To touch or to be touched? comparing appraisal of vicarious execution and reception of interpersonal touch
- PMID: 38758835
- PMCID: PMC11101113
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293164
To touch or to be touched? comparing appraisal of vicarious execution and reception of interpersonal touch
Abstract
Unmyelinated C-Tactile (CT) fibres are activated by caress-like touch, eliciting a pleasant feeling that decreases for static and faster stroking. Previous studies documented this effect also for vicarious touch, hypothesising simulation mechanisms driving the perception and appreciation of observed interpersonal touch. Notably, less is known about appreciation of vicarious execution of touch, that is as referred to the one giving gentle touch. To address this issue, 53 healthy participants were asked to view and rate a series of videoclips displaying an individual being touched by another on hairy (i.e., hand dorsum) or glabrous (i.e., palm) skin sites, with touch being delivered at CT-optimal (5 cm/s) or non-CT optimal velocities (0 cm/s or 30 cm/s). Following the observation of each clip, participants were asked to rate self-referred desirability and model-referred pleasantness of vicarious touch for both executer (toucher-referred) and receiver (touchee-referred). Consistent with the CT fibres properties, for both self-referred desirability and model-referred pleasantness judgements of vicarious touch execution and reception, participants provided higher ratings for vicarious touch delivered at CT-optimal than other velocities, and when observed CT-optimal touch was delivered to the hand-dorsum compared to the palm. However, higher ratings were attributed to vicarious reception compared to execution of CT-optimal touch. Notably, individual differences in interoceptive trusting and attitude to interpersonal touch were positively correlated with, respectively, toucher- and touchee-related overall appraisal ratings of touch. These findings suggest that the appreciation of both toucher- and touchee-referred vicarious touch is specifically attuned to CT-optimal touch, even though they might rely on different neurocognitive mechanisms to understand affective information conveyed by interpersonal tactile interactions.
Copyright: © 2024 Butti et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Children's vicarious ratings of social touch are tuned to the velocity but not the location of a caress.PLoS One. 2021 Aug 26;16(8):e0256303. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256303. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34437583 Free PMC article.
-
Vicarious ratings of social touch reflect the anatomical distribution & velocity tuning of C-tactile afferents: A hedonic homunculus?Behav Brain Res. 2017 Mar 1;320:91-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.046. Epub 2016 Nov 30. Behav Brain Res. 2017. PMID: 27915070
-
Hold me or stroke me? Individual differences in static and dynamic affective touch.PLoS One. 2023 May 23;18(5):e0281253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281253. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 37220110 Free PMC article.
-
Pleasantness ratings in response to affective touch across hairy and glabrous skin: A meta-analysis.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Dec;131:88-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.026. Epub 2021 Sep 16. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021. PMID: 34537264 Review.
-
The neurophysiology of unmyelinated tactile afferents.Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010 Feb;34(2):185-91. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.011. Epub 2008 Oct 8. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010. PMID: 18952123 Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources