Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 11;14(4):315.
doi: 10.3390/bs14040315.

Manipulations in Democracy?

Ruth Ben-Yashar  1
Affiliations

Manipulations in Democracy?

Ruth Ben-Yashar. Behav Sci (Basel). .

Abstract

Democracy is upheld through the principle of majority rule. To validate the application of democracy, it is imperative to assess the sincerity of voter decisions. When voter sincerity is compromised, manipulation may occur, thereby undermining the legitimacy of democratic processes. This paper presents a general version of a symmetric dichotomous choice model. Using simple majority rule, we show that when a voter receives one or more private signals, sincere voting is an equilibrium behavior. A slight change to this basic model may create an incentive to vote insincerely. We show that even in a more restricted model where every voter receives only one private signal whose level of precision is the same for all the voters but depends on the state of nature, voters may have an incentive to vote insincerely.

Keywords: multiple private signals; simple majority rule; sincere voting; state of nature.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. de Condorcet N. Essai sur l’Application de l’Analyse à la Probabilité des Décisions Rendues à la Pluralité des Voix. Edward Elgar; Aldershot, UK: 1785. McLean, I., Hewitt, F., Translaters.
    1. Piketty T. The Information-Aggregation Approach to Political Institutions. Eur. Econ. Rev. 1999;43:791–800. doi: 10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00094-4. - DOI
    1. Dietrich F., List C. Propositionwise Judgment Aggregation: The General Case. Soc. Choice Welf. 2013;40:1067–1095. doi: 10.1007/s00355-012-0661-7. - DOI
    1. Feld S.L., Grofman B. The Accuracy of Group Majority Decisions in Groups with Added Members. Public Choice. 1984;42:273–285. doi: 10.1007/BF00124946. - DOI
    1. Grofman B. A Comment on Democratic Theory: A Preliminary Mathematical Model. Public Choice. 1975;21:100–103. doi: 10.1007/BF01705949. - DOI

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.

LinkOut - more resources