Inference from explanation
- PMID: 34928680
- DOI: 10.1037/xge0001151
Inference from explanation
Abstract
What do we communicate with causal explanations? Upon being told, "E because C", a person might learn that C and E both occurred, and perhaps that there is a causal relationship between C and E. In fact, causal explanations systematically disclose much more than this basic information. Here, we offer a communication-theoretic account of explanation that makes specific predictions about the kinds of inferences people draw from others' explanations. We test these predictions in a case study involving the role of norms and causal structure. In Experiment 1, we demonstrate that people infer the normality of a cause from an explanation when they know the underlying causal structure. In Experiment 2, we show that people infer the causal structure from an explanation if they know the normality of the cited cause. We find these patterns both for scenarios that manipulate the statistical and prescriptive normality of events. Finally, we consider how the communicative function of explanations, as highlighted in this series of experiments, may help to elucidate the distinctive roles that normality and causal structure play in causal judgment, paving the way toward a more comprehensive account of causal explanation. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
Similar articles
-
Confidence and gradation in causal judgment.Cognition. 2022 Jun;223:105036. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105036. Epub 2022 Jan 29. Cognition. 2022. PMID: 35092903
-
Best, second-best, and good-enough explanations: How they matter to reasoning.J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018 Nov;44(11):1792-1813. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000545. Epub 2018 Feb 1. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2018. PMID: 29389197
-
Normality: Part descriptive, part prescriptive.Cognition. 2017 Oct;167:25-37. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.10.024. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Cognition. 2017. PMID: 27842702
-
Causal learning and inference as a rational process: the new synthesis.Annu Rev Psychol. 2011;62:135-63. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.121208.131634. Annu Rev Psychol. 2011. PMID: 21126179 Review.
-
Learning about causes from people and about people as causes: probabilistic models and social causal reasoning.Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012;43:125-60. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397919-3.00005-8. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2012. PMID: 23205410 Review.
Cited by
-
Biology, Society, or Choice: How Do Non-Experts Interpret Explanations of Behaviour?Open Mind (Camb). 2023 Aug 20;7:625-651. doi: 10.1162/opmi_a_00098. eCollection 2023. Open Mind (Camb). 2023. PMID: 37840758 Free PMC article.
-
How people think about the truth of hypothetical impossibilities.Mem Cognit. 2024 Jan;52(1):182-196. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01454-y. Epub 2023 Oct 3. Mem Cognit. 2024. PMID: 37787932 Free PMC article.
-
How people reason with counterfactual and causal explanations for Artificial Intelligence decisions in familiar and unfamiliar domains.Mem Cognit. 2023 Oct;51(7):1481-1496. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01407-5. Epub 2023 Mar 24. Mem Cognit. 2023. PMID: 36964302 Free PMC article.
-
What would have happened? Counterfactuals, hypotheticals and causal judgements.Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 19;377(1866):20210339. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2021.0339. Epub 2022 Oct 31. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2022. PMID: 36314143 Free PMC article.
-
Causal Judgment in the Wild: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election.Cogn Sci. 2022 Feb;46(2):e13101. doi: 10.1111/cogs.13101. Cogn Sci. 2022. PMID: 35122295 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources