Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy
- PMID: 34469763
- PMCID: PMC8473558
- DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01910-3
Second asymptomatic carotid surgery trial (ACST-2): a randomised comparison of carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy
Abstract
Background: Among asymptomatic patients with severe carotid artery stenosis but no recent stroke or transient cerebral ischaemia, either carotid artery stenting (CAS) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA) can restore patency and reduce long-term stroke risks. However, from recent national registry data, each option causes about 1% procedural risk of disabling stroke or death. Comparison of their long-term protective effects requires large-scale randomised evidence.
Methods: ACST-2 is an international multicentre randomised trial of CAS versus CEA among asymptomatic patients with severe stenosis thought to require intervention, interpreted with all other relevant trials. Patients were eligible if they had severe unilateral or bilateral carotid artery stenosis and both doctor and patient agreed that a carotid procedure should be undertaken, but they were substantially uncertain which one to choose. Patients were randomly allocated to CAS or CEA and followed up at 1 month and then annually, for a mean 5 years. Procedural events were those within 30 days of the intervention. Intention-to-treat analyses are provided. Analyses including procedural hazards use tabular methods. Analyses and meta-analyses of non-procedural strokes use Kaplan-Meier and log-rank methods. The trial is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN21144362.
Findings: Between Jan 15, 2008, and Dec 31, 2020, 3625 patients in 130 centres were randomly allocated, 1811 to CAS and 1814 to CEA, with good compliance, good medical therapy and a mean 5 years of follow-up. Overall, 1% had disabling stroke or death procedurally (15 allocated to CAS and 18 to CEA) and 2% had non-disabling procedural stroke (48 allocated to CAS and 29 to CEA). Kaplan-Meier estimates of 5-year non-procedural stroke were 2·5% in each group for fatal or disabling stroke, and 5·3% with CAS versus 4·5% with CEA for any stroke (rate ratio [RR] 1·16, 95% CI 0·86-1·57; p=0·33). Combining RRs for any non-procedural stroke in all CAS versus CEA trials, the RR was similar in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients (overall RR 1·11, 95% CI 0·91-1·32; p=0·21).
Interpretation: Serious complications are similarly uncommon after competent CAS and CEA, and the long-term effects of these two carotid artery procedures on fatal or disabling stroke are comparable.
Funding: UK Medical Research Council and Health Technology Assessment Programme.
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests We declare no competing interests.
Figures
Comment in
-
Intervention for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.Lancet. 2021 Sep 18;398(10305):1025-1027. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01965-6. Epub 2021 Aug 29. Lancet. 2021. PMID: 34469761 No abstract available.
-
CAS and CEA have similar risks and benefits.Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Nov;18(11):738. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00622-4. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021. PMID: 34508231 No abstract available.
-
Is stenting equivalent to endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?Lancet. 2022 Mar 19;399(10330):1114-1115. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02498-3. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35305736 No abstract available.
-
Is stenting equivalent to endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis?Lancet. 2022 Mar 19;399(10330):1115-1116. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02497-1. Lancet. 2022. PMID: 35305737 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis.Health Technol Assess. 2016 Mar;20(20):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta20200. Health Technol Assess. 2016. PMID: 26979174 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
The Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial-2 (ACST-2): an ongoing randomised controlled trial comparing carotid endarterectomy with carotid artery stenting to prevent stroke.Health Technol Assess. 2017 Oct;21(57):1-40. doi: 10.3310/hta21570. Health Technol Assess. 2017. PMID: 29019319 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Carotid endarterectomy or stenting or best medical treatment alone for moderate-to-severe asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis: 5-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.Lancet Neurol. 2022 Oct;21(10):877-888. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(22)00290-3. Lancet Neurol. 2022. PMID: 36115360 Clinical Trial.
-
Safety of Stenting and Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 May;55(5):614-624. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.02.020. Epub 2018 Mar 17. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018. PMID: 29559195 Review.
-
Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Stroke. 2017 Aug;48(8):2150-2157. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.016824. Epub 2017 Jul 5. Stroke. 2017. PMID: 28679848 Review.
Cited by
-
Drug-coated Balloons in the Neurovascular Setting: A Comprehensive, Systematic Review of Current Use and Indications.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 2;23(4):128. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304128. eCollection 2022 Apr. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022. PMID: 39076219 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of Pre- and Post-Procedural Neurological Assessment, and Outcome of Carotid Endarterectomy or Stenting.J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 17;13(14):4177. doi: 10.3390/jcm13144177. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39064217 Free PMC article.
-
Early and Long-Term Results of Simultaneous and Staged Revascularization of Coronary and Carotid Arteries.Pathophysiology. 2024 Apr 13;31(2):210-224. doi: 10.3390/pathophysiology31020017. Pathophysiology. 2024. PMID: 38651405 Free PMC article.
-
Statistical analyses of ordinal outcomes in randomised controlled trials: a scoping review.Trials. 2024 Apr 6;25(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08072-2. Trials. 2024. PMID: 38582924 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.EuroIntervention. 2024 Apr 1;20(7):e445-e452. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00624. EuroIntervention. 2024. PMID: 38562068
References
-
- Cole TS, Mezher AW, Catapano JS. Nationwide trends in carotid endarterectomy and carotid artery stenting in the post-CREST era. Stroke. 2020;51:579–587. - PubMed
-
- Venermo M, Wang G, Sedrakyan A. Editor's choice—carotid stenosis treatment: variation in international practice patterns. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:511–519. - PubMed
-
- Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen (IQTiG) Karotis-Revaskularisation. https://iqtig.org/qs-verfahren/qs-karotis/
-
- Halliday A, Peto R, Bulbulia R. Carotid artery surgery to reduce long-term stroke rates: individual patient data meta-analysis of the randomised trials in asymptomatic patients. SSRN. 2021 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3909921 published online Aug 23. (preprint).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials