1 submitted 11 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
The BEHOMO project: $Λ$LTB $N$-body simulations
Authors:
V. Marra,
T. Castro,
D. Camarena,
S. Borgani,
A. Ragagnin
Abstract:
Our Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities and anisotropies which cannot be explained by the standard model of cosmology, that is, the homogeneous and isotropic FLRW metric, on which the $Λ$CDM model is built, may not describe accurately observations. Currently, there is not a satisfactory understanding of the evolution of the large-scale structure on an inhomogeneous background. We star…
▽ More
Our Universe may feature large-scale inhomogeneities and anisotropies which cannot be explained by the standard model of cosmology, that is, the homogeneous and isotropic FLRW metric, on which the $Λ$CDM model is built, may not describe accurately observations. Currently, there is not a satisfactory understanding of the evolution of the large-scale structure on an inhomogeneous background. We start the cosmology beyond homogeneity and isotropy (BEHOMO) project and study the inhomogeneous $Λ$LTB model with the methods of numerical cosmology. Understanding the evolution of the large-scale structure is a necessary step to constrain inhomogeneous models with present and future observables and place the standard model on more solid grounds. We perform Newtonian $N$-body simulations, whose accuracy in describing the background evolution is checked against the general relativistic solution. The large-scale structure of the corresponding $Λ$CDM simulation is also validated. We obtain the first set of simulations of the $Λ$LTB model ever produced. The data products consist of 11 snapshots between redshift 0 and 3.7 for each of the 68 simulations that have been performed, together with halo catalogs and lens planes relative to 21 snapshots, between redshift 0 and 4.2, for a total of approximately 180 TB of data. We plan to study the growth of perturbations at the linear and nonlinear level, gravitational lensing, cluster abundances and proprieties. Data can be obtained upon request. Further information is available at valerio-marra.github.io/BEHOMO-project .
△ Less
Submitted 31 May, 2022; v1 submitted 8 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Malakai: Music That Adapts to the Shape of Emotions
Authors:
Zack Harris,
Liam Atticus Clarke,
Pietro Gagliano,
Dante Camarena,
Manal Siddiqui,
Pablo S. Castro
Abstract:
The advent of ML music models such as Google Magenta's MusicVAE now allow us to extract and replicate compositional features from otherwise complex datasets. These models allow computational composers to parameterize abstract variables such as style and mood. By leveraging these models and combining them with procedural algorithms from the last few decades, it is possible to create a dynamic song…
▽ More
The advent of ML music models such as Google Magenta's MusicVAE now allow us to extract and replicate compositional features from otherwise complex datasets. These models allow computational composers to parameterize abstract variables such as style and mood. By leveraging these models and combining them with procedural algorithms from the last few decades, it is possible to create a dynamic song that composes music in real-time to accompany interactive experiences. Malakai is a tool that helps users of varying skill levels create, listen to, remix and share such dynamic songs. Using Malakai, a Composer can create a dynamic song that can be interacted with by a Listener
△ Less
Submitted 3 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Euclid: Forecast constraints on consistency tests of the $Λ$CDM model
Authors:
S. Nesseris,
D. Sapone,
M. Martinelli,
D. Camarena,
V. Marra,
Z. Sakr,
J. Garcia-Bellido,
C. J. A. P. Martins,
C. Clarkson,
A. Da Silva,
P. Fleury,
L. Lombriser,
J. P. Mimoso,
S. Casas,
V. Pettorino,
I. Tutusaus,
A. Amara,
N. Auricchio,
C. Bodendorf,
D. Bonino,
E. Branchini,
M. Brescia,
V. Capobianco,
C. Carbone,
J. Carretero
, et al. (90 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard cosmological model is based on the fundamental assumptions of a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe on large scales. An observational detection of a violation of these assumptions at any redshift would immediately indicate the presence of new physics. We quantify the ability of the Euclid mission, together with contemporary surveys, to improve the current sensitivity of null…
▽ More
The standard cosmological model is based on the fundamental assumptions of a spatially homogeneous and isotropic universe on large scales. An observational detection of a violation of these assumptions at any redshift would immediately indicate the presence of new physics. We quantify the ability of the Euclid mission, together with contemporary surveys, to improve the current sensitivity of null tests of the canonical cosmological constant $Λ$ and the cold dark matter (LCDM) model in the redshift range $0<z<1.8$. We considered both currently available data and simulated Euclid and external data products based on a LCDM fiducial model, an evolving dark energy model assuming the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parameterization or an inhomogeneous Lemaître-Tolman-Bondi model with a cosmological constant $Λ$ (LLTB), and carried out two separate but complementary analyses: a machine learning reconstruction of the null tests based on genetic algorithms, and a theory-agnostic parametric approach based on Taylor expansion and binning of the data, in order to avoid assumptions about any particular model. We find that in combination with external probes, Euclid can improve current constraints on null tests of the LCDM by approximately a factor of three when using the machine learning approach and by a further factor of two in the case of the parametric approach. However, we also find that in certain cases, the parametric approach may be biased against or missing some features of models far from LCDM. Our analysis highlights the importance of synergies between Euclid and other surveys. These synergies are crucial for providing tighter constraints over an extended redshift range for a plethora of different consistency tests of some of the main assumptions of the current cosmological paradigm.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2022; v1 submitted 21 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
Late-transition vs smooth $H(z)$ deformation models for the resolution of the Hubble crisis
Authors:
George Alestas,
David Camarena,
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Lavrentios Kazantzidis,
Valerio Marra,
Savvas Nesseris,
Leandros Perivolaropoulos
Abstract:
Gravitational transitions at low redshifts ($z_t<0.1$) have been recently proposed as a solution to the Hubble and growth tensions. Such transitions would naturally lead to a transition in the absolute magnitude $M$ of type Ia supernovae (SnIa) at $z_t$ (Late $M$ Transitions - $LMT$) and possibly in the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ (Late $w-M$ Transitions - $LwMT$). Here, we compare…
▽ More
Gravitational transitions at low redshifts ($z_t<0.1$) have been recently proposed as a solution to the Hubble and growth tensions. Such transitions would naturally lead to a transition in the absolute magnitude $M$ of type Ia supernovae (SnIa) at $z_t$ (Late $M$ Transitions - $LMT$) and possibly in the dark energy equation of state parameter $w$ (Late $w-M$ Transitions - $LwMT$). Here, we compare the quality of fit to cosmological data of this class of models, with the corresponding quality of fit of the cosmological constant model ($Λ$CDM) and some of the best smooth $H(z)$ deformation models ($w$CDM, CPL, PEDE). We also perform model selection via the Akaike Information Criterion and the Bayes factor. We use the full CMB temperature anisotropy spectrum data, the baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) data, the Pantheon SnIa data, the SnIa absolute magnitude $M$ as determined by Cepheid calibrators and the value of the Hubble constant $H_0$ as determined by local SnIa calibrated using Cepheids. We find that smooth $H(z)$ deformation models perform worse than transition models for the following reasons: 1) They have a worse fit to low-$z$ geometric probes (BAO and SnIa data); 2) They favor values of the SnIa absolute magnitude $M$ that are lower as compared to the value $M_c$ obtained with local Cepheid calibrators at $z<0.01$; 3) They tend to worsen the $Ω_\mathrm{m,0}-σ_\mathrm{8,0}$ growth tension. We also find that the $w-M$ transition model ($LwMT$) does not provide a better quality of fit to cosmological data than a pure $M$ transition model ($LMT$) where $w$ is fixed to the \lcdm value $w=-1$ at all redshifts. We conclude that the $LMT$ model has significant statistical advantages over smooth late-time $H(z)$ deformation models in addressing the Hubble crisis.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2022; v1 submitted 8 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
The Copernican principle in light of the latest cosmological data
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra,
Ziad Sakr,
Chris Clarkson
Abstract:
We pursue a program to confront observations with inhomogeneous extensions of the FLRW metric. The main idea is to test the Copernican principle rather than assuming it a priori. We consider the $Λ$CDM model endowed with a spherical $Λ$LTB inhomogeneity around us, that is, we assume isotropy and test the hypothesis of homogeneity. We confront the $Λ$LTB model with the latest available data from CM…
▽ More
We pursue a program to confront observations with inhomogeneous extensions of the FLRW metric. The main idea is to test the Copernican principle rather than assuming it a priori. We consider the $Λ$CDM model endowed with a spherical $Λ$LTB inhomogeneity around us, that is, we assume isotropy and test the hypothesis of homogeneity. We confront the $Λ$LTB model with the latest available data from CMB, BAO, type Ia supernovae, local $H_0$, cosmic chronometers, Compton y-distortion and kinetic Sunyaev-Zeldovich effect. We find that these data can constrain tightly this extra inhomogeneity, almost to the cosmic variance level: on scales $\gtrsim 100$ Mpc structures can have a small non-Copernican effective contrast of just $δ_L \sim 0.01$. Furthermore, the constraints on the standard $Λ$CDM parameters are not weakened after marginalizing over the parameters that model the local structure, to which we assign ignorance priors. In other words, dropping the Copernican principle assumption does not imply worse constraints on the cosmological parameters. This positive result confirms that the present and future data can be meaningfully analyzed within the framework of inhomogeneous cosmology.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2021; v1 submitted 5 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
On the use of the local prior on the absolute magnitude of Type Ia supernovae in cosmological inference
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
A dark-energy which behaves as the cosmological constant until a sudden phantom transition at very-low redshift ($z<0.1$) seems to solve the >4$σ$ disagreement between the local and high-redshift determinations of the Hubble constant, while maintaining the phenomenological success of the $Λ$CDM model with respect to the other observables. Here, we show that such a hockey-stick dark energy cannot s…
▽ More
A dark-energy which behaves as the cosmological constant until a sudden phantom transition at very-low redshift ($z<0.1$) seems to solve the >4$σ$ disagreement between the local and high-redshift determinations of the Hubble constant, while maintaining the phenomenological success of the $Λ$CDM model with respect to the other observables. Here, we show that such a hockey-stick dark energy cannot solve the $H_0$ crisis. The basic reason is that the supernova absolute magnitude $M_B$ that is used to derive the local $H_0$ constraint is not compatible with the $M_B$ that is necessary to fit supernova, BAO and CMB data, and this disagreement is not solved by a sudden phantom transition at very-low redshift. We make use of this example to show why it is preferable to adopt in the statistical analyses the prior on $M_B$ as an alternative to the prior on $H_0$. The three reasons are: i) one avoids potential double counting of low-redshift supernovae, ii) one avoids assuming the validity of cosmography, in particular fixing the deceleration parameter to the standard model value $q_0=-0.55$, iii) one includes in the analysis the fact that $M_B$ is constrained by local calibration, an information which would otherwise be neglected in the analysis, biasing both model selection and parameter constraints. We provide the priors on $M_B$ relative to the recent Pantheon and DES-SN3YR supernova catalogs. We also provide a Gaussian joint prior on $H_0$ and $q_0$ that generalizes the prior on $H_0$ by SH0ES.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2021; v1 submitted 21 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Cosmology Intertwined IV: The Age of the Universe and its Curvature
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (66 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
A precise measurement of the curvature of the Universe is of primeval importance for cosmology since it could not only confirm the paradigm of primordial inflation but also help in discriminating between different early Universe scenarios. The recent observations, while broadly consistent with a spatially flat standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model, are showing tensions that still allow (and…
▽ More
A precise measurement of the curvature of the Universe is of primeval importance for cosmology since it could not only confirm the paradigm of primordial inflation but also help in discriminating between different early Universe scenarios. The recent observations, while broadly consistent with a spatially flat standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter ($Λ$CDM) model, are showing tensions that still allow (and, in some cases, even suggest) a few percent deviations from a flat universe. In particular, the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background power spectra, assuming the nominal likelihood, prefer a closed universe at more than 99\% confidence level. While new physics could be in action, this anomaly may be the result of an unresolved systematic error or just a statistical fluctuation. However, since a positive curvature allows a larger age of the Universe, an accurate determination of the age of the oldest objects provides a smoking gun in confirming or falsifying the current flat $Λ$CDM model.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined III: $f σ_8$ and $S_8$
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides a wonderful fit to current cosmological data, but a few tensions and anomalies became statistically significant with the latest data analyses. While these anomalies could be due to the presence of systematic errors in the experiments, they could also indicate the need for new physics beyond the standard model. In this Letter of Interest…
▽ More
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides a wonderful fit to current cosmological data, but a few tensions and anomalies became statistically significant with the latest data analyses. While these anomalies could be due to the presence of systematic errors in the experiments, they could also indicate the need for new physics beyond the standard model. In this Letter of Interest we focus on the tension of the Planck data with weak lensing measurements and redshift surveys, about the value of the matter energy density $Ω_m$, and the amplitude or rate of the growth of structure ($σ_8,fσ_8$). We list a few interesting models for solving this tension, and we discuss the importance of trying to fit with a single model a full array of data and not just one parameter at a time.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined II: The Hubble Constant Tension
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (68 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, that has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in portion the result of sys…
▽ More
The current cosmological probes have provided a fantastic confirmation of the standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model, that has been constrained with unprecedented accuracy. However, with the increase of the experimental sensitivity a few statistically significant tensions between different independent cosmological datasets emerged. While these tensions can be in portion the result of systematic errors, the persistence after several years of accurate analysis strongly hints at cracks in the standard cosmological scenario and the need for new physics. In this Letter of Interest we will focus on the $4.4σ$ tension between the Planck estimate of the Hubble constant $H_0$ and the SH0ES collaboration measurements. After showing the $H_0$ evaluations made from different teams using different methods and geometric calibrations, we will list a few interesting new physics models that could solve this tension and discuss how the next decade experiments will be crucial.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Cosmology Intertwined I: Perspectives for the Next Decade
Authors:
Eleonora Di Valentino,
Luis A. Anchordoqui,
Ozgur Akarsu,
Yacine Ali-Haimoud,
Luca Amendola,
Nikki Arendse,
Marika Asgari,
Mario Ballardini,
Spyros Basilakos,
Elia Battistelli,
Micol Benetti,
Simon Birrer,
François R. Bouchet,
Marco Bruni,
Erminia Calabrese,
David Camarena,
Salvatore Capozziello,
Angela Chen,
Jens Chluba,
Anton Chudaykin,
Eoin Ó Colgáin,
Francis-Yan Cyr-Racine,
Paolo de Bernardis,
Javier de Cruz Pérez,
Jacques Delabrouille
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides an amazing description of a wide range of astrophysical and astronomical data. However, there are a few big open questions, that make the standard model look like a first-order approximation to a more realistic scenario that still needs to be fully understood. In this Letter of Interest we will list a few important goals that need to be…
▽ More
The standard $Λ$ Cold Dark Matter cosmological model provides an amazing description of a wide range of astrophysical and astronomical data. However, there are a few big open questions, that make the standard model look like a first-order approximation to a more realistic scenario that still needs to be fully understood. In this Letter of Interest we will list a few important goals that need to be addressed in the next decade, also taking into account the current discordances present between the different cosmological probes, as the Hubble constant $H_0$ value, the $σ_8 - S_8$ tension, and the anomalies present in the Planck results. Finally, we will give an overview of upgraded experiments and next-generation space-missions and facilities on Earth, that will be of crucial importance to address all these questions.
△ Less
Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 25 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
An overview of the balanced excited random walk
Authors:
Daniel Camarena,
Gonzalo Panizo,
Alejandro F. Ramírez
Abstract:
The balanced excited random walk, introduced by Benjamini, Kozma and Schapira in $2011$, is defined as a discrete time stochastic process in $\mathbb Z^d$, depending on two integer parameters $1\le d_1,d_2\le d$, which whenever it is at a site $x\in\mathbb Z^d$ at time $n$, it jumps to $x\pm e_i$ with uniform probability, where $e_1,\ldots,e_d$ are the canonical vectors, for $1\le i\le d_1$, if th…
▽ More
The balanced excited random walk, introduced by Benjamini, Kozma and Schapira in $2011$, is defined as a discrete time stochastic process in $\mathbb Z^d$, depending on two integer parameters $1\le d_1,d_2\le d$, which whenever it is at a site $x\in\mathbb Z^d$ at time $n$, it jumps to $x\pm e_i$ with uniform probability, where $e_1,\ldots,e_d$ are the canonical vectors, for $1\le i\le d_1$, if the site $x$ was visited for the first time at time $n$, while it jumps to $x\pm e_i$ with uniform probability, for $1+d-d_2\le i\le d$, if the site $x$ was already visited before time $n$. Here we give an overview of this model when $d_1+d_2=d$ and introduce and study the cases when $d_1+d_2>d$. In particular, we prove that for all the cases $d\ge 5$ and most cases $d=4$, the balanced excited random walk is transient.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2020; v1 submitted 13 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
A new method to build the (inverse) distance ladder
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
The cosmic distance ladder is the succession of techniques by which it is possible to determine distances to astronomical objects. Here, we present a new method to build the cosmic distance ladder, going from local astrophysical measurements to the CMB. Instead of relying on high-redshift cosmography in order to model the luminosity-distance relation and calibrate supernovae with BAO, we exploit d…
▽ More
The cosmic distance ladder is the succession of techniques by which it is possible to determine distances to astronomical objects. Here, we present a new method to build the cosmic distance ladder, going from local astrophysical measurements to the CMB. Instead of relying on high-redshift cosmography in order to model the luminosity-distance relation and calibrate supernovae with BAO, we exploit directly the distance-duality relation $d_L = (1+z)^2 d_A$---valid if photon number is conserved and gravity is described by a metric theory. The advantage is that the results will not depend on the parametrization of the luminosity-distance relation at $z>0.15$: no model is adopted in order to calibrate BAO with supernovae. This method yields local measurements of the Hubble constant and deceleration parameter. Furthermore, it can directly assess the impact of BAO observations on the strong 4--5$σ$ tension between local and global $H_0$. Using the latest supernova, BAO and CMB observations, we found a consistently low value of $q_0$ and strong inconsistency between angular-only BAO constraints and anisotropic BAO measurements, which are, or not, in agreement with CMB depending on the kind of analysis (see Table~$4$). We conclude that, in order to understand the reasons behind the $H_0$ crisis, a first step should be clarifying the tension between angular and perpendicular anisotropic BAO as this will help understanding if new physics is required at the pre-recombination epoch or/and during the dark energy era.
△ Less
Submitted 17 March, 2020; v1 submitted 30 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Local determination of the Hubble constant and the deceleration parameter
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
The determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from the Cosmic Microwave Background by the Planck Collaboration [Aghanim et al. 2018] is in tension at $4.2σ$ with respect to the local determination of $H_0$ by the SH0ES collaboration [Reid et al. 2019]. Here, we improve upon the local determination, which fixes the deceleration parameter to the standard $Λ$CDM model value of $q_0=-0.55$, that is,…
▽ More
The determination of the Hubble constant $H_0$ from the Cosmic Microwave Background by the Planck Collaboration [Aghanim et al. 2018] is in tension at $4.2σ$ with respect to the local determination of $H_0$ by the SH0ES collaboration [Reid et al. 2019]. Here, we improve upon the local determination, which fixes the deceleration parameter to the standard $Λ$CDM model value of $q_0=-0.55$, that is, uses information from observations beyond the local universe. First, we derive the effective calibration prior on the absolute magnitude $M_B$ of Supernovae Ia, which can be used in cosmological analyses in order to avoid the double counting of low-redshift supernovae. We find $M_B = -19.2334 \pm 0.0404$ mag. Then, we use the above $M_B$ prior in order to obtain a determination of the local $H_0$ which only uses local observations and only assumes the cosmological principle, that is, large-scale homogeneity and isotropy. This is achieved by adopting an uninformative flat prior for $q_0$ in the cosmographic expansion of the luminosity distance. We use the latest Pantheon sample and find $H_0= 75.35 \pm 1.68 \text{ km s}^{-1} {\rm Mpc}^{-1}$, which features a 2.2% uncertainty, close to the 1.9% error obtained by the SH0ES Collaboration. Our determination is at the higher tension of $4.5σ$ with the latest results from the Planck Collaboration that assume the $Λ$CDM model. Furthermore, we also constrain the deceleration parameter to $q_0= -1.08 \pm 0.29$, which disagrees with Planck at the $1.9σ$ level. These estimations only use supernovae in the redshift range $0.023\le z\le 0.15$.
△ Less
Submitted 28 November, 2019; v1 submitted 27 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
-
The impact of the cosmic variance on $H_0$ on cosmological analyses
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
The current $3.8 σ$ tension between local (arXiv:1804.10655) and global (arXiv:1605.02985) measurements of $H_0$ cannot be fully explained by the concordance $Λ$CDM model. It could be produced by unknown systematics or by physics beyond the standard model. On the other hand, it is well known that linear perturbation theory predicts a cosmic variance on the Hubble parameter $H_0$, which leads to sy…
▽ More
The current $3.8 σ$ tension between local (arXiv:1804.10655) and global (arXiv:1605.02985) measurements of $H_0$ cannot be fully explained by the concordance $Λ$CDM model. It could be produced by unknown systematics or by physics beyond the standard model. On the other hand, it is well known that linear perturbation theory predicts a cosmic variance on the Hubble parameter $H_0$, which leads to systematic errors on its local determination. Here, we study how including in the likelihood the cosmic variance on $H_0$ affects statistical inference. In particular we consider the $γ$CDM, $w$CDM and $γw$CDM parametric extensions of the standard model, which we constrain with the latest CMB, BAO, SNe Ia, RSD and $H_0$ data. We learn two important lessons. First, the systematic error from cosmic variance is - independently of the model - approximately $σ_{\text{cv}}\approx 0.88$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (1.2\% $H_0^{\text{loc}}$) when considering the redshift range $0.0233 \le z \le 0.15$, which is relative to the main analysis of (arXiv:1804.10655), and $σ_{\text{cv}}\approx 1.5$ km s$^{-1}$ Mpc$^{-1}$ (2.1\% $H_0^{\text{loc}}$) when considering the wider redshift range $0.01 \le z \le 0.15$. Although $σ_{\text{cv}}$ affects the total error budget on local $H_0$, it does not significantly alleviate the tension which remains at $\approx 3 σ$. Second, cosmic variance, besides shifting the constraints, can change the results of model selection: much of the statistical advantage of non-standard models is to alleviate the now-reduced tension. We conclude that, when constraining non-standard models it is important to include the cosmic variance on $H_0$ if one wants to use the local determination of the Hubble constant by Riess et al. (arXiv:1804.10655). Doing the contrary could potentially bias the conclusions.
△ Less
Submitted 16 July, 2018; v1 submitted 24 May, 2018;
originally announced May 2018.
-
Cosmological constraints on the radiation released during structure formation
Authors:
David Camarena,
Valerio Marra
Abstract:
During the process of structure formation in the universe matter is converted into radiation through a variety of processes such as light from stars, infrared radiation from cosmic dust and gravitational waves from binary black holes/neutron stars and supernova explosions. The production of this astrophysical radiation background (ARB) could affect the expansion rate of the universe and the growth…
▽ More
During the process of structure formation in the universe matter is converted into radiation through a variety of processes such as light from stars, infrared radiation from cosmic dust and gravitational waves from binary black holes/neutron stars and supernova explosions. The production of this astrophysical radiation background (ARB) could affect the expansion rate of the universe and the growth of perturbations. Here, we aim at understanding to which level one can constraint the ARB using future cosmological observations. We model the energy transfer from matter to radiation through an effective interaction between matter and astrophysical radiation. Using future supernova data from LSST and growth-rate data from Euclid we find that the ARB density parameter is constrained, at the 95% confidence level, to be $Ω_{ar_0}<0.008$. Estimates of the energy density produced by well-known astrophysical processes give roughly $Ω_{ar_0}\sim 10^{-5}$. Therefore, we conclude that cosmological observations will only be able to constrain exotic or not-well understood sources of radiation.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2016; v1 submitted 31 August, 2016;
originally announced August 2016.
