Using Crowdsourcing for Alcohol and Nicotine Use Research: Prevalence, Data Quality, and Attrition on Amazon Mechanical Turk
- PMID: 35258409
- PMCID: PMC9157393
- DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2022.2046096
Using Crowdsourcing for Alcohol and Nicotine Use Research: Prevalence, Data Quality, and Attrition on Amazon Mechanical Turk
Abstract
BackgroundGauging the feasibility of using Amazon Mechanical Turk ® (MTurk) for various types of substance use research is precluded by a lack of information pertaining to the recruitment process in published studies utilizing it and concurrent information on data quality. ObjectiveThe present report addressed this gap by documenting the prevalence of alcohol and nicotine use, self-reported major health conditions, and information on data quality and retention on MTurk. Individuals 21 to 90 years old (N = 1101, Mdn age = 30) with United States-based MTurk accounts completed a stand-alone screening survey. The screening consisted of basic demographic, substance use, and physical/mental health questions, as well as items to gauge language proficiency/attention (i.e., data quality). ResultsPoor quality data was infrequent (6.5% of participants) and associated with self-reported non-United States residence, affirmative responding (e.g., currently pregnant, using both alcohol and nicotine), and other response characteristics (e.g., not disclosing health conditions). Among those passing quality checks, alcohol and nicotine use were relatively common (71.5% and 24.8%). Major physical (6.3%) and mental health conditions (14.8%) were less common. Despite not sending direct invitations, most eligible participants returned to and completed the main study (81.7%). Conclusions/Importance: Alcohol and nicotine use were relatively common among MTurk workers and retention rates were high. Together with the low prevalence of poor quality data, MTurk appears to remain a fruitful platform for substance use research; although researchers must be diligent in using appropriate screening tools, as substance use was sometimes associated with poor data quality and MTurk account information may not be reliable.
Keywords: Crowdsourcing; alcohol; nicotine; retention; substance use.
Conflict of interest statement
Disclosure Statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Figures
Similar articles
-
The Psychosocial Predictors and Day-Level Correlates of Substance Use Among Participants Recruited via an Online Crowdsourcing Platform in the United States: Daily Diary Study.JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Apr 27;7(4):e23872. doi: 10.2196/23872. JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021. PMID: 33904828 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Turk data collection in addiction research: utility, concerns and best practices.Addiction. 2020 Oct;115(10):1960-1968. doi: 10.1111/add.15032. Epub 2020 Mar 24. Addiction. 2020. PMID: 32135574 Free PMC article.
-
Effects of Excluding Those Who Report Having "Syndomitis" or "Chekalism" on Data Quality: Longitudinal Health Survey of a Sample From Amazon's Mechanical Turk.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Aug 4;25:e46421. doi: 10.2196/46421. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 37540543 Free PMC article.
-
Concerns and recommendations for using Amazon MTurk for eating disorder research.Int J Eat Disord. 2022 Feb;55(2):263-272. doi: 10.1002/eat.23614. Epub 2021 Sep 25. Int J Eat Disord. 2022. PMID: 34562036 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Measuring psychiatric symptoms online: A systematic review of the use of inventories on Amazon Mechanical Turk (mTurk).J Psychiatr Res. 2023 Jul;163:118-126. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2023.05.027. Epub 2023 May 2. J Psychiatr Res. 2023. PMID: 37209617 Review.
Cited by
-
Are the attention checks embedded in delay discounting tasks a valid marker for data quality?Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023 Oct;31(5):908-919. doi: 10.1037/pha0000645. Epub 2023 Mar 23. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023. PMID: 36951710 Free PMC article.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 - DOI
-
- Arditte KA, Çek D, Shaw AM, & Timpano KR (2016). The importance of assessing clinical phenomena in Mechanical Turk research. Psychological Assessment, 28(6), 684. - PubMed
-
- Athamneh LN, Stein MD, Lin EH, Stein JS, Mellis AM, Gatchalian KM, Epstein LH, & Bickel WK (2020). Setting a goal could help you control: Comparing the effect of health goal versus general episodic future thinking on health behaviors among cigarette smokers and obese individuals. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 29(1), 59. 10.1037/pha0000351 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Barrett TS, & Brignone E (2017). Furniture for Quantitative Scientists. The R Journal, 9(2). 10.32614/RJ-2017-037 - DOI
-
- Berinsky AJ, Huber GA, & Lenz GS (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3), 351–368. 10.1093/pan/mpr057 - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous