Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Nov:142:104917.
doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104917. Epub 2022 Oct 14.

Attentional biases in human anxiety

Affiliations
Review

Attentional biases in human anxiety

Emilio A Valadez et al. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Nov.

Abstract

Across clinical and subclinical samples, anxiety has been associated with increased attentional capture by cues signaling danger. Various cognitive models attribute the onset and maintenance of anxiety symptoms to maladaptive selective information processing. In this brief review, we 1) describe the evidence for the relations between anxiety and attention bias toward threat, 2) discuss the neurobiology of anxiety-related differences in threat bias, 3) summarize work investigating the developmental origins of attention bias toward threat, and 4) examine efforts to translate threat bias research into clinical intervention. Future directions in each area are discussed, including the use of novel analytic approaches improving characterization of threat-processing-related brain networks, clarifying the role of cognitive control in the development of attention bias toward threat, and the need for larger, well-controlled randomized clinical trials examining moderators and mediators of treatment response. Ultimately, this work has important implications for understanding the etiology of and for intervening on anxiety difficulties among children and adults.

Keywords: Amygdala; Anxiety; Attention bias; Development; Intervention; Prefrontal cortex; Temperament; Threat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Schematic of dot-probe task. Adapted from Gober et al., 2021. In this example, participants are asked to indicate the direction of the arrow via a button press. Faster reaction times on threat congruent trials (when the arrow appears in the previous location of the angry face) than on threat incongruent trials (when the arrow appears in the previous location of the neutral face) may indicate the presence of an attention bias toward threat. In the assessment version of the task, the probes appear with equal probability at the location of the threat-related (threat congruent trials) and neutral stimuli (threat incongruent trials; MacLeod et al., 1986). However, when adapted for attention bias modification (ABM) training, the probes nearly always (e.g., on approximately 90% of trials) appear in the previous location of the neutral stimulus. By reducing the likelihood that the probe will appear at the position of the threatening stimulus, ABM aims to shift attention away from threat gradually and implicitly over repeated trials (MacLeod & Mathews, 2012; Shechner & Bar-Haim, 2016).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Model of relations among behavioral inhibition, attention toward potential threat, cognitive control style, and anxiety.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Abend R, Bajaj MA, Matsumoto C, Yetter M, Harrewijn A, Cardinale EM, Kircanski K, Lebowitz ER, Silverman WK, Bar-Haim Y, Lazarov A, Leibenluft E, Brotman M, & Pine DS (2021). Converging Multi-modal Evidence for Implicit Threat-Related Bias in Pediatric Anxiety Disorders. Research on Child and Adolescent Psychopathology, 49(2), 227–240. 10.1007/s10802-020-00712-w - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abend R, de Voogd L, Salemink E, Wiers RW, Pérez-Edgar K, Fitzgerald A, White LK, Salum GA, He J, Silverman WK, Pettit JW, Pine DS, & Bar-Haim Y (2018). Association between attention bias to threat and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents. Depression and Anxiety, 35(3), 229–238. 10.1002/da.22706 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abend R, Karni A, Sadeh A, Fox NA, Pine DS, & Bar-Haim Y (2013). Learning to Attend to Threat Accelerates and Enhances Memory Consolidation. PLOS ONE, 8(4), e62501. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062501 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abend R, Pine DS, Fox NA, & Bar-Haim Y (2014). Learning and Memory Consolidation Processes of Attention-Bias Modification in Anxious and Nonanxious Individuals. Clinical Psychological Science, 2(5), 620–627. 10.1177/2167702614526571 - DOI
    1. Aktar E, Van Bockstaele B, Pérez-Edgar K, Wiers RW, & Bögels SM (2019). Intergenerational transmission of attentional bias and anxiety. Developmental Science, 22(3), e12772. 10.1111/desc.12772 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types