Neurophysiological responses to emotional faces predict dynamic fluctuations in affect in adolescents
- PMID: 37905333
- PMCID: PMC10939961
- DOI: 10.1111/psyp.14476
Neurophysiological responses to emotional faces predict dynamic fluctuations in affect in adolescents
Abstract
The ability to accurately identify and interpret others' emotions is critical for social and emotional functioning during adolescence. Indeed, previous research has identified that laboratory-based indices of facial emotion recognition and engagement with emotional faces predict adolescent mood states. Whether socioemotional information processing relates to real-world affective dynamics using an ecologically sensitive approach, however, has rarely been assessed. In the present study, adolescents (N = 62; ages 13-18) completed a Facial Recognition Task, including happy, angry, and sad stimuli, while EEG data were acquired. Participants also provided ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data probing their current level of happiness, anger, and sadness for 1-week, resulting in indices of emotion (mean-level, inertia, instability). Analyses focused on relations between (1) accuracy for and (2) prolonged engagement with (LPP) emotional faces and EMA-reported emotions. Greater prolonged engagement with happy faces was related to less resistance to changes in happiness (i.e., less happiness inertia), whereas greater prolonged engagement with angry faces associated with more resistance to changes in anger (i.e., greater anger inertia). Results suggest that socioemotional processes captured by laboratory measures have real-world implications for adolescent affective states and highlight potentially actionable targets for novel treatment approaches (e.g., just-in-time interventions). Future studies should continue to assess relations among socioemotional informational processes and dynamic fluctuations in adolescent affective states.
Keywords: EMA; ERPs; LPP; adolescents; emotion.
© 2023 The Authors. Psychophysiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Psychophysiological Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Similar articles
-
The role of the cannabinoid receptor in adolescents' processing of facial expressions.Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Jan;43(1):98-105. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13118. Epub 2015 Dec 28. Eur J Neurosci. 2016. PMID: 26527537
-
Children's recognition of happy, sad, and angry facial expressions across emotive intensities.J Exp Child Psychol. 2020 Sep;197:104881. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104881. Epub 2020 Jun 16. J Exp Child Psychol. 2020. PMID: 32559635
-
Too bad: Bias for angry faces in social anxiety interferes with identity processing.Neuropsychologia. 2016 Apr;84:136-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.02.005. Epub 2016 Feb 13. Neuropsychologia. 2016. PMID: 26878979
-
Early Maladaptive Schemas and the Accuracy of Facial Emotion Recognition: A Preliminary Investigation.Psychol Rep. 2023 Aug;126(4):1585-1604. doi: 10.1177/00332941221075248. Epub 2022 Mar 2. Psychol Rep. 2023. PMID: 35084239 Review.
-
Current status of the anger superiority hypothesis: A meta-analytic review of N2pc studies.Psychophysiology. 2021 Jan;58(1):e13700. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13700. Epub 2020 Oct 11. Psychophysiology. 2021. PMID: 33040366 Review.
References
-
- Bailen NH, Green LM, & Thompson RJ (2019). Understanding emotion in adolescents: A review of emotional frequency, intensity, instability, and clarity. Emotion Review, 11(1), 63–73. 10.1177/1754073918768878 - DOI
-
- Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, & Walker S (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. 10.18637/jss.v067.i01 - DOI
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials