Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: Adams, J N

OCEL (Object-Centric Event Log) 2.0 Specification

Authors: Alessandro Berti, Istvan Koren, Jan Niklas Adams, Gyunam Park, Benedikt Knopp, Nina Graves, Majid Rafiei, Lukas Liß, Leah Tacke Genannt Unterberg, Yisong Zhang, Christopher Schwanen, Marco Pegoraro, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Object-Centric Event Logs (OCELs) form the basis for Object-Centric Process Mining (OCPM). OCEL 1.0 was first released in 2020 and triggered the development of a range of OCPM techniques. OCEL 2.0 forms the new, more expressive standard, allowing for more extensive process analyses while remaining in an easily exchangeable format. In contrast to the first OCEL standard, it can depict changes in ob… ▽ More Object-Centric Event Logs (OCELs) form the basis for Object-Centric Process Mining (OCPM). OCEL 1.0 was first released in 2020 and triggered the development of a range of OCPM techniques. OCEL 2.0 forms the new, more expressive standard, allowing for more extensive process analyses while remaining in an easily exchangeable format. In contrast to the first OCEL standard, it can depict changes in objects, provide information on object relationships, and qualify these relationships to other objects or specific events. Compared to XES, it is more expressive, less complicated, and better readable. OCEL 2.0 offers three exchange formats: a relational database (SQLite), XML, and JSON format. This OCEL 2.0 specification document provides an introduction to the standard, its metamodel, and its exchange formats, aimed at practitioners and researchers alike. △ Less

Submitted 4 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Discovering High-Quality Process Models Despite Data Scarcity

Authors: Jan Niklas Adams, Jari Peeperkorn, Tobias Brockhoff, Isabelle Terrier, Heiko Göhner, Merih Seran Uysal, Seppe vanden Broucke, Jochen De Weerdt, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Process discovery algorithms learn process models from executed activity sequences, describing concurrency, causality, and conflict. Concurrent activities require observing multiple permutations, increasing data requirements, especially for processes with concurrent subprocesses such as hierarchical, composite, or distributed processes. While process discovery algorithms traditionally use sequence… ▽ More Process discovery algorithms learn process models from executed activity sequences, describing concurrency, causality, and conflict. Concurrent activities require observing multiple permutations, increasing data requirements, especially for processes with concurrent subprocesses such as hierarchical, composite, or distributed processes. While process discovery algorithms traditionally use sequences of activities as input, recently introduced object-centric process discovery algorithms can use graphs of activities as input, encoding partial orders between activities. As such, they contain the concurrency information of many sequences in a single graph. In this paper, we address the research question of reducing process discovery data requirements when using object-centric event logs for process discovery. We classify different real-life processes according to the control-flow complexity within and between subprocesses and introduce an evaluation framework to assess process discovery algorithm quality of traditional and object-centric process discovery based on the sample size. We complement this with a large-scale production process case study. Our results show reduced data requirements, enabling the discovery of large, concurrent processes such as manufacturing with little data, previously infeasible with traditional process discovery. Our findings suggest that object-centric process mining could revolutionize process discovery in various sectors, including manufacturing and supply chains. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Object-Centric Alignments

Authors: Lukas Liss, Jan Niklas Adams, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Processes tend to interact with other processes and operate on various objects of different types. These objects can influence each other creating dependencies between sub-processes. Analyzing the conformance of such complex processes challenges traditional conformance-checking approaches because they assume a single-case identifier for a process. To create a single-case identifier one has to flat… ▽ More Processes tend to interact with other processes and operate on various objects of different types. These objects can influence each other creating dependencies between sub-processes. Analyzing the conformance of such complex processes challenges traditional conformance-checking approaches because they assume a single-case identifier for a process. To create a single-case identifier one has to flatten complex processes. This leads to information loss when separating the processes that interact on some objects. This paper introduces an alignment approach that operates directly on these object-centric processes. We introduce alignments that can give behavior-based insights into how closely related the event data generated by a process and the behavior specified by an object-centric Petri net are. The contributions of this paper include a definition for object-centric alignments, an algorithm to compute them, a publicly available implementation, and a qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The qualitative evaluation shows that object-centric alignments can give better insights into object-centric processes because they correctly consider inter-object dependencies. Findings from the quantitative evaluation show that the run-time grows exponentially with the number of objects, the length of the process execution, and the cost of the alignment. The evaluation results motivate future research to improve the run-time and make object-centric alignments more applicable for larger processes. △ Less

Submitted 8 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

A Framework for Extracting and Encoding Features from Object-Centric Event Data

Authors: Jan Niklas Adams, Gyunam Park, Sergej Levich, Daniel Schuster, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Traditional process mining techniques take event data as input where each event is associated with exactly one object. An object represents the instantiation of a process. Object-centric event data contain events associated with multiple objects expressing the interaction of multiple processes. As traditional process mining techniques assume events associated with exactly one object, these techniq… ▽ More Traditional process mining techniques take event data as input where each event is associated with exactly one object. An object represents the instantiation of a process. Object-centric event data contain events associated with multiple objects expressing the interaction of multiple processes. As traditional process mining techniques assume events associated with exactly one object, these techniques cannot be applied to object-centric event data. To use traditional process mining techniques, the object-centric event data are flattened by removing all object references but one. The flattening process is lossy, leading to inaccurate features extracted from flattened data. Furthermore, the graph-like structure of object-centric event data is lost when flattening. In this paper, we introduce a general framework for extracting and encoding features from object-centric event data. We calculate features natively on the object-centric event data, leading to accurate measures. Furthermore, we provide three encodings for these features: tabular, sequential, and graph-based. While tabular and sequential encodings have been heavily used in process mining, the graph-based encoding is a new technique preserving the structure of the object-centric event data. We provide six use cases: a visualization and a prediction use case for each of the three encodings. We use explainable AI in the prediction use cases to show the utility of both the object-centric features and the structure of the sequential and graph-based encoding for a predictive model. △ Less

Submitted 2 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Defining Cases and Variants for Object-Centric Event Data

Authors: Jan Niklas Adams, Daniel Schuster, Seth Schmitz, Günther Schuh, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: The execution of processes leaves traces of event data in information systems. These event data can be analyzed through process mining techniques. For traditional process mining techniques, one has to associate each event with exactly one object, e.g., the company's customer. Events related to one object form an event sequence called a case. A case describes an end-to-end run through a process. Th… ▽ More The execution of processes leaves traces of event data in information systems. These event data can be analyzed through process mining techniques. For traditional process mining techniques, one has to associate each event with exactly one object, e.g., the company's customer. Events related to one object form an event sequence called a case. A case describes an end-to-end run through a process. The cases contained in event data can be used to discover a process model, detect frequent bottlenecks, or learn predictive models. However, events encountered in real-life information systems, e.g., ERP systems, can often be associated with multiple objects. The traditional sequential case concept falls short of these object-centric event data as these data exhibit a graph structure. One might force object-centric event data into the traditional case concept by flattening it. However, flattening manipulates the data and removes information. Therefore, a concept analogous to the case concept of traditional event logs is necessary to enable the application of different process mining tasks on object-centric event data. In this paper, we introduce the case concept for object-centric process mining: process executions. These are graph-based generalizations of cases as considered in traditional process mining. Furthermore, we provide techniques to extract process executions. Based on these executions, we determine equivalent process behavior with respect to an attribute using graph isomorphism. Equivalent process executions with respect to the event's activity are object-centric variants, i.e., a generalization of variants in traditional process mining. We provide a visualization technique for object-centric variants. The contribution's scalability and efficiency are extensively evaluated. Furthermore, we provide a case study showing the most frequent object-centric variants of a real-life event log. △ Less

Submitted 5 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

OPerA: Object-Centric Performance Analysis

Authors: Gyunam Park, Jan Niklas Adams, Wil. M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Performance analysis in process mining aims to provide insights on the performance of a business process by using a process model as a formal representation of the process. Such insights are reliably interpreted by process analysts in the context of a model with formal semantics. Existing techniques for performance analysis assume that a single case notion exists in a business process (e.g., a pat… ▽ More Performance analysis in process mining aims to provide insights on the performance of a business process by using a process model as a formal representation of the process. Such insights are reliably interpreted by process analysts in the context of a model with formal semantics. Existing techniques for performance analysis assume that a single case notion exists in a business process (e.g., a patient in healthcare process). However, in reality, different objects might interact (e.g., order, item, delivery, and invoice in an O2C process). In such a setting, traditional techniques may yield misleading or even incorrect insights on performance metrics such as waiting time. More importantly, by considering the interaction between objects, we can define object-centric performance metrics such as synchronization time, pooling time, and lagging time. In this work, we propose a novel approach to performance analysis considering multiple case notions by using object-centric Petri nets as formal representations of business processes. The proposed approach correctly computes existing performance metrics, while supporting the derivation of newly-introduced object-centric performance metrics. We have implemented the approach as a web application and conducted a case study based on a real-life loan application process. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2022; v1 submitted 22 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Journal ref: LNCS 13607 (2022) 281-292

Precision and Fitness in Object-Centric Process Mining

Authors: Jan Niklas Adams, Wil M. P. van der Aalst

Abstract: Traditional process mining considers only one single case notion and discovers and analyzes models based on this. However, a single case notion is often not a realistic assumption in practice. Multiple case notions might interact and influence each other in a process. Object-centric process mining introduces the techniques and concepts to handle multiple case notions. So far, such event logs have… ▽ More Traditional process mining considers only one single case notion and discovers and analyzes models based on this. However, a single case notion is often not a realistic assumption in practice. Multiple case notions might interact and influence each other in a process. Object-centric process mining introduces the techniques and concepts to handle multiple case notions. So far, such event logs have been standardized and novel process model discovery techniques were proposed. However, notions for evaluating the quality of a model are missing. These are necessary to enable future research on improving object-centric discovery and providing an objective evaluation of model quality. In this paper, we introduce a notion for the precision and fitness of an object-centric Petri net with respect to an object-centric event log. We give a formal definition and accompany this with an example. Furthermore, we provide an algorithm to calculate these quality measures. We discuss our precision and fitness notion based on an event log with different models. Our precision and fitness notions are an appropriate way to generalize quality measures to the object-centric setting since we are able to consider multiple case notions, their dependencies and their interactions. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

A Framework for Explainable Concept Drift Detection in Process Mining

Authors: Jan Niklas Adams, Sebastiaan J. van Zelst, Lara Quack, Kathrin Hausmann, Wil M. P. van der Aalst, Thomas Rose

Abstract: Rapidly changing business environments expose companies to high levels of uncertainty. This uncertainty manifests itself in significant changes that tend to occur over the lifetime of a process and possibly affect its performance. It is important to understand the root causes of such changes since this allows us to react to change or anticipate future changes. Research in process mining has so far… ▽ More Rapidly changing business environments expose companies to high levels of uncertainty. This uncertainty manifests itself in significant changes that tend to occur over the lifetime of a process and possibly affect its performance. It is important to understand the root causes of such changes since this allows us to react to change or anticipate future changes. Research in process mining has so far only focused on detecting, locating and characterizing significant changes in a process and not on finding root causes of such changes. In this paper, we aim to close this gap. We propose a framework that adds an explainability level onto concept drift detection in process mining and provides insights into the cause-effect relationships behind significant changes. We define different perspectives of a process, detect concept drifts in these perspectives and plug the perspectives into a causality check that determines whether these concept drifts can be causal to each other. We showcase the effectiveness of our framework by evaluating it on both synthetic and real event data. Our experiments show that our approach unravels cause-effect relationships and provides novel insights into executed processes. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2021; originally announced May 2021.