Timeline for Should I report an accepted PhD thesis in which the literature review is copied verbatim from sources?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 23, 2020 at 17:47 | history | edited | Debora Weber-Wulff | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
typo
|
Nov 30, 2015 at 23:15 | comment | added | Davidmh | "Hi, random professor, I want to know your opinion on this completely hypothetical scenario, that is totally invented." Sounds to me as convincing as "a friend of mine that is totally not me has this embarrassing question about drugs" | |
Mar 13, 2015 at 16:01 | comment | added | WoJ | The analogy is interesting, though there is certainly a gap between a PhD student copying work about the usage of commas in ancient French between 1743 and 1792 in Toulouse, and a doctor operating while high. I understand that this is obviously a novel and everything but the young doctor, in the second case, may commit a felony by not reporting that (IANAL but it looks quite so). The first case surely reduces our knowledge about comma usage in the past but the risk for current population is somehow limited. | |
Dec 8, 2014 at 21:57 | history | answered | Tom Au | CC BY-SA 3.0 |