Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Apr 10;62(4):e0161123.
doi: 10.1128/jcm.01611-23. Epub 2024 Mar 12.

Clinical utility of multiplex PCR in the detection of pathogens from sterile body fluids

Affiliations

Clinical utility of multiplex PCR in the detection of pathogens from sterile body fluids

Christina R Cox et al. J Clin Microbiol. .

Abstract

Rapid identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is essential for appropriate patient management, specifically antimicrobial therapy. Limited sensitivity and increased time to detection of traditional culture prompted us to evaluate additional testing to contribute to the diagnosis of infection. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the GenMark Dx ePlex Blood Culture Identification (BCID) Panels on positive body fluids inoculated into blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms. A total of 88 positive body fluids from blood culture bottles were analyzed using a Gram-Positive, Gram-Negative, and/or Fungal pathogen BCID Panel based on the Gram stain result. Each result was compared to routine culture performed from the positive bottle. When using culture as a reference standard, we found the ePlex multiplex panel performed with a positive percent agreement of 96.5% and a negative percent agreement of 99.8%. The use of multiplex PCR may be a useful supplement to routine culture for NSBF in blood culture bottles.

Importance: The identification of pathogens in normally sterile body fluid (NSBF) is performed using routine culture, the current gold standard. Limitations of this method include sensitivity and increased turnaround times which could potentially delay vital patient care, especially antimicrobial therapy. Adaptations of NSBF in blood culture bottles prompted us to consider the utility of additional methods to bridge the gap in diagnostic challenges for these life-threatening infections. Multiplex molecular panels have been manufactured for use with multiple specimen types including blood, cerebral spinal fluid, stool, and respiratory. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the off-label use of ePlex Blood Culture Identification Panels on positive body fluids grown in blood culture bottles for the detection of microorganisms for research purposes.

Keywords: fluid; infection; molecular; multiplex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

E.A.P., J.E.M., M.V.P.-F.—Roche diagnostics provided reagents for this study.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blaschke AJ, Heyrend C, Byington CL, Fisher MA, Barker E, Garrone NF, Thatcher SA, Pavia AT, Barney T, Alger GD, Daly JA, Ririe KM, Ota I, Poritz MA. 2012. Rapid identification of pathogens from positive blood cultures by multiplex polymerase chain reaction using the FilmArray system. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 74:349–355. doi:10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.08.013 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carroll KC, Reid JL, Thornberg A, Whitfield NN, Trainor D, Lewis S, Wakefield T, Davis TE, Church KG, Samuel L, Mills R, Jim P, Young S, Nolte FS. 2020. Clinical performance of the novel GenMark Dx ePlex blood culture ID Gram-positive panel. J Clin Microbiol 58:e01730-19. doi:10.1128/JCM.01730-19 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Oberhettinger P, Zieger J, Autenrieth I, Marschal M, Peter S. 2020. Evaluation of two rapid molecular test systems to establish an algorithm for fast identification of bacterial pathogens from positive blood cultures. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 39:1147–1157. doi:10.1007/s10096-020-03828-5 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparks R, Balgahom R, Janto C, Polkinghorne A, Branley J. 2021. Evaluation of the BioFire blood culture identification 2 panel and impact on patient management and antimicrobial stewardship. Pathology 53:889–895. doi:10.1016/j.pathol.2021.02.016 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Banerjee R, Teng CB, Cunningham SA, Ihde SM, Steckelberg JM, Moriarty JP, Shah ND, Mandrekar JN, Patel R. 2015. Randomized trial of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification and susceptibility testing. Clin Infect Dis 61:1071–1080. doi:10.1093/cid/civ447 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources