Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

14
  • 1
    Why do you want to reduce this metric? Presumably anyone sane looking at it will be able to see that the detector is just detecting a lot of regular things and not plagiarism.
    – JoshuaZ
    Commented Jul 2 at 13:48
  • 1
    Are you running the software yourself, or is someone else running it and just giving you the output?
    – Anonymous
    Commented Jul 2 at 13:58
  • 7
    "paraphrased from another article (literally copy/pasted)" -- That doesn't really make sense. To be clear, you copy-pasted and then changed some words, or do you mean something else? Commented Jul 2 at 14:11
  • 9
    @user13267: That would of course be a "quote", not a "paraphrase" (I'm assuming you've actually got the copied text noted in quotation marks). It's, respectfully, kind of a red flag to not know that. Commented Jul 2 at 15:39
  • 1
    And is this mandatory? If it is, whoever is mandating it should have guidelines on how they set the software up (and I've used it-- it definitely has settings) and what you should do with or about the results.
    – Anonymous
    Commented Jul 2 at 22:46